Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)O
帖子
14
评论
276
加入于
3 wk. ago

  • Going by Trump's actions in first term, the "no wars" thing was the rare promise that was actually pretty believable.

    Trump first term didn't start new big wars, and withdrew from e.g. Afghanistan (in a bullshit way, but still). Based on past actions, and yes because Trump promised it, I believed that Trump would be isolationist in his second term.

  • But the oil price shock is going to hurt Trump electorally, and normal people's wallets, way worse than the Epstein files. So in a sense it is silly to say that the distraction is "working".

  • Which is a really stupid thing to say. Should e.g. Ukraine not fight for peace? Should Britain not have fought for peace in WW2?

  • selfishness

    The wild thing is that thing would be so much better, if they were just capable of being rationally selfish. Like, don't elect a blatantly corrupt selfish billionaire to be President. Instead elect people who don't want tax cuts for the 1%.

  • Sometimes, like your comment, I wonder if "conservative" is used as a synonym for "stupid".

  • Yes their airspace and US military bases are used for offensive attacks on Iran.

    Source?

  • That is absolutely a legal target for Russia too. I

    Not according to international law, as I understand it.

  • That stance makes absolutely no sense. If a nation is invading you the military bases belonging to that nation are valid legal targets.

    Well yes and not - but that is how international law works. As an analogy, Russia is not attacking tanks heading through the EU to Ukraine, before they pass the border into Ukraine.

    There has to be a consensus of what constitutes a legal target. Or the whole world would be anarchy.

  • But at the same time those same people are in panic about stuff like trans people and public bathrooms. Which has never and will never affect them personally.

  • radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on

    NATO is sending radar intel to Ukraine too - is NATO waging war on Russia? By international law, I would say not.

    Russia is also sending satellite into to Iran. Also not an act of war.

    It seems quite important to me that there is a consensus on what constitutes an act of war. Otherwise everything becomes a potential act of war, no meaningful limits or red lines people know not to cross, with corresponding escalation risks.

  • Wikipedia says:

    Vibe coding involves accepting AI-generated code without reviewing it,

    If you are using LLMs to write e.g. small components, then you are typically understanding the structure of the program, and reviewing it.

  • Which would be justifiable in print. But this is not print, using it here is suboptimal and silly.

  • Oh, I don't dispute that it is a horrible law! It just doesn't justify the title lying about it.

  • The title is a lie. They are still allowed to use the bathroom corresponding to their gender assigned at birth. From the article:

    The Idaho House passed legislation that could make it a felony for transgender people to step foot in a bathroom matching their gender identity.

  • Is Saudi Arabia allowing strikes from bases on their soil into Iran? If not, then from a legal/moral point of view Saudi Arabia is completely in the right, since Iran has attacked Saudi Arabia first.

  • Just yesterday, Danish media posted a description of how they planned to blow up airport runways to slow down an American invasion of Greenland. And how other European countries sent soldiers to help defend.

    Trump complaining about Europe now not helping in Iran is some major chutzpah...