Posting a video from a privacy YT channel on privacy comunity is off topic?

The reasons for removal

The post it self: Not an X link, and the post had the video's description to inform on the topic. The YT Channel in question. The video in question.

Comments

Mugita Sokio @lemmy.today 1w ago
A YT link in a server that doesn't allow Twitter? That's strange. I'd say PTB in this pickle. Also, I love THO's work, so I get it.
- InternetCitizen2 @lemmy.world 6d ago
  THO is pretty awesome
redrum @lemmy.ml 2w ago
~~If you linked a Twitter link, YDI. That community has a rule that forbids x links.~~
- InternetCitizen2 @lemmy.world 2w ago
  Except there is no twitter link and the text field also has a description.
  I am linking a video from what is a pretty decent privacy channel, so it is on topic. I am not being rude, pushing a shitcoin or ad for big tech, nor is it a repost. I did PM the mod saying:
  I’m not sure why my post is removed. Its relevant to privacy as that’s the theme for that channel. Its not an x link and I included the description of the video in the text field.
  I would at least like a reply back as to why its removed so that I can keep that in mind next time I want to share something that may be relevant.
  
  redrum @lemmy.ml 2w ago
  Oops, sorry. I should have reviewed the rest of your post. It seems obvious that the first part of the alleged reason is wrong.
  Reason: Use of X's links, as well as providing 0 value content inside the post itself, forcing you to view a channel
  Maybe any of the mods could clarify it.
  @otter@lemmy.ca
  @shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  @fxomt@piefed.social
jumping redditor [they/them] @sh.itjust.works 2w ago
.ml
- Mugita Sokio @lemmy.today 1w ago
  
  That isn't .ml in this case. It was a DB0 community where OP was banned.

10 Comments