Every time you even mention the bear thing there is a 33% + global_male_sensitivity chance that the argument will spontaneously start up again. Let's see what happens!
I was gonna jokingly say that I could probably punch a bear, but I have an intense fear of bears, even taxidermy ones, so I probably couldn't.
Most bears run away from people, so you wouldn't have to anyway.
Kind of off topic, but what is a fartographer? You have my full attention in this matter
I like to roll the dice
Why would you want to attract men if the bear is safer?
Safer than something does not mean it is safe.
Just ask the bear for help if you’re in trouble.
The bear is still a minor danger the men attracted are loud and angry and thus in more danger from the bear its more a move to set two potential threats against each other while you escape.
So the solution to the original "would you rather" question is both, since the potential threats cancel each other out!
It’s just a bear. What’s the big deal? It’s not like a fellow hiker you meet on the trail that happens to have a Y-chromosome — that’d be truly dangerous.
The enemy of my enemy is my frenemy, or something like that.
Then you shoot one of those guys in the knee with a small calibre pistol you carry just for this purpose. The bear will get that guy while you can simply walk away at a normal pace.
You could also mention sea lions too; the outcome will be the same.
The thing never thought of by women is that the man and the bear were the same entity and he was just doing a little cruisin.
Every time you even mention the bear thing there is a 33% + global_male_sensitivity chance that the argument will spontaneously start up again. Let's see what happens!
I was gonna jokingly say that I could probably punch a bear, but I have an intense fear of bears, even taxidermy ones, so I probably couldn't.
Most bears run away from people, so you wouldn't have to anyway.
Kind of off topic, but what is a fartographer? You have my full attention in this matter
I like to roll the dice