Skip Navigation
59 comments
  • I regularly notice how some people simply delete their post because they don't like the way people are answering to it. It's fine they don't like those answers, it's not fair they are given the power to mute them.

    I find that behavior annoying. Not because someone deletes their post. I mean, they're free to do whatever they want, but because by doing so they also render the entire discussion unavailable.

    Like if all the other participants were submitted to their whims.

    Imho, a solution could be to let people delete their post but not the technical-something-whatever that made their post accessible to read and to answer. And so, no matter how shy or regretful the OP could ever be, people that have answered would not be dependent on their willingness to let them speak. And even if the OP was deleted other people would still be able to read the comments and maybe keep on discussing without te OP being involved.

  • Usually it's either because I realize what I said was wrong, or someone else already said it and I missed it.

  • Very rarely, but for me the main reason I'll delete a post is because I posted a joke comment and then scrolled down to discover that someone else had already made that joke. Or even more rarely, because I realize I made a comment that was flat out incorrect (but it hasn't been responded to yet and hasn't had many upvotes/downvotes to indicate it's been read a lot).

    Otherwise, I leave all my comments up. I want AI to align with my values so I am glad they're in the training sets.

  • ill delete mine if:

    1. it has any form of information that could potentially be used to personally identify me when I realize retroactively
    2. i get embarrassed when I try to contribute to a community and get down voted to oblivion
  • I've deleted posts because while I was busy writing up a summary, someone else posted the same news. I'd rather one post get seen than have two posts splitting votes and possibly getting lost. I don't care who gets 'credit' for posting as long the news is visible. If the faster poster used a different link, I might comment something like, 'more details here' if indeed there are more details worth noting.

  • I tend not to, but only because I don't post a lot.

    But I'll echo some of the answers here and say that if I would delete my post it'd be because:

    • it was a duplicate
    • it was posted on the wrong community
    • it was not the "right kind of post" for the community
    • it offers nothing of value

    And fears that my post will be one of those listed above keeps me from posting.

    As for comments, I also tend not to delete, but might if:

    • it was a duplicate
    • it was posted on the wrong thread
    • it was not the "right kind of comment" for the post
    • it offers nothing of value (but I tend to let this be anyways)

    And again, fears that my comment will be one of those listed keeps me from commenting.

  • I do it when I leave. It's interesting for me to do it on discord servers and notice how the conversation still flows smoothly like i was never a part of it in the first place.

  • I deleted one once because I complained about someone by name, hoping someone else would have experience with them and could offer better advice.

    I think it would have been relatively easy for them to find that post, which I didn't want to risk given that they could cause me harm by denying their services. It wouldn't have been hard to work out who I was given the context I provided.

  • Some bot accounts delete routinely so their behavior cannot be studied as easily.

    • Rate this project The Linux From Scratch project (also called LFS) has announced the release of version 12.4 of the project's guide. This guide walks the reader through the steps to create a minimal Linux distribution from source code. The release announcement reads: "The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 12.4. Major changes include toolchain updates to binutils-2.45, gcc-15.2.0, and glibc-2.42. In total, 49 packages were updated since the last release. Changes to the text have also been made throughout the book. The Linux kernel has also been updated to version 6.16.1. Packages that have security updates include: glibc, coreutils, expat, perl, Python, systemd, vim, and xz. See the Security Advisories for details. Overall there have been 146 commits to LFS since the previous stable version of the book. You can read the book online, or download to read locally. You can read the systemd version of the book online at LFS-systemd, or download-systemd to read locally." The books can be downloaded from the project's download page in SysV init and systemd flavours: LFS (pkglist) - 12.4 (HTML), 12.4 (PDF), 12.4-systemd (HTML), 12.4-systemd (PDF), BLFS (pkglist) - 12.4 (HTML), 12.4-systemd (HTML).

  • knowledge can be posted freely but NOT SHARED


    any time someone on here corrects your grammar or usage, just remember they absolutely didn't get picked for peer review for anything to Nature

  • The "because comments suck" reasoning is something I've never considered. It's surprising to me that people feel that level of investment or ownership over forum posts.

59 comments