Skip Navigation

What's up with this straight up pro-china and pro-russia stuff on Lemmy lately?

What's up with this straight up pro-china and pro-russia stuff on Lemmy lately?

It's not even praising the people of China and Russia, but rather their gov directly.

Obviously the states have problems, and the EU to a lesser degree, but they at least have some human rights.

Is this some kind of organized disinformation campaign?

452 comments
  • Others have given great answers, but the short-answer is that it's not a "disinformation campaign," nor is it organized. It's because Lemmy has a lot of leftists, especially Marxist-Leninists, and MLs both support AES ("Actually Existing Socialism"), like the PRC, and critically support capitalist countries forced into allying with them against the Global North's imperialism.

    In terms of their net impacts on the world, the US and EU far outweigh the evils of Russia. Russia is certainly flawed, but unlike the US and EU Russia doesn't rely on expropriating vast amounts of wealth from the Global South, sanctioning, couping, or genociding those who go against imperialism. It isn't because Russia is some moral paragon, but because they simply lack the means to be imperialist, they are boxxed in by the west and lack the financial capital to rely on expropriation of wealth.

    As for the PRC, it gets far more support, because it's the leading socialist country. 800 million people were lifted from poverty, and it's rapidly improving. Even when the west runs propaganda against them, like the COVID lab leak theory or the Chinese spy balloon hysteria, the PRC is being widely supported by the Global South as the PRC is providing a genuine alternative to the genocidal west.

    If you (or anyone else) want an introduction to Marxism-Leninism, here's my Read Theory, Darn It! introductory reading guide!

    • Russia is literally conducting an imperialist invasion of Ukraine right now...

      I can't stand this shit when fake leftists defend authoritarian, imperialist states because they oppose the west.

      Just because Russia "opposes" the west doesn't make it any better than them.

      • Russia is literally conducting an imperialist invasion of Ukraine right now...

        The most prolific invader in the world - NATO - did a coup in Ukraine, tried to bring weapons and personnel to Russia's most important border near Russia's most populated parts, and has been conducting terror attacks against the Russian population.
        The rest of the world has every right to defend against NATO, so you either have a good explanation for what else Russia could have done in this regard, or your criticism of Russia is not serious.

        Just because Russia "opposes" the west doesn't make it any better than them.

        The fact that Russia hasn't done anything nearly as bad as things like the invasion of Iraq - let alone the genocide of Palestine - does make Russia better.

      • The Russo-Ukrainian War is about forcing Ukraine to be neutral to NATO, and resolving the conflict between Kiev and the Donetsk and Luhanks People's Republics that requested Russian support after the Minsk agreements fell through due to Ukraine failing to keep up their end of the bargain. It isn't an imperialist war, the goal is not expropriation of wealth, it's to keep NATO out of the main path by which Russia has historically been invaded from the ground, such as in World War II by Nazi Germany.

        Russia is not worthy of critical support just because "west bad." Russia can't imperialize countries like the west has. It tried, back when Putin requested to join NATO 2 decades ago, but Russia was denied because the Nationalists in Russia didn't want to open their markets up to foreign plunder like in the 90s. As a consequence, Russia is forced to ally with the anti-imperialist countries, largely made up of countries in the Global South and socialist countries. The Sahel States, for example, are turning to Russia and the PRC as an alternative to western plunder, because Russia physically cannot imperialize in the same way the west does. It fundamentally lacks the ability to export vast amounts of capital and outsource production.

        If you're going to call leftists "fake," then you should at least do the due dilligence to familiarize yourself with the Marxist analysis of imperialism.

  • Time for the weekly question as to why there are anti-imperialists on the anti-imperialist platform from a redditor who joined less than a month ago

    • I am so baffled since years that (mostly) americans think if you are against us (or its imperialism) u automatically need to be pro China and vice versa. I really can't get why you guys always need to bootlick one or the other government. Why can't you not fight for a better system, why do u always fight for a better oppressor?!

      Really grinds my gears.

      • The PRC is the better system. It has a socialist market economy, one that works for the people, and doesn't depend on imperialism. China isn't an oppressor. Moreover, it is usually non-westerners that are pro-China, as they are the ones directly experiencing western imperialism and watching China focus on mutual development and cooperation.

        You have no reason to reduce the logic of why one would support the PRC down to simply being "anti-west," if you ask anyone pro-China about why they are, we can give you nuanced and complete reasoning for doing so. By caricaturing the argument of those you disagree with, you quite literally strawman them.

      • Your comment reminded me of this Rosa quote:

        “The German government‑socialists may shout that the rule of the Bolsheviks is a caricature of the dictatorship of the proletariat. If it was or is, then only for the reason that it is a product of the conduct of the German proletariat, conduct which was a caricature of socialist class struggle.”

        I live in the US, I don't see the reason to demonize its enemies on the other side of the planet when my class enemies are right here running the US government and its associated political parties.

  • Given the political leanings of Lemmy's lead developers, and relatedly the whole reason why Lemmy started development in the first place, it should not be surprising to anyone that many Lemmy users have since the very beginning of Lemmy's existence had stances that could be called, in a word, "pro-Russia" or "pro-China".

    The problem arises when people who don't hold these views look at them only through their own myopic biases, where, rather than genuinely interrogating why people might hold these attitudes, they instead more readily believe that a social media platform that most people have never even heard of is actually crawling with paid actors trying to influence public opinion.

    No, to understand my own views on Russia, you need to understand my views on Atlanticism; to understand my views on Atlanticism, you need to understand my views on class, among other things. None of that comes across clearly in a one-liner or a four-panel meme. I'm sure I could discuss it in a more fitting space provided I'm not too drained of energy from having stayed up until five in the morning for the umpteenth time.

  • Short answer: Many people support those governments critically or uncritically for various reasons.

    Long answer:

    Russia: Some people who oppose US hegemony support Russia as probably the most effective anti-US actor globally - I mean look at what they've managed (in part) to do to the US government over the last 10 years or so. They may also be sympathetic to Russian anti-NATO sentiment. People who support China may also critically support Russia since they are a strategic ally of China. Some people just full-throatedly support Russia uncritically - I don't know why they're quite so enthusiastic, but most others who have pro-Russian sentiment are still critical of Russia, but support them as a major power capable of attacking US hegemony.

    China: China is the most successful communist country to have ever existed. Many left-leaning people may support China to varying degrees because they are an Actually Existing Socialist country and because their model of Communism with Chinese Characteristics seems to work quite well for them. Due to the West (broadly) attacking Socialist governments in the name of Liberalism & becoming increasingly more fascistic, China could be an important bulwark against fascism. Many people support China uncritically - they genuinely like the Chinese system of government and want their governments to be more like China's. Other people critically support China - they believe China's government is problematic in some way(s), but support it anyway as a bastion of socialism and a significant challenger to US economic & political hegemony.

    As for support for the governments as opposed to the people: We kind of have to talk about these things at the country level, since governments are the (imperfect) embodiments of political ideologies and collectively act on behalf of the people within their borders, and "the people" aren't monolithic. We often treat countries as avatars of political ideologies which is inaccurate but is an abstraction that unfortunately often leads to an oversimplification of the ideologies behind & effects of those governments' actions while allowing us to create a comprehensible narrative.

  • Some good answers already here, but I can only answer for myself: I used to be that kind of leftist that was "Well I want socialism, but not like those scary foreign authoritarian countries. They're doing it wrong! Or that's not really socialism!" At some point after learning more history and talking with others online, I've softened my view on these places. Some of that is learning that some of what I knew about them was straight up misinformation, but some of it comes from a shift in perspective: These aren't abstract ideals of countries. They're real countries. With real people, real histories, real material conditions, real geopolitical relationships to deal with, etc. They're doing something really difficult and it's really easy to be an armchair quarterback while sitting cozy in the US where I don't have to deal with any of their tough decisions or the consequences of them. Am I happy with them doing some authoritarian policies? No. But maybe they're necessary to deal with the interference of the US? I don't know for sure if that's the best approach, but I don't have to imagine the counterexample of what it looks like if you don't take defensive measures, the US has helpfully provided a bunch in the form of all of the countries they've backed coups in for the crime of electing even a slightly leftist government. We could squabble about better ways to deal with this, but neither of us has the full context to have an educated discussion on the matter. Also for the genuinely bad stuff, I wouldn't go as far as specifically supporting those things, but it's worth putting them in perspective. You can't talk about China online without someone bringing up Tienanmen Square, meanwhile the US has been a never-ending avalanche of evil in it's short history, but you can talk about any number of things not related to politics in the US without a random leftist wandering into the discussion about the latest hollywood movie shouting the entire lyrics to "We Didn't Start the Fire." I mean we're happy to bring all that stuff up if it's in the right context, but people are so deranged about communist countries that the ONLY thing they can think to bring up in relation to them is their less savory moments that may or may not even be true/exaggerated.

    It's really hard to sort good information from bad about these places because there's so much propaganda. I get that those other countries have an incentive to put out their own propaganda, but it's hard for me to know what their reach is or what their motivations are or how much they are lying vs countering US misinfo. Meanwhile I KNOW the US has a fairly sophisticated system of propaganda spanning government agencies, media companies, NGOs, etc. I KNOW the US is motivated to prop up the interests of capitalists and try to stop other countries from pushing back against them. A lot of the bad shit and lies the US has done is just straight up declassified history. So I'm sorry if I'm a little skeptical about what the empire that's made it it's business to deny self-determination to countries around the world has to say about those countries.

    As for Russia, I'm not specifically a supporter. Ever since the USSR collapsed they've been another capitalist, imperialist country. But in terms of scale they're just not even remotely comparable to the US. They are at worst a regional power and outside of nukes can't really threaten the US on the global stage. So when the US war machine starts saber rattling about them, I know what it's for because I've seen it a million times before. We always need an external enemy to justify the massive amount of money we spend on the military and all of the capitalists who profit from it. Even if I think it would be good if someone in the region pushed back against Russian aggression, I think feeding the beast that is the US military industrial complex is a net negative for the world. Not that I really have any say in it. I can't remember the last time my congressperson or senator asked if I wanted to give another couple billion dollars to their friends in the "defense" industry. And then of course there was all the hysteria about Russian interference in our elections from the Democrats. I don't even care if they're right or wrong. That's besides the point. The function of the claims is what is more valuable to look at: The implication of "Russia is subverting our democracy by interfering in our elections." is "We had a previously uncorrupted democracy before the Russians got involved. Please ignore how our own billionaires have bought out all of our elections." It's a way to shore up support for a failing system by externalizing it's problems.

    I just want to live in a world where we can all live dignified lives. US capitalists are the current greatest obstacle to that dream. I'd rather have imperfect allies against that than throw my lot in with the "Endless war, exploitation, and ecological collapse" team.

  • China has human rights. E.G. Trans people get gender affirming healthcare, jobs, food, and housing. Something that the U.S. does not guarantee and is actively trying to ban transgender affirming care. One of the most famous people in China is Jin Xing a trans woman. The Chinese government does not restrict transgender people in the same way that the UK and the U.S. does. Largely it is social stigma that remains in China, which will and has been changing over time.

  • I'm rabidly pro-China and tacitly pro-Russia. I will praise both their people and their governments when I feel they are doing right, and criticize them when they are doing wrong.

    Not interested in spreading falsehoods, but if anyone would like to organize efforts to express these opinions and supporting evidence, I would enthusiastically participate.

    Westerners are so conditioned to regurgitate hatred against the officially sanctioned state enemies that not blindly parroting their caricatures is seen as suspicious, let alone have positive things to say.

    I have more and stronger critiques of both countries and their governments than their haters do, largely because I have made serious attempts to understand the culture, history, & material conditions of these countries, instead of brushing them off with a thought-terminating cliché.

  • Obviously the states have problems, and the EU to a lesser degree, but they at least have some human rights.

    The US has big problems with human rights, that start with zionist first rule, and needing misery and oligarchist pillaging to make Americans have bigger problems than warmongering, Israel supremacy, directly corrupt and rigged elections, or "well first they are comming for the others", and I still have bigger problems.

    The NATO colonies are even far worse. Democracy means rule by those allowed by CIA, with population programmed with CIA values. The CIA programming, and total capture of politicians, means normalizing the real enemy to the NATO colonies as a permanent friend and master. The only valid elections in entire world are those approved by CIA values. Never any need for evidence of invalidity, you just take State Department/Elon Musk view that "we will coup whoever we want to coup".

    Our countries dress pure corruption as freedom. While freedom seems awesome, the freedom to corrupt, lie, propagandize you into oppression demonic evil diminishment of nations labelled less free, and you internalize those wars as a supremacist right instead of the theft of your prosperity simply makes the corruption of democracy too powerful relative to your critical thinking, attention and distractions from your oppression.

    Without CIA influence over a country, it can hope to govern itself in national interest instead of CIA allied oligarchy. Russia and China are mostly successful at this. Freedom is awesome, but the powerful's freedom to corrupt will always result in greater overall corruption, oppression, and oligarchism Normalizing CIA involvement in your media and democracy means your nation is doomed, and lemmy defending demonic evil corruption is the direct result of a lifetime of propaganda.

    Liquid democracy is easily available with current technology. Already substantially implemented in crypto currency tokens. It's the only real democracy. That people each have an equal share in their country's government, and its revenue/left over revenue, is distributed as a dividend, means making sure there is a lot of left over revenue instead of corruption.

  • Whilst everyone here is just disagreeing with you on basically all points OP, I have to agree. There have lately been a lot more weird memmes, often factualy inaccurate and providing no real argument, that support or defend the Chinese, Russian or North Korean government. I do not in any way agree with the sentiments of these memes but if people actually hold those opinions their free to discuss it, but I would wish that they didn't do it in the form of bad memes in the general use communities, but maybe instead in one of their own, as stuff generally works on Lemmy.

    Also, a lot of the worst memes came from one single account. I have since blocked that one person and it improved the situation remarkably. And for anyone who wants to attack me for "not being able to stand hearing other people's opinions", the memes this person (or to be real, probably bot) posted were factualy incorrect, badly made and not funny in any way. I don't come to Lemmy for political discussion but for memes and other fun threads.


    This is just about my personal opinions and doesn't effect anything I wrote above but here we go. Read if you want. Regarding the endorsements of China, Russia and North Korea my main problem is that I think democracy is the most important feature of a state for I think yhat the state should exist to serve it's people and to do so in a way that reflects the people's wills. Therefore, I have a really hard time supporting any non democratic state. Also, in regards to Russia, they invaded Ukraine! I have a very hard time having any empathy for a state that shows such violent aggression against one of their neighbours. Especially as I can not see how Russia or the rest of the world stands to gain anything from this war. Ofc North Korea and China have also done horrible things but I think have have gotten my point across at this point, I think democracy and free speech is important. That said, if someone can point to a particular part of, or some project of, some non democratic country that's working well and then say "hey, maybe we should try that", then I have no problem with that. But fully endorsing and saying that we should be like a, for example, China to me is a absolutely horrible idea.

    Also, because people will claim that I did even though I didn't say a shit about it, I do not either particularly like the US. What I said about democracy and not invading other countries applies to them to. I'm also not from the US but rather from Sweden in the EU

    EDIT: after reading even more of this thread I think I'm starting to understand that many people just support Russia and China because there a counterweight to the US. For me this could maybe be a valid argument for supporting some of what China does but it does not for me mean that I can endorse China and their non democracy leadership and darker sides. Things simply don't add up for me, I can't support China because the US shouldn't get to powerful because China should neither have that power.

452 comments