GOG is doing much better than in 2022
GOG 2023 update #2: facts and numbers of 2022
Gog is doing much better than in 2022. They are making 1.2M dollars in profit. Which is pretty good for such a platform personally. I really like the ideals of GOG, but haven't really used the platform a whole lot.
If you want a markup of what this actaully means see here
I'd be happy to shop there again if they put out Galaxy on Linux. Community launchers are cool, but I want the same support for automatic updates that their Windows customers get.
Same, Steam on the other hand had been killing it for Linux gamers. What's funny is if you go to the gog forums it's been like the number one requested feature for years.
I do not fucking understand this. You're never going to compete with Steam. But you have this niche of DRM free marketplace and you ignore the entire Linux community? A community that THRIVES on FOSS and DRM free software.
It's such an idiotic move to not develop a linux client. I will never fucking comprehend this.
Their apple support has always been pretty mixed at best. I always assumed they're the kind of gamers who are like "windows is for gaming, gamers use windows, sure you CAN do other things, but why would you?"
yeah, no idea what brain-headed move that is
On the bright side it runs really well installing it from Bottles
I started buying legitimate copies of games when I was finally able to afford it a few years ago. I love how GOG lets you actually keep the games forever and that's where I was getting games from at first, but then moved to Steam because of how much good they've done to Linux gaming. meanwhile GOG Galaxy for Linux has been a most requested and most ignored request for years.
sadly
yeah... Steam has always been my go-to anyway. Even before using Linux myself.
But i'm totally up with having other launchers like GOG.
I'd be thrilled to mostly sit and purchase from GoG if they really dedicated to Linux.
I never really minded having different launchers until I got a Steam Deck. Just having native Linux support would make them much less of a hassle.
My problem with GOG is that every time I buy a game on GOG, something then happens to result in me having to buy it again on steam. Once it was that the GoG version lagged too far behind, several times it's been that workshop support has been added, or in one case, workshop became the only source for moding.
For that I'm unlikely ever to buy from them again
I like GOG for games that are too old to be on Steam, but yeah, any game that's on Steam I'll get there because of the additional features like Steam Workshop.
My biggest problem with GOG is that Galaxy doesn't rival Steam, same as every other launcher. For example, GOG hosts a lot of older games, that used to be their bread and butter and even their namesake. These games generally don't have native controller support, so if I want that, I have to launch them through Steam anyway to use Steam Input. If I want to play something on a Linux device, which is now more likely than ever since I own a Steam Deck, the fact is that it's a pain in the ass to deal with GOG even with their minimal DRM stance (because they allow DRM now seemingly so long as it doesn't prevent the player from beating the game) because of the lack of support, making it more reasonable to buy games on Steam, even when it's a game that does support controllers (like how I own The Evil Within on GOG).
The big feature of GOG Galaxy is that you can pull every other launcher into it, but that doesn't matter to me when I still have to launch everything via Steam anyway. Feels like they're missing the point a little bit.
It looks like only the multiplayer is allowed to have an online requirement. It's DRM by another name, but at least I know how to avoid them. I too wish they didn't let those games on their store. But for me, the point of the launcher is to automatically update my games and make installing them easier. I want those features, and I want to be assured by their own support, that those things will work, even if community launchers for GOG games I bought previously or got in giveaways will suffice for now.
Same, I recently switched back to Linux and was disappointed they still haven’t made a client. Even just starting with native Linux game support would be something.
I dropped Steam because I don't like bloatwares
I dropped Steam because it gradually made the client less and less user-friendly. It's bad enough that I kinda have to use the Steam client, but then they had to do things like trash the old rendering engine and replace it with the bloat of a browser, and completely discard List View (which GOG Galaxy has just fine) and replace it with a tile view that can't even display game names in plaintext (which GOG Galaxy also has an option for in its tile view).
And that's on top of other issues with the platform such as how the Steam client forces updates. (Sure there's various workarounds but at that point Steam stops being a convenience anyway.)
I never actually needed a launcher client anyway. I gladly buy direct-download installers from sites like itch and Humble and DLsite. I don't have a fear of command line interfaces, lol, much less simply using File Explorer as my launcher. I'll use a platform's launcher willingly if it just offers benefits, but the drawbacks of Steam's using it as DRM eventually turned out to outweigh whatever minor benefits it presented.
The games that are their original meat-and-potatoes, out of print classic games, don't really update much. In many cases, the developer hasn't been in business for quite some years.
For all you Linux folks complaining about why GOG isn’t on there:
For desktop and laptop computers, Microsoft's Windows is the most used at 69%, followed by Apple's macOS at 17%, and Google's ChromeOS at 3.2% (in the US up to 8.0%), and "desktop Linux" at 2.9%. In addition, 5% is attributed to "unknown" operating systems - which are likely forms of BSD or obscure varieties of Linux.
Maybe a small company can’t devote the resources for 5% of the market share when they have 86% covered.
How small of a company do you think they are? Their parent company is publicly traded and worth at least half a billion dollars. Not only that, but after they port their launcher, they can piggyback on the investment Valve has made into the platform for pennies on the dollar, if they were interested in wrapping games with Proton or whatnot.
Just because their parent company has that much money doesn’t mean they spend it on GOG.
Sure they can, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they are. It might just take a bit of time.
I mean, I think most of us understand why GOG's Linux support is miles behind Steam's, but that doesn't change the fact that it is behind. Years ago I bought several games from GOG because of the no DRM policy; but once Steam released a Linux version, and began pumping resources into Proton, the choice for me was easy, and I switched over. I understand GOG's position, but I don't think there's anything wrong with people pointing out how GOG doesn't have the same level of Linux support as Steam does. That's useful information.
I'd guess the percentage of players with a steam deck is also in a single digit.
It is. There’s no doubt about that.
If GOG had native Linux support I'd be more interested, but their refusal to support it (despite it being their most requested feature, I may add) means I exclusively use Steam for buying my games.
You can actually get GOG games working Via Heroic Launcher on Linux/Steam Deck, and Proton works pretty well. I haven't tested in on Cyberpunk but I saw some other people say it has a 10% frame rate loss compared to playing it from Steam.
I haven’t bought a GOG game since I got my steamdeck. The convenience of native steam games is important.
Meh, Steam is 1000x better with the Steam Deck, Proton support and Linux client.
This, I've always loved GOG but ever since I've switched to primarily gaming on my steam deck, it's been more of a pain than it's really worth to use GOG
yeah, the steam deck is amazing. I love my steamdeck alot.
GOG is amazing, just wish they would make their linux support better.
yep steam is better in most aspects but the DRM aspects of GOG are more comfortable and convenient.
Yeah... But they should try at least to provide some basic Linux support. Since their stance is about no DRM, it would seem like the obvious ally.
Mhm, you can simply use Heroric or Lutris as a GoG client and utilise proton with not much hassle :)
the GOG summer sale is live as well!
I love GOG and make it a point to buy any games there that I can to support them!
Literally just bought a game on there today. Support DRM-free!
One of the biggest barriers for using GOG to me is not supporting my home currency, but I really love the DRM free and bonus content!
After being with Steam for over a decade and disliking it more and more, I ended up trying everything to maintain myself away from that platform and GOG was a godsend.
There’s a public list that has all the GOG releases that treat the GOG customers like "third class citizens", but if the game I want is not on that list, I will 100% buy it there over any other storefront. It’s great to read they’re doing well.
I really wish the best to GOG, despite the really non-linux support.
I default to GOG whenever I can. I do wish Galaxy had turned out better, it just buckles under the weight and is worse than both using the web app for the store AND third party launchers like Lunchbox. I still would much rather get the games in the format they use than on Steam, though. Any day. I will keep getting games that launch on both on GOG as long as that's an option, so I'm glad they're in the black at least.
Yeah, ive used galaxy before. It seemed like a nice looking launcherz but overall was meh
It's gimmick is supposed to be that it would scrape and integrate games from other launchers using plugins and consolidate all your PC games, friends and other tools.
Which sort of works for a while, until you try to add several thousand games, at which point the launcher takes ages to start and compile your database and generally becomes cumbersome and buggy. And once you add that stuff, removing it is surprisingly hard, so getting to your GOG games is weirdly hindered.
I love the idea, I've purchased several separate database apps over the years to try to get that exact feature. They just didn't nail it on execution and ended up with a worse version of that type of app that can accidentally become a worse launcher for your GOG library as well.
If you only use it as a GOG launcher, stick to the integrations that come pre-built and avoid plugins or if you only have a few games it's perfectly fine. Great, even. But it certainly got pretty busted in my case.
I find it funny they have a whole markup like this. It really shows that they are doing good, and want to show that to the world. It's cool
@fbievan I should utilize GOG more.
Glad to see them doing well. I try to buy from them as much as possible.
I've made more of a point to buy from them more often. I bought the DLC for Deep sky Derelicts recently (during the summer sale) because I enjoyed the base game which GoG gave me for free.
Maybe now they can afford a support service. Still waiting for the reply they said I'd get
I love GOG. If they release a game i play often, i rebuy it on that platform. I find game clients just annoying, especially ea app (stop popping up everytime i quit a game dammit). So if i can play without it, i go for it.
It's the only place I buy from now.