Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won"

thiswillhold.substack.com

Politics @beehaw.org

Chris Remington @beehaw.org

12h ago

Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won"

thiswillhold.substack.com /p/ex-cia-whistleblower-the-nsa-audited

19 comments

One of the most-compelling arguments is simply how vocal Republicans have been in accusing opponents of election rigging. It's always projection.

Well that's a lot less of a hacky article than I was expecting - though they don't provide evidence that the claimed NSA audit actually exists, they do present a damn good case for investigating it further and a reasonably plausible vector by which the election results could have been tampered with. I doubt they were manipulated, truly the conservative bloc really is large and was far more motivated than the dems in the last election, but this is pretty solid reporting for a substack and I really hope something comes of it.
- The sad thing is that it doesn't matter. Harris just noped out of there. And honestly how much choice did she have?
  Democrats spent years saying how secure the election was. It would have been absolutely terrible optics for the Democrats to come out and say, "The election was rigged." No matter how true it was.
  The issue we have today is that Republicans have succeeded. They sowed enough doubt that challenging them politically is near impossible. They control the courts, the legislature in enough states and federally, and now the executive. EVEN IF we get a fair election in 2028, you have a president who refuses to admit defeat and has the resources and, most importantly, the cult, that will defend him.
  We are in fascism times. And not enough people are doing anything about it.
  
  I was utterly blown away at how easily she just let it go. Pretty fucking insane.
  Like, the fact that the returns tilted SO AGGRESSIVELY after a certain point in time is deeply suspicious. I’ve seen the data deep-dives that people have done on several swing counties, and it’s statistically damning. The divergence from known, expected voting patterns is unambiguous.
  There are sharp, inorganic patterns in the data that cut in after a certain quantity of votes are tallied in the systems that point to algorithmic manipulation being activated - that is, there are organic/stochastically-reasonable voting patterns that are observable at first, and then it fairly sharply swaps to a clearly weighted and suspiciously consistent pattern.
  And that doesn’t even count the places where ballots “apparently” had tons of down-ballot democrats, but then Trump at the top of the ticket. That does not make sense.
- Narrator: nothing came of it.
- I think what is it Pennsylvania or Wisconsin need a recount
  
  And Michigan but we're a year in this is the point where ballots start disappearing.

There's no such thing as "Ex-"CIA

When I woke up this morning at 4am as I usually do I checked reddit and it was the top position. Number 1. When I get back from running a few hours later it was no where to be found. It was buried from the number one slot in just a few hours. I did a search and over the last 24 hours it was posted almost 30 times all if them buried. But in the long run it is going to take a lot more than just one whistle blower to get this noticed.

Hey the Tripp lite thing expanded on in a way that makes sense and isn't even surprising. It took 20 years of incompetence and corruption to make this all possible. Should know if this is real based on how hard Republicans fight it.

I want to believe something will happen. But I'm not holding my breath

this is big news honestly.
- Is it though?
  They could all come out tomorrow openly bragging that they did infact steal it, and detail exactly what they did and how they did it. Nothing would happen, Trump would stay president.
  
  however, there would be a reason to begin the next steps of ousting the existing administration.
  think of it like a kingdom with a corrupt king. even though we all know he killed the last king, there are no known heirs to the throne. once a new heir is found and they are better than the existing king, it's far easier to push the people into rebellion.

Go in front of a judge and say it.

There are definitely indications of fuckery in the election, the most compelling case I saw came from that one county in NY. According to some other people, it's a Hasidic community that just always votes however their rabbi tells them to vote, but that doesn't seem totally convincing to me.
I don't think this story is evidence of that... it's honestly just a bunch of random innuendos about international human trafficking and other voting scandals that have already been exposed as voting scandals. Aside from one change to how config.ini was handled, there is literally nothing that I saw that is even a hint of an indication that something was stolen about the 2024 election. Why not focus on the stuff that proves the case (at least to lay out the broad outlines of the argument)? At least mention what it is? Why demand hand recounts, which are a lot slower and less reliable than other types of more properly done recounts? Why this aggressive flopping around among other issues and arguments? Am I missing something?