Thorium
Thorium
111 comments
-
If stability means the pillars of our society are held up by pedophiles bring on the fuckin instability.
-
Yeah, it's always funny when conservatives are like 'careful what you wish for, Clinton was friends with Epstein too!'. Like we give a fuck, lock him up!
-
Yeah, my dad was going on about "why do all the Democrats want the Epstein files released, weren't the Clintons in there" and I'm like yeah, I want them to be investigated as well if needed. They can't imagine people would want the guys on their side investigated because after Nixon, they truly think any investigation of a political figure is for political gain.
-
Yah this argument makes no sense even if I imagine being a corn-fed chud in the hills, isn't this exactly the same "Bring down authority" narrative they've been preparing for years? Isn't this LITERALLY Q-anon's entire theater play but happening in real time?
Wow what warriors for saving children, look at 'em go! Look at them storm the capitol to bring down this evil cabal who are now actually admitting their existence in public, no code words, no secret basements! Wait, they stormed the capitol already? And it was because of no reason at all?
Well I'm sure they have something big planned to finally put an end to this deep-state scourge to life, liberty and children that they've been railing against for decades.
-
I say let's pull the copper from the walls and demolish this pedo clown world.
-
Don't forget about the catalytic converters.
-
-
It's amazing we've gotten to this point. Like, holy shit, I've got a doctor's appointment in 30 minutes. I need to ask him to stop giving me these crazy pills.
-
-
Innocent?
If they are innocent, how would releasing the document destroy them?
-
"It's good innocent fun that boys do, we have to stop persecuting these men for just doing what all men want!"
This is going to be the pro-pedo narrative that the entire right does their abrupt 180 with.
-
Because rich people are allowed to rape children. Innocence is bought. Sometimes the language they use just exposes what they really mean. You just have to pay attention.
They're not dumb. The language and the words they use reveals a lot. They are saying that revealing the worst crimes of the capitalist class will destroy the world because the capitalist class will side with pedophiles before they let the proletariat take their power.
They are saying "don't make us go full fascist death camps. Revealing this will just lead to us treating the entire population like we have Gaza. We'll defend our pedophiles if we need to to maintain power"
-
Trump will play this one like he’s played so many others: “It’s a witch hunt. They’re making up accusations to smear me. They’ll do anything to take me down because they hate me. They hate you too. See how the woke mob treat people? This is why we must destroy them.”
Allegations of sexual misconduct have a mixed history (at best) of being taken seriously. Unless there is airtight evidence locked up in those files which was specifically composed for the purpose of implicating people, and then sealed for blackmail leverage or something like that, I can’t see any charges sticking to Trump. I mean the fucker is already an impeached convicted felon and self-confessed (on tape!) rapist. His flock will never turn against him.
-
Conservatives about Pizzagate, a made-up fantasy conspiracy theory on a pedophile ring of powerful people: put them all in jail!
Conservatives about the Epstein files, a real-life conspiracy on a pedophile ring of powerful people: well surely we can't put all these people in jail, think about the consequences!
-
The difference is now their guy is affected, while with pizzagate it was only the others.
-
You don't get it! Pizzagate wasn't about our side like the Epstein files are!! /s
-
-
Why would anything collapse? What a dumb thing to say. These people already don't do anything but leech off the system. We'd have a more effective government and we'd kick the real welfare queens out.
-
Atlas shat himself or something, I don't read rich people porn
-
Filthy legs of clay.
-
-
By society they mean the veneer on brutal capitalism that allows them to do whatever the fuck they want while we get hosed
-
FUD let's them scare people into accepting fascist policy like the secret police & concentration camps by vilifying immigrants instead of the actual source of voters' problems, billionaires and the way their wealth hoarding destabilizes democracies.
-
This is what a by-election is for. Someone is removed/resigns from office, or dies in office, surely you just run a by-election?
At least this is what we do in Australia for our house of reps (there's a different system for the senate since electorates are state-wide).
-
-
Trump says it can destroy innocent people? Why would innocent people be against publishing a list of pedophiles?
-
Here's Katie Johnson's testimony on how Trump and Epstein brutally raped her and other 13 year old girls: "Katie Johnson's full testimony of 2/11/16", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo
I'm amazed it hasn't spread any more yet.
-
-
I call bullshit on 2/3 of Congress. I believe they’re not nearly as wealthy or powerful as the people being protected.
-
call bullshit on 2/3 of Congress.
Yeah..... It really doesn't have to be that dramatic. The GOP would be more than willing to bury any kind of evidence if it only endangered a couple of their mega donors.
I mean I'm guessing that the people wealthy enough to partake in pedo island probably aren't a fan of paying taxes.
-
Well maybe it would destroy them by taking out their donors?
-
Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans will ever release the Epstein files. Yes, this is a case in which "both sides" applies. I don't understand why we didn't pressure Biden to release this shit before the election.
-
-
Yeah in fact a lot more than 1/3rd of Congress voted to release the files. 211 Republicans voted to shut down the release. Seems more like a simple majority of congress is negatively impacted by the pedophile ring being exposed.
-
I think we should expel 2/3 of Congress based solely on if they take corporate/billionaire money or not. That number would probably be higher than 2/3, though.
But also expelling violent criminals would be nice, even though likely all the violent criminals in Congress are also corrupt.
-
Every House seat and 1/3 of the Senate seats are up for reelection next fall. The primaries are the only place you’ll find small donor-funded candidates.
-
-
I think what they don't want to say: enough Republican politicians will be in the files to remove the Republicans from power.
-
-
Good?
Shit ain't exactly stable for 99.9% of us.
If arresting pedos also substantially changes the way our society works, that's a win-win
-
You're misunderstanding me bro.... See, we can't overthrow the criminally corrupt and pedophilic oligarchy, nor have legitimate democracy, because that would destabilize society... and as we all know, society is more stable when we protect criminals and pedophiles.
😳
-
-
I’ve heard this “if we expose them whatta-buh-bout collapse?” a few times now. And if you’re trying to tell me that the global system is predicated upon the ultra rich and powerful being able to traffick and serially abuse children and get away with it, that’s not a system worth saving.
Burn it down, to the water line, and start anew. Release the whole thing, not a redacted or doctored list to quell the MAGA revolt. Everyone who was ever on that island - from the wait staff to Bill Gates - needs to be investigated properly, cleared as appropriate, and punished as deserved.
-
Completely agree, and the stonkingly overinflated ego on them to even contemplate an inking of the idea that society would collapse just because some scummy paedo cunts get some well deserved comeuppance is astonishing.
Christ, fucking baboons do a better job keeping their societies running more smoothly then these kiddie fiddling chucklefucks.
Plus there would be many more people chomping at the bit to do their 'jobs', but do it better.Send the nonces to prison, fuck sake.
-
-
They're by definition NOT INNOCENT. Whatever happened to "drain the swamp"?
-
Whatever happened to "drain the swamp"?
It has been replaced by "Swamping the drain" long ago.
-
Don't shit where you eat, don't drain the swamp where you live
-
-
Lol yeah we couldn't possibly elect new reps. Gotta love conservatives and their static view of the world.
*This is Atlas Shrugged from what I understand (haven't read it). It's a handful of businessmen that grace the world, and without them the world can't function.
-
Is a government full of pedophiles worth saving?
No. The answer is no.
-
Funny, I thought that's what they believed, too. Now, suddenly they seem to think it's best to leave the global pedophile cabal in power.
-
-
wait wait wait lmao hold on, are you saying the political elite are too big to fail? we can’t allow pedophile rapists to be punished because they weaseled their way to the top? i’m not fucking following the logic of their anger.
-
It would in no way impede the stability of society, quite the opposite. Those are the very same people who are responsible for much of the instability. If the US were to start prioritising the public good over the profits of the oligarchy, 99.99% of society would benefit.
-
That's not collapse, that's just justice. That's people being held accountable for their crimes. Society is still going to function fine without them, their roles, if they even have any, will just be taken over by the next person in the command structure.
-
Or, better yet, we (as in society as a whole) can take the opportunity of clearing house to restructure our government (and, by extension, economic) systems to one where corrupt individuals cannot readily acquire hierarchical authority over others and entrench themselves behind layers of systemic powers.
Instead of an electoralist system where we elect representatives to dictate at their discretion which interests they will ultimately support for a federated system of syndicates where each has a set of delegates which have been assigned a specific responsibilities and expectations where, if those individuals are found to neglect their responsibilities, we can readily rescind their power of authority and replace them.
Power must come from the bottom up, otherwise we are slaves to the whims of those who wield authority from on high.
-
-
The world’s most powerful people going to prison would not cause the collapse of society. That is just not what society is. Even setting aside all hate for the 0.1% and judgments about whether they deserve prison, it’s just ridiculous to say that society depends on them. Who even wrote that line? Ayn Rand’s grandson?
-
They think they hold up society.
-
Yeah, if 2/3 of congress (and let's be honest, most pedos are GOP) and a bunch of CEOs disappeared for awhile literally nothing would be worse.
-
-
Imprisioned? Hardly. Not with their kind of money and influence. Some would go down. We already know lots of names on the list which aren't getting any serious time out of this.
-
Theses people think way too highly of themselves. All of them are easily replaceable.
-
If all of them went into their respective places of work tomorrow, locked themselves in and then all died of a gas leak, I wonder how long it would be before anyone would actually notice.
Much of the workings of a country are run by civil servants, etc who would still be there. They'd just get no new orders. People would still get paid. Shit would still get done.
It could be years before we find them.
-
It'll probably run smoother because civil servants are often bullied and disturbed by politicians and can't do their job properly.
-
-
-
I severely doubt society would collapse. I'm even willing to bet that it would begin to flourish. If people with power and control are willing to do these things to kids, imagine what they do to you even now with their executive powers.
I'm seriously wondering that if these people refuse to release the information, it's time to vote for these representatives with lead next. This cannot be tolerated and we need to ensure people are afraid to commit such atrocious crimes on our young.
-
You don't understand. When they say "society will collapse" they mean for them, not for us.
-
-
It is not the elites of society who keep the role turning, it's the workers.
-
But who's gonna tell the rubes what to do?
-
-
2/3rds of Congress? Is that why the vote to release the files was along party lines, with 211 Republicans voting to stop the release of the files? I think it's more like a simple majority of congress, lol.
-
I wouldn't be surprised if there were members of congress involved but the reason certain individuals are voting against the release is because the people paying the congressional reps are certainly on the list. Which does make them complicit and guilty but not an actual offender like trump, Clinton etc.
-
I wouldn't be surprised if some of the people on the list on the democrat side voted in favor of releasing them knowing that the republicans would vote it down anyways.
They just wanted the good optics.
-
Oh, cool satyrical comment about what a Republican would say.
And then a Democrat would say "by that logic, couldn't a mix of Republicans vote yes and Democrats vote no? Instead it's a clear partisan split like this problem only really effects one side, and everyone voting yes who would be impacted would then risk not only their career but the rest of their lives in the off chance it did pass."
-
-
-
Like the Panama papers?
-
Also The Conservative Alternative:
-
Ah yes, the world will collapse because of a problem that is almost exclusively in the USA.
On an unrelated note, have you ever heard of Americentrism?
-
If they can be destroyed by the truth, they absolutely must be destroyed by the truth.
From this point on, reporters should work off of the baseline assumption that everyone who voted not to release the documents are mentioned in the documents. Until proven otherwise.
-
I would imagine there are at least half a million people far more qualified and with more integrity to replace those dummys
-
Golly, how many important men participated in the r*pe of little girls?
It's like anyone who seeks public attention is a pervert!
-
How would it destroy innocent people? If releasing it would destroy them then they can't be innocent, can they? Guess he meant to say "innocent"
-
The worst thing that would happen would be the power vacuum it creates. I can totally see the Democrats splitting and a third party joining in, all fighting over what's left.
-
And that would most likely be an improvement.
-
-
would be imprisoned
Hahaha! Oh surely they aren't that naive! What about the world today makes them think anyone on that list will face ANY consequences, even if the list was released?
-
why do i feel like, when the files will be released, basically nothing will happen to the people that are on it?
-
"Right-wing pedophile apologists who elected a pedophile to the highest office in the land continue to apologize for pedophiles."
I need to take up drinking.
-
Yeah. The only thing I see wrong with this is not doing it. If my reps are kiddie diddlers, or kiddie diddler enablers, I'd like to know so we can kick their asses straight to jail. I don't really give a fuck if I need to participate in another election.
-
I hate how hopeful I am. I keep believing that at some point these people on the right are going to wake up and realize what they've voted for.
And I am continuously disappointed as they make more and more excuses for the criminal acts their leadership has committed each time they come to light.
-
=/ I have my doubts
-
i doubt it, they are "into deep" so they have to double down, or shift to something like "i never supported that." never have a self reflection to admit thier wrong thinking.
-
-
Nothing would collapse without those shit bags. If anything, it would thrive without lecherous pedos.
-
So we are at this point.
-
DO IT!
-
This is such embarrassing fantasy that it’s almost hard to believe that real people believe it, but traitor lunatics thrive on nonsense. This Epstein list is like the pizza parlor conspiracy.
-
Source please, I wanna read the whole thing
Edit: Found it
\ Posted on 2025-07-11T02:46Z
-
Newsweek said that O'Reilly said that Chat GPT said that you're a cunt.
But seriously, put those pedophiles in jail. We can elect new representatives. This wouldn't destabilize society.
-
Innocent?
-
Yeah, they're innocent people who do horrible crimes now and again, as a treat. But they're "good people™", so it's considered very impolite to even suggest consequences for them
As opposed to criminals, who are definitely guilty of something, so it's fine to punish them with or without evidence of any actual crime
This is genuinely how it works, it's just cartoonishly obvious now
-
-
yes no they won't get imprisoned, they will just be forced to pay pocket money
-
Yeah, ~28% of congress is female, so that would mean almost all of the men would be implicated. C'mon.
-
Why would you assume that the women aren't involved?
-
Because 99% of sex crimes are perpetrated by men.
https://www.humboldt.edu/supporting-survivors/educational-resources/statistics
-
-
111 comments