Mods do not enjoy "July 4 Celebrations"
Mods do not enjoy "July 4 Celebrations"
Mods are the Redcoats confirmed /j
64 comments
-
Rediculous. Rule 3 is be nice to each other but you didn't insult any other user
-
Twist: bezos is the mod edit: still PTB
-
-
Needs context of the community or at least of the "Rule 3".
-
"3. Be excellent to each other!"
Thread Link: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/19650117
-
I am not the OP but the rule 3 is be nice to each other. Not only it is too vague but i don't think Jeff Bezos
-
While I think the mod is just doing regular mod stuff; that is an overly broad rule to justify it.
I think one can argue that excellence to our fellow beings would be a revolution that burns all those houses down!
They need an anti insurrection rule on that community, to fit with their plain, vanilla, safe guidelines
-
-
PTB. I feel like the benefit to humanity would be much nicer than one dude continuing to leech off the planet.
-
Doesn't break rule 3, you weren't being mean to another user. PTB.
-
You not agreeing with the rules of the comm does not automatically translate to the mods power tripping.
-
The comment did not break rule 3
-
Power tripping = not agreeing with me
-
-
The man owns like 20 houses and you didn't specify the house he currently resides in so it's fine :3
-
Also it just got married. Its not at fucking home!
-
-
There are good reasons why this kind of language is restricted (even if I happen to believe we need real incentives for oligarchs).
-
The only good reason is to limit liability if someone breaks the law with their speech.
And it only breaks the law when that speech is undeniably organizing people to break the law. Simply wishing harm upon someone isn't a credible threat, and does not break the law.
I wish these pricks would jump off a cliff
Not illegal.
Hey, join me this Thursday to push rich people off the cliff located at the following GPS coords...
Illegal.
-
But the rule cited isn't about that. It's about fellow users.
-
64 comments