Skip Navigation

What are your thoughts on this meme? WOMEN ONLY COMMUNITY MEN PLEASE DO NOT COMMENT

WOMEN ONLY COMMUNITY MEN PLEASE DO NOT COMMENT

I totally get the joke, and Pedro can only be a good thing (huge fan, pray daily that he adopts me). But I do understand why some men would find it insulting. What's your thoughts?

82 comments
  • Eh, I get vaguely lesbiphobic vibes from that image, but I don't think it's intentional so I'll give it a pass. Also I prefer glorifying David Tennant.

    Pedro Pascal seems like a supportive sweetheart. Meanwhile it seems like David Tennant is the supporter who woke up and chose violence. Also he was really hot as Crowley, ngl. Sucks about Gaiman, Good Omens had some really strong queer vibes.

  • I don't think we have to consider men's opinions on every meme we create, they certainly don't consider women's opinions when they post misogynistic memes

    Having said that, this meme is very, very light ribbing, I think even a lot of men will agree that Pedro is especially attractive to women

  • This space is shifting into TERF territory real quick

    Looking at this meme for what it is, it's literally saying "#yesallmen *except Pedro, so I'm not a bigot <3"

    It's a really cowardly way to try on ideologies without acknowledging the blatantly harmful aspects

    And this space being for women is fine, but the mandatory requirement to say all men are excluded in every post title makes this space reek of the ways TERFs isolate and control women.

    • but the mandatory requirement to say all men are excluded in every post title makes this space reek of the ways TERFs isolate and control women.

      It's not mandatory, and it's motivated by so many men commenting on posts in this community, which takes up a lot of time and effort to remove.

      The motivation to put the rule in the title of the post is because so many men don't read the rules or notice what community they're in before posting, this helps them be aware and reduces the workload of the moderators.

      I hear you on how it can look or seem TERFy, but I think this might just be a misunderstanding, we are explicitly trans inclusive.

    • Thanks for your feedback! Dont worry we don't do that in every post, but we've sadly had manosphere commenters brigade posts like this in the past. I've found it's best to prevent issues with the title. ❤️

  • Speaking as a trans woman: This meme in particular? Just seems like lighthearted fun, using a joke to praise somebody for being a good person.
    But sometimes people take it too far, and the limit for me is when it's treated like there are zero exceptions, all men are bad.
    I didn't draw that line arbitrarily. I have lived experience that shows the "all men are trash" crowd are far less likely to treat me as a woman, and more likely to view me as a now vulnerable man who they have an opportunity to take revenge on. Things like laughing at me for having problems they'd be supporting other women for. My mom used to have a friend like that, who laughed and gave me the classic "welcome to being a woman" every time I brought up things like not being able to go home for a while one day because a car tried to follow me there, or when disruptions in my hormone treatment lead to pain and emotional instability.

  • Oooo I think this might be my field of expertise...

    Great analysis but I'm pretty sure this is just a hornypost.

    This feels like the sort of hyperbolic statement that under analysis is very strange because the idea because the words come from a more primitive part of the brain.

    I find it interesting because I don't get quasi-philisophical when horny. For me those parts of my brain are separate "voices". I don't know if that's an autism thing or what

  • I don't really like them. I don't think it's a huge deal, but, iit bums me out.

  • It's excruciating how so many people have missed point of this light hearted meme about a seemingly nice man, and turned it into a bunch of virtue signaling negativity.

    This is exactly why I left tumblr.

82 comments