Based on a true conversation
Based on a true conversation
Based on a true conversation
Who made this and thought "yeah this is readable. Definitely keep all caps and the font that nearly every character just looks like a block"
I swear the internet hates dyslexic people.
Here's the comment that OP got it from; should be more readable. You can also read the rest of the exchange to see how much of an ass OP made of themselves if you like.
I’ve got to add; anyone engaging Satan'smaggotycumfart in a serious discussion is in for a bad time. They are a deeply unserious person. Catch them in a meme or comedy instance and they are totally fine though.
Wait. OP posted this as an "own". Wow. OP is delusional.
You really think this makes progressives look bad? Why has your entire output on this platform become shitting on progressives for not doing enough when they are the ones doing the most?.
I suppose I should thank you for giving my comment more reach, it seems that more people need to hear this.
Edit: Adding another comment I made to address the point you seem to be clumsily making with this post:
The reason MAGA was able to take over the GOP so easily while the progressives have struggled to take over the DNC is because MAGA had (and still has) the backing of several large donors and owners of mainstream media. The entire mainstream media apparatus has been outright hostile to progressives until very recently, and even now they are reluctant to give full support.
The fact is that Progressives have a much harder fight than fascists because our ideas represent a tangible threat to the wealth and privilege of those in power while fascists' ideas only threaten the powerless (at least at first, many of these wealthy people who are complicit in the rise of fascism will find themselves against the wall too eventually, but they are shortsighted).
MAGA took over the entire government so remind me how the progressives are doing the most, please?
Holy shit it's like talking to a brick wall. Is it not possible in your mind for someone to be doing more and achieving less? You want to maybe respond to the points I made about how progressives have to do everything without media or financial support while MAGA has had the backing of extremely wealthy people?
Beyond that, progressives don't just lack support from wealthy donors, the wealthy actively oppose everything we do and even regularly smear us in the media. If you're such a smart guy and know what we should be doing, why aren't you doing it? I promise you progressives are open to new ideas, we're trying everything and then some.
Do you know HOW MAGA took over the Republican party? They went out and did rallies. They campaigned in working class areas. They did town halls. They went on podcasts. They used social media. And most importantly, they ran primary challenges against Republican incumbents who didn't get in line with their messaging.
So, what are progressives doing? They're doing exactly what MAGA did, to take over the Republican party.
almost as if you cant move a corporate funded party left
To be clear, David Hogg has a single issue, guns. He doesn't give two shits about opposing Trump or supporting progressives, all he cares about is eliminating guns (understandable given the circumstance).
If Trump returned to his old stance of "take the firearms first and then go to court, you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second."
https://time.com/5184160/trump-guns-due-process/?xid=homepage
Hogg would be 110% down for that.
We're not giving up our right to self-defense, and can work with David Hogg to elect progressive Democrats and make comprehensive health care, including mental, and other appropriate social programs in place to address unnecessary violence.
2 things missing that are more important than any of that:
Endless money and the freedom to lie endlessly. When you have standards, things take longer. Doing otherwise forms a weak government akin to fascism where you need an enemy at all times.
s/MAGA/Tea Party/g. Trump's MAGA doesn't get credit for that.
We do need a Guillotine Party to do the same thing to the Democrats.
David Hogg is trying to get primary challengers for some worthless old incumbents, yes. The problem is that he's not trying to get rid of all the worthless old incumbents. He idolizes Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and most of the corporate centrists that destroyed the party. He wants to replace old, do-nothing incumbents with young, corporate centrists, not progressives. David Hogg is part of the problem, not the solution.
Even if the tea party and MAGA are different does it matter now?