The party has... changed a bit.
The party has... changed a bit.
7 comments
-
Explanation: In 1865, Radical Republicans were called such because of their radically pro-civil rights platform, including the abolition of slavery and total legal equality for Black Americans. They were later be instrumental in passing Federal anti-segregation laws (which, unfortunately, were struck down by the Supreme Court).
... I could not guarantee the same for 2021 'radical' Republicans.
-
I just want to point out that a lot of the early Abolitionists were anti-slavery because slavery lowered the wages of free people. A slave owner could hire out his slaves to other people for a lower wage than any free person could afford. And many slaves were skilled craftsmen. There was no point in learning a trade like carpentry or blacksmithing if there were slaves who could be hired for half the wage.
-
Hire slaves for half the wage?
I'm apperently unclear on the concept of 1800s slaves. I thought they recieved zero pay, and did what they were told.
Also, I never quite understood how that worked anyways. These slaves were picked from African nations, largely which did not speak english. I was taught they were intentionally kept illiterate to hinder escape attempts, as they wouldn't be able to read local street signs or maps.
But if that's true, and you said "Slave, pick up these logs, and move them over there!" but they don't speak english, wouldn't the result be a blank look on their face as you just spoke jibberish from their perspective?
And now you say the slaves are being paid, admittingly low wages, but still paid. Which goes against the core concept of what I thought slavery was back then.
-
-
-
Not only are they no longer the party of Lincoln, they're no longer the party of Eisenhower.
7 comments