You're viewing a single thread.
What impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
22 0 ReplyI think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn't hurt. Where's Mario?
16 0 ReplyWhy stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
7 1 ReplyNo no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
9 1 ReplyThat's definitely a more productive solution
6 0 Reply“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
6 0 Reply
Sounds like a convenient excuse to make everything a rental, or to just tear down all vacant homes.
You can't expect these people to sit by an issue they can toss money at to make better for them.
2 0 Reply
everything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
6 1 ReplyInsurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
9 0 Replyanytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.
6 0 Reply
Probably not. At their level it's probably self insured, so they lose the money.
2 0 ReplySomeone will lose money, but it won't be blackrock
2 0 Reply