Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner refused to sign memo saying Trump was not antisemitic, book says
Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner refused to sign memo saying Trump was not antisemitic, book says
Pair declined to give public endorsement of Trump in wake of 7 October attacks, All or Nothing by Michael Wolff reveals
Summary
Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner refused to sign a statement saying Donald Trump was not antisemitic, according to Michael Wolff’s new book “All or Nothing.”
The couple previously served as senior advisers but distanced themselves after the January 6 attack.
Wolff claims Trump sought their “Jewish cover” following his ambiguous stance on Israel post-October 7 Hamas attacks.
Kushner dodged repeated requests for a formal endorsement, eventually declining to label Trump as non-antisemitic.
Jared got his money from the Saudis and now has no use for Trump. Donnie threw Ivanka's mom in a hole in the ground to get a tax break. Loyalty runs in that clan.
You’d think Trump would be a bit nicer given his comments about her…
(negative)n in title, i'm lost again.
Let's disentangle this mess :
Statement "A" :
Trump ≠ (anti-semitic = Hate_Jews™)
//
(( Ivanka Trump + Jared Kushner →
Trump's relatives )) . (refused to sign ≈ deny ) . ("A")
→
Trump's relatives (deny he does not) hate Jews //(in memo that is in book)
→.
≈ Trump's relatives : "He hates Jews".This is a useful comment for those who part computer.
Once again i struggle understanding a simple English sentence. please help me :
(...) who part computer.
1st interpretation would be written differently for me ... i would write it like :
"for those who are part human, part computer" so i would have to reject that one.2nd interpretation would be reading "part" as a verb ... like dividing something into parts. So : "taking a computer into many pieces"
Since I'm not sure how this second interpretation works, i start doubting my capacity and believe there might be a third interpretation ...