Even without the USA, Nato would still win in a fight
Even without the USA, Nato would still win in a fight
The numbers don’t lie. But would Nato have the endurance to win in the long run?
You're viewing a single thread.
That article mentions “nuclear” once.
I believe when facing NATO, Russia would not hesitate to use tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield.
NATO vs Russia is a completely different conflict without the US in NATO.
France and UK have nukes too.
I don't think russia would use nukes. That would open them up to retaliatory nuking. France and Britain both have nukes and the russian border is a lot more porous and a lot longer than the european ones. Much easier to get a nuke to moscow than to london.
France and uk have plenty enough nukes to assure the mutual destruction of russia.
Only if nato attacks, which it won't do as it's a defense pact.
I'm not saying NATO would but they did intervene in Kosovo. That was not defensive. There's some wiggle room in being a defensive pact.
Fair point, I actually don't know how the USA got involved in Kosovo.