That makes sense. Though at geological scales the distinction between solid and non-solid blurs a bit. Mountains are not solid to a slow enough observer.
Depends on the compressive strength of the material. Sooner or later the weight of the pyramid above the base exceeds the base's ability to support it. Considering that a mountain is basically a stone pyramid, Everest has to be in the neighbourhood of how tall you could go -- call it 10-12 kilometers high. Other materials would do better.
I'm not convinced Mt Everest represents the most weight normal earth can sustain but rather the most height gained by regular tectonic motion. However, I stead of asking how much weight can stony earth support before collapsing, it leads me to ask how much weight can the crust support before buckling? Perhaps this project has diminishing returns as more weight above causes the crust to bulge downward and compensate.
This made me think "WHEEEE!" when I imagined riding along, and that made me think of the longest cocktail party from the hitchhiker guide to the galaxy. So thanks I guess.
Yes, but it doesn't matter enough. The square-cube law means that the mass being supported goes up faster than the area of the layer doing the supporting does. So each additional brick on the bottom still ends up carrying more weight as the pyramid gets taller.
For the first 10 km or so, with current technology, it's possible to imagine a very light structure in part composed of big impermeable fabric envelope filled with hydrogen that would have a net weight of about zero because of buoyancy in air.
The difficult part is the next 90 kilometers high for which i believe we wouldn't be able to build anything that could sustain its own weight.
On the other hand, if cost and energy was not an issue, with current technology, we could build enormous number of big tanks into which we would pump all the atmosphere, so the height of space would come down to sea level.
... of course we would then have also to put oceans and all bodies of water in tanks, otherwise they would boil out into space.
Calling Egyptians "African" is very Euro-centric thinking that makes the African continent a monolith of culture, when it is hundreds or thousands of cultures.
You might as well say the Mayan people were Mexicans.
Basically as tall as tallest mountains - 8km before gravity starts overcoming the materials. Using stronger materials would allow building higher, but not too much
Oh there are many wild ideas.. I don't know of any other pyramid shaped ones though.
For other shapes, I think The Line in Saudi Arabia is worth a mention, because it's actually being built. Slave labour and other issues aside, it's interesting that they attempt to follow through on such an insane plan.