+1 for tumbleweed. Swapped to it from Ubuntu a few years back and it's been great. Up-to-date everything, very stable, built in recovery just in case the last update had some regressions. Highly recommend
I fully second the sentiment that there is no good reason to switch distribution once you have found one that you like.
However, if your goal is to learn something new, and you don't care about having to nuke the install and start over, then you could go the crazy route and install Linux From Scratch. It is unlikely to yield a maintainable result at first try, but if learning is your goal, this is your best shot at it.
Or you could go the not-that-crazy route and use Gentoo, which is basically Linux From Scratch, but automated. Setting it up is way quicker (couple of hours - except if you configure the kernel by hand), and you will with near certainty get a maintainable system on first try, but it is also far less educational, given that the automation does most of the work for you. (I have switched from Debian to Gentoo 10 years ago, after trying it on my netbook for some time, and I could not be happier. It only does what it should, is rolling release, and only very rarely has issues.)
I would only recommend those two approaches on a second PC though, without immediately switching the main PC over. Linux From Scratch is, as said, unlikely to yield a maintainable installation on first try, so you will likely nuke the install again. Gentoo, while perfectly usable as a daily driver, is certainly not everyone's beer, and you might simply want to switch away again because you don't like it.
I am using Bazzite with Gnome as a first linux distro after windows and its been a pretty seamless transition. I did run into some trouble with the bazzite packaged installer so I installed fedora, then rebased to bazzite but since then its been great as a dd.
Keep in mind that 1060 will give you a lot of headache for games using DirectX 12. If you can, get an RTX 20 series or GTX 16 series card, or dual boot with Windows.
YMMV... but in my experience that whole "time to maintain arch"-idea is overstated.
I defintiely spend less time on issues like "oh, there's a bug. let's role that update back and try again in 6-24 hours when it's fixed" or "defaults changed in a new version, let's take a quick look at the changes" on arch than on annoying bugs persisting for years in fixed distros. And that's before calculating the whole "distro upgrade every otehr year"-stuff. Which likes to kill a whole weekend at least and barely ever works (followed by the same "oh, defaults changed" but now on dozens of components at the same time).
And because of that second point in particular even if archlinux wouldn't be my choice I could never go back to a non-rolling release.
Thinking about making the move from Pop!_OS. Pop has been good, and it's not like I need to be on the latest thing, but it's still on Gnome 42 I think. Pop is starting to feel a bit long in the tooth.
Based onUbuntu : PopOS (not so sure about its current state, their cosmic desktop isn't released yet)
Beginner friendly : Mint, most of gaming distro (cachy might be a bit more advanced )
I do not know much about the current state of snaps, so I won't recommend Ubuntu and derivatives (kubuntu, Xubuntu...). I guess it is easier to use .deb now, but I can't call beginner friendly a distro that require terminal or tweaks to change packages you can install on it.
I recsntly set up my PC again and had fomo when selecting a distro.
First ai helped to choose, just tell it what your requirements are.
Second, its Linux. After the installiert you can do whatever you want with it. Just pick one if the 3 best fitting ones