Transgender girls who want to play high school sports in Utah will now have to meet a set of health standards more stringent than those for professional athletes competing in the Olympics or the NCAA.
Summary
Utah has introduced strict guidelines for transgender girls in high school sports, requiring testosterone levels below 66 ng/dl—far stricter than NCAA or Olympic standards—and proof of ongoing gender-affirming care, which was banned in the state in 2023.
Critics argue the rules effectively bar all transgender girls from participating, contradicting the law’s intent to only ban cases of safety or competitive advantage.
Advocates warn the policy harms trans youth by excluding them from the mental health and social benefits of sports.
What's weird is that qons keep bleating that donvict was "good at economy" or something of that nature. What a fucking load that is. If it was even remotely true, I might see how these dumbasses might use "but mah eggs!" as an excuse, but the record of donvict's first term in reality is absolutely abysmal. But I guess if donvict and those around him keep repeating stupid meaningless mantras like "promises made, promises kept", I guess enough intellectual lightweights will buy into it.
I suppose if one of the promises was to kill more Americans than anyone in history, I guess that was kept?
Very many I'll bet. The medically accepted "normal" range for free T in women is 15 to 70 ng/dl (quick and dirty google), so 66 is already inside of that. And thats not counting the huge swath of women with pcos/endo/etc disorders that tend to result in higher T as well.
Not sure how T works in women, but men who workout and are physically active also produce more. If it's similar that will put more in the top end of that range.
I can also guarantee some testing company owned by a Republican is now salivating at the idea of testing every girl. Lobbying probably won't even be hard, just say "secret trans" and Republicans will be chomping at the bit to pass that law.
While these laws are expressly exclusionary, the overall intent is to erode civil rights protections. It's easier for them to argue against civil rights when they can present a legal justification for it.
How long before you need a Doohicky license, and they just don’t issue Doohickey licenses because it’s not a real. Just submit form G8–217. OK, where do I get the form? That’s the neat part, you don’t!
Exactly. That's what's so callously ridiculous about it. That T level, 66 ng/dl, is quite achievable by trans women with the proper treatment. Puberty blockers or T-blockers and E? That's quite doable. It would be a quite reasonable bar for most trans women to reach for.
Except, they then of course outlawed that treatment for minors.
At least there’s a way for them to compete in the sports of their gender. In many red states, it’s just banned with no thought of doing this. I wish it wasn’t more strict than the NCAA, but at least it’s better than other red states.
I could see some company cashing in on this and saying you need to test all girls for secret trans... and then I picking up girls with PCOS and other disorders that change testosterone levels.
Do you have any idea just how expensive it would be to do testing on every athlete?
There were 7.8 million student athletes in the US last year and the average cost of a testosterone test is 70 - 100 bucks. Even using conservative estimations, you'd need to spend half a BILLION dollars PER YEAR to accomplish this. And the worst part? Do you know how many of those 7.8 million were trans students? Five.
I am not saying we should, but if apparently it needs to be done, we should rethink categories and classes more broadly, not in “boys” or “girls” terms.
Why? 90% of high level athletics is genetics. Basically all your top athletes started out with a massive advantage over the general public. That is why Olympic gold and 4th+ place can be separated by a fraction of a second because everyone is amazing.
If we are banning girls with high T shall we also ban the tall ones too?
Wait can you rephrase or cite another voice on what you are saying here. You come off as a reactionary conservative here but your below comments suggest to me you are actually a lot more normal and you just wrote your thoughts in a way that confused people so they downvoted. /gen