-
I appreciate the fact that the distro community is diverse enough to accommodate even people whose personal preferences are this objectively wrong. ;)
-
My personal list is short:
- Debian (Testing) - evertything works OOTB. Great performance. Stable. Plenty of current packages. Works on my workstation, laptop, RPi.
- FreeBSD ;) - if you really want an alternative.
-
With the number of atrocities that manjaro has committed, it should be crucified. https://manjarno.snorlax.sh
-
PopOS is not too far off from a DeCanonicalled Ubuntu with extensions. It is little more than the Gnome extensions it contains, and the project could just as easily be just the
pop-desktoppackage. They ship a year old desktop and it is rather unrefined.-
a DeCanonicalled Ubuntu with extensions
You say that like it's a bad thing. Flatpak and no snaps by default is pretty decent
They ship a year old desktop
Wait until you hear what Linux Mint uses lol. Also, it's no rolling release but they do keep packages and the kernel up to date
-
I don’t know. I just feel it is better suited to be maybe a script and extensions, rather than an entire distro.
-
-
-
Wait a minute. Since when are LXQt and XFCE "Distributions" ?
I don't even know what that vaguely gear-like one in the top tier is, or the one next to the geeko in the second tier are.
(Just as a sidenote, as one of the openSUSE LXQt maintainers, and sometimes LXQt Upstream contributor, if we're providing our own distro somewhere, this is the first I've heard of it.)
-
I apologize, I meant to include Lubuntu, not LXQt in the logo.
-
-
Why's pop so low? I haven't used Linux for a while, but I recall liking it.
-
Most likely personal preference; some people really dislike heavily customized DEs out of the box, and some prefer faster releases than PopOS has.
-
Somewhat correct. For other reasons refer to this comment.
-
-
