Skip Navigation

Trump and Vance face criminal charges over Springfield hoax

115 comments
  • Tempted to remove as "Fox by Proxy" but here's an alternate source which confirms the story and raises an excellent point:

    https://www.npr.org/2024/09/25/g-s1-24436/haitian-group-charges-trump-vance-springfield

    “If it were anyone else other than Trump and Vance who had done what they’ve done — wreak havoc on Springfield, resulting in bomb threats, evacuated and closed government buildings and schools, threats to the mayor and his family — they would have been arrested by now,” Chandra said. “They are not above the law.”

    Chandra said the U.S. Supreme Court's July ruling granting ex-presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution does not apply in this case because Trump is currently a private citizen and Vance was not acting in his capacity as a senator when he amplified the rumors that members of Springfield’s 15,000-member Haitian community were eating people’s pets.

    • "If it were anyone else ... they would have been arrested by now,” Chandra said. “They are not above the law.”

      Those two sentences don't add up.

  • @just_another_person@lemmy.world Looks like Rawstory heard the complaints and modified the headline on you.

    The new headline is "Trump and Vance face criminal charges over Springfield hoax"

    If you could make this match, that would be great!

  • Stochastic terrorism needs to have more severe criminal penalties for career politicians specifically. Right-wing figureheads have been getting away with this shit for too long.

    We're now penalizing the parents of school shooters, so if we find out that someone who threatens to bomb a school is a super fan of X person, then X person should face some sort of penalty if they continually put out deliberate lies about said school. We did a version of this with Alex Jones already, just follow through with that logic honestly.

115 comments