Skip Navigation
77 comments
  • Pelia had better sing.

    • For those who don't know, Carol Kane (though not particularly known as a singer) has sung on Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and has appeared in the US tour of the musical Wicked as Madame Morrible.

  • @ValueSubtracted

    We'll see... Can't say I'm stoked, but maybe it'll be better than I anticipate. I'm not really a fan of musicals in the first place. I could count the ones I find 'acceptable' on one hand, and can only think of two atm. If it turns out merely 'acceptable' I'll be happy enough. Hopefully the actors had fun.

  • I'm getting Buffy "Once More With Feeling" vibes, especially with that font at the end. Loving it!

  • Ugh… why..!! Lets sing about this monster that eats children and farts fire lalalala. Ugh..

    The show is good why fuck it up

    • You obviously feel very strongly about this.

      Have you considered bursting into song to give your feelings full expression?

  • I mean, come on! Star Trek is about exploring strange new worlds, seeking out new life and new civilizations, not bursting into song at the drop of a hat. What's next? A dance-off with the Klingons? A Romulan rap battle?

    I've stuck with this franchise through thick and thin, through the highs of "The Wrath of Khan" and the lows of "Nemesis." I've even tolerated the questionable decisions in the recent series. But this... this is a bridge too far.

    Star Trek is not Glee. It's not High School Musical. It's a science fiction show with a rich history and a dedicated fanbase who appreciate the serious themes and complex narratives it often explores. Turning it into a musical spectacle is a slap in the face to fans like me who have been with the series from the beginning.

    I can't help but feel this is a desperate attempt to appeal to a younger audience, a misguided effort to stay relevant in today's saturated TV landscape. But at what cost? The integrity of the franchise? The respect of its long-time fans?

    I'm not against innovation or trying new things. But there's a line, and this musical episode crosses it. It's a gimmick, a cheap trick that undermines the very essence of what Star Trek is all about.

    I've been a Star Trek fan for over 60 years, and I've never been more disappointed. This is not the Star Trek I fell in love with. This is not the Star Trek Gene Roddenberry envisioned. This is not my Star Trek.

    So, to the producers of "Star Trek: Brave New Worlds," I say this: Boldly go back to the drawing board. Because this idea? It's highly illogical.

    • @yarr @startrek Let’s get back to serious episodes, like with 1920s gangsters, or fuzzy animals that purred.

      • Agreed! Let's stick to exploring strange new worlds and seeking out new civilizations. And maybe throw some fights into the mix too. It's time we stop trying to appeal to the "younger crowd" by turning everything into a musical. There's no shame in being nerdy and loving science fiction. We can have fun while still staying true to the franchise's core values. I think that's why so many people love Star Trek in the first place. Furthermore, if the producers are looking for ways to make their show more relevant, they should focus on telling deeper, more meaningful stories instead of resorting to gimmicks. That's what makes a good TV show great - compelling narratives that resonate with viewers on an emotional level. I hope they take our feedback seriously and return to making quality content that honors the legacy of Star Trek. For now, let's all agree to never speak of this musical episode ever again lest we forget what made us fall in love with this incredible series in the first place. Let's end this thread on a high note, shall we? 😊 Here's to hoping the next season of Star Trek is one we can all be proud of!

77 comments