1y ago

Twitter adding daily limits to DMs for users without Blue

We'll soon be implementing some changes in our effort to reduce spam in Direct Messages. Unverified accounts will have daily limits on the number of DMs they can send. Subscribe today to send more messages

https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1682501248334061572

68 comments

This is an awesome thing, it encourages people up get off their site
- Twitter could implement a feature where you could only read like 25 tweets a week and Twitter would still somehow survive
  
  But then likely only the musk fanbase and maybe a few confused are the only left
- I think you're giving "normal people" way too much credit.

Ah yes, it’s “to fight spam” and not at all an attempt to cut costs of the free users.
Just keep squeezing Elon. Blood will come out of that stone soon enough I just know it!!
- This won't do anything to cut any costs.
  This is all about enshittifying the free experience to push those on the edge to finally bite the bullet and start paying.

Kinda pointless when most of the spam I encounter in general is from verified accounts. Love that doucheblock extension, and Blue Blocker for automuting accounts that promote tweets.
- well I just checked the twitter replies and am now adding “sugar daddy”, “sugar momma” and “sugar baby” to doucheblock. They can’t even handle spam replies to the support account.

I remember the conspiracy theory that was going on in the right wing circles of the internet a few years ago, where people like Tim Pool were saying that the blue checkmark was an attempt from Twitter to create a "privileged class on Twitter"...
All of those people are the ones that Elon's been pandering so hard to and look at Twitter now.
Why is it with these people, that them who cry wolf so often, also turns out to be the wolves so often?

It seems crazy that Twitter is actively taking steps to become a worse social media company. Back when I was a kid, companies were supposed to be these well thought out, highly methodical entities that would only make the most optimal moves. I suppose it's 2023 now though.
- Look up enshittitication, it's an interesting rabbit hole.
  Basically, the idea is that there is a path companies go along where they first please users to build a user base, once you are bound to a platform and don't want to leave (because "everyone" is there) they instead start to shift towards pleasing advertisers until they also feel trapped (because "everyone" advertises there). The final move is trying to squeeze as much as possible out of all these trapped people and companies. It's not just social media, although this of course makes it most obvious at least for a trapped user base. But this also applies for any other big thing that "evryone" uses.
  
  "Enshittification" isn't a rabbit hole, it's a term made up by a pretty hacky young adult sci-fi author like a few months ago for behavior that has been happening and documented in capitalism for at least a century.
  
  This looks more like trining to make it run in a stolen raspberry pi in Elon’s basement than trining to extract value.
  Let’s be real, there is no value left to extract.
- Even more interesting is that Reddit is taking a look at it and saying huh that looks good I'll have the same thing
- Dude, that was never a thing. Companies are run by humans. Humans are dumb.

Ah yes, because spammers clearly can't afford 8 bucks a month
- Spammers definitely can't afford creating 1000 accounts and paying 0 bucks a month... /s

This will have an impact on journalists who use Twitter to get tips for reporting. Seen some who were concerned this would happen
- Also many companies provide tech support via Twitter (e.g. PayPal).
  I also wanted to add that ZSSK (Slovakian state-owned passenger train company) uses Twitter for reporting extraordinary events like trains being very late, cancelled, alternative bus transport (which can be pretty important as buses can't always get to each station), etc., but checking zssk.sk I noticed they switched from Twitter to Mastodon after these recent events.
  
  I had a problem with my family account on Spotify and my options for asking for support were twitter dms or some meta stuff (Facebook dms?)
  I was 🤏🏻 this close to cancel my account right there, but my partner still has social media accounts, so they solved it in my name.
  Get a freaking email inbox…
  
  Good thing they switched, want others to follow. From what i got especcially people in eurobean countries are hopping on mastodon
- I'm more concerned with "journalists who use Twitter to get tips for reporting".
  Like, isn't a journalist supposed to contrast and verify information? Not just spin some random tips from Twitter?
  
  A tip isn't a story in itself, it's a suggestion of where to start looking for one. "Hey, I'm off the record here, but some shady shit is going down at my job and you might want to fire off a Freedom of Information request for x, y and z or talk to a and b" is a pretty good tip.

"in our effort to reduce spam"
... Sure... That's the reason.....

More ideas for Spez to use on Reddit.

I like how social media companies are starting to embrace the Fediverse.

Does anyone even use Twitter for anything other than dumb ass politics and seeing free nudes of their favorite e-thot anymore? I don’t think I’ve seen anything entertaining on there in years.
- Many absolutely cracked artists post on Twitter and nowhere else, that's the only reason I've ever used it.
- I have a list on there with National Geographic and other accounts that only post interesting things, barely any political stuff. Space and other photography. Trolls don’t appear much there.
  Probably the only reason I still open it now and then.
- I post my photos there because I reach a significantly wider audience on twitter than instagram. Zero politics on my feed
- it used to be where i would message my girlfriend (i dont know why twitter thats just how it ended up), but after a few years we made the switch to discord (for now) due to the incoming limits
- There are some fandom authors still posting their art on Twitter, some more spicy than others... guess not all are nudes?
- I mean hardcore gay porn. Who wants pics of thots?

Well, it's time for their users to consider moving to mastodon / fediverse

Oh no! Anyway...

Somebody is getting real desperate over there.

Yeah that's super fucked up. Who the hell thinks this shit is a good idea. I'm so tired.

At this point, who even cares? Are there still people on Twitter? Just move on and use something else.
- Or don't. The whole concept of Twitter is just noise generation.

What's the limit? As long as it's high I can see this as decent anti spam idea.
- It'd make for a good anti-spam measure if there was a limit to the number of DMs users could send to other people who don't follow them back. It'd mean people can still use Twitter DMs like a normal messaging service (which isn't something I care for, but I know some people use it like that).
  As it is, it just feels similar to the whole "rate limiting the number of tweets people can view per day" thing, where they're taking the most obvious route to reducing bandwidth usage by restricting users.
  
  I haven't yet once reached that limit though. Probably doesn't affect the vast majority of normal users and I'd imagine same applies to this DM limit aswell.
- Probably whatever number Elon arbitrarily decides he thinks maximizes the conversion rate to premium.
  
  In that case, it'll definitely be 69 for new accounts and 420 for established accounts. He's predictable.
- Agreed. Most private messages I get are from fake accounts that probably spam the same message to hundreds of other users aswell.

Nice, putting existing features behind paywalls..

68 comments