Apparently controversial, in this day and age
Apparently controversial, in this day and age
You're viewing a single thread.
253 comments
-
it's not controversial, what is controversial is what is being defined as genocide. Classic mischaracterization.
Now i'm not going to get into the immediate debate about whether or not this is an active genocide or not, because frankly, not my fucking problem.
what i will get into is the commonly accepted definition of genocide, which is in past tense. It's also commonly used to specifically denote a certain ethnicity, which considering that israel is indiscriminately bombing, i'm not sure how much that applies. I feel like considering palestinian an ethnicity would be like considering a US state to be an ethnicity as well. Though i'm sure there is historical merit to that statement, the complexities of it are not something i'm intimately familiar with so i won't say much on it.
Regardless, I think palestine is realistically entitled to it's own nation, i see no reason for it not to be. Israel, arguably is also entitled to it's own nation, i see no reason for it not to be either.
It'd be cool if israel and hamas stopped committing war crimes, but considering that this is a war in the middle east, i don't know when that will happen.
-
ethnicity
¦the quality or fact of belonging to a population group or subgroup made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent.
Of course it's an ethnicity. The mental fucking gymnastics you genocides defenders come up with.
because frankly, not my fucking problem.
We live in a global, interconnected society. Yes, it is your fucking problem, no matter how indirectly.
First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists And I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews And I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me
-
the quality or fact of belonging to a population group or subgroup made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent.
so technically this more closely matches the definition of ethnic, rather than ethnicity, but ethnicity is just the specific designation of an ethnic group, so meh.
from my understanding around the local area to Palestine and Israel, is that Palestine (and Israel as well) are more legally and specifically defined, than ethnically defined. You could argue that Palestinian would be an ethnicity, but like i said, is the entire state of Wyoming also an ethnicity? Indiana locals are Hoosiers, yet they don't ascribe to a certain ethnicity. Like i said i just don't know enough about the local area to be able to classify it more properly.
In fact, the basic internet resources seem to affirm this, googling Palestine brings up two primary results (for me at least) Palestine: the geographical area (unrelated to ethnicity) and the state of Palestine: the country (presumably also unrelated to ethnicity)
"Half of the Palestinian population are diaspora and refugees." also pulled from the same resource, uses Palestinian to refer to the people who "are a member of Palestine" rather than an ethnicity. Historically this is what ethnicity means, but i don't believe that Palestine, over the last 50 years of it's literally global timeline, has remained to be Palestinian, i'm almost certain it's floated away over time, as things tend to do in systems of entropy.
this is from wikipedia, so not a guaranteed source of truth but it seems that Palestine is Arab, which would make Palestine ethnically Arab, ignoring the minority communities. From what i can tell, and from what i expect, Palestine seems to be a cultural melting pot of sorts, so i'm really not sure the term genocide applies here at all.
The mental fucking gymnastics you genocides defenders come up with.
it's really not, is an individual state in the US considered to be it's own ethnicity? Genuine question.
We live in a global, interconnected society. Yes, it is your fucking problem, no matter how indirectly.
and yet, i only speak English, how many languages do you speak? I only live in the US, where do you live? I only have experience with western US society because i haven't been anywhere else. Where have you been?
With all due sincerity, i do not fucking know shit out most of the world outside of the US, it's literally not my place to make governmental decisions for the UK, or Ireland for example. Do i want Israel and Palestine to be at war? No, same as i don't want Ukraine and Russia to be at war, am i going to tell them what to do? No, it's not my fucking land, and it's not my fucking government. This is literally not my problem to answer.
The western society, the US in particular has issues with over projecting power and influence into eastern society and expecting it to work, it doesn't time after time. Why are we expecting this to be any different?
genocides defenders
also to be clear, you are quite literally pulling this out of your ass, because i'm not even sure this would be classified as a genocide, it might be. And here you are arguing that i am quite literally defending it, even though the only thing i contest is what these actions are constituted as. Whether or not i think it's genocide or not doesn't magically make all the people dying go away. You're the one doing that conflation here, not me.
also, cool reference to the nazis, once Israel turns to Egypt and starts bombing them indiscriminately or something, i'll believe you.
-
You genocide defending fucks make me sick to my stomach.
"More legally and specifically" as if "ethnicity" isn't well defined in international law. gtfo noob.
it’s really not, is an individual state in the US considered to be it’s own ethnicity? Genuine question.
Does the state share cultural and historical background with the rest of the NATION-STATE they belong to? Yes. They do. They share a cultural and historical background.
am i going to tell them what to do? No, it’s not my fucking land, and it’s not my fucking government. This is literally not my problem to answer.
So if you lived a hundred years ago, you would say that the Nazis aren't on "your land" and thus "literally not your problem to answer"?
We live in an global interconnected world and you bet your goddamn stinky arse that it's also your problem, no matter how indirectly. The war in Ukraine isn't your land, thus "literally not your problem", right?
Russia's war in Ukraine has caused significant disruption to global wheat markets. Wheat prices are estimated to increase by around 2% globally.
And that's a very simple example (for what I assume is a very simple person), but people could list literally thousands of ways how this is your problem as well.
because i’m not even sure this would be classified as a genocide, it might be.
Do you live under a fucking rock?
https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192
The motherfucking INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT has said there are "reasonable grounds" for a genocide, and their standard of proof is a bit higher than some random asshole online who admits they don't know anything about anything that's outside of America.
In the South Africa v. Israel Order, the Court was unable to draw on reports from UN human rights investigative bodies for its factual assessment, as none exist yet. However, for potential incitement to genocide and possible genocidal intent, it referred directly to statements made by Israeli President Herzog, Defence Minister Gallant, and (then) Energy Minister Katz. Furthermore, the Court took into account statements by UN bodies (such as OCHA, WHO, CERD), high-ranking UN officials (like the Under Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator and the Commissioner-General of UNRWA), and UN experts. Overall, plausibility emerges as a notably flexible standard, contingent upon the specific rights, claims, and factual circumstances presented before the Court.
ICC case-law aligns the ‘reasonable grounds to believe’ standard with the ‘reasonable suspicion’ benchmark used by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in cases concerning pre-trial detention (for example, Abd Al Rahman, §28). According to the ECtHR, Article 5(1)(c) ECHR requires sufficient elements ‘to satisfy an objective observer that the applicant could have committed the offences of which he was accused’ (§32). In Şık v. Turkey (No. 2), the ECtHR emphasised that ‘it is essential that the facts grounding the suspicion should be justified by verifiable and objective evidence and that they can be reasonably considered as falling under one of the sections describing criminal behaviour in the Criminal Code’ (§§121-122). Notably, regarding the factual aspect of the existence of the ‘reasonable suspicion’, the Court required the government only to demonstrate (which it failed to do) the ‘plausibility’ of the acts described in the charges. In this case, at least, the Court suggested that plausibility may be sufficient to establish a reasonable suspicion.
The ICJ’s determination that there are plausible violations of the Genocide Convention in Gaza could therefore carry weight in the ICC’s assessment whether reasonable grounds exist to believe that a crime within its jurisdiction has occurred. Although mere plausibility of the criminal acts may seem too low a standard to accuse an individual of grave crimes, it is important to recall that proceedings under Article 58 of the Rome Statute represent an initial phase. Only at the trial stage does the Prosecutor need to establish that a crime within the Court’s jurisdiction has occurred.
It beggars belief that people like you exist; saying that what is very clearly an intentional genocide isn't one and that no-one should do anyone about it. Do you have no fucking morals? Were you just brainwashed so horribly on your Birthright?
If this were real life, you wouldn't even dare to say aloud that "why would it even be considered a genocide", because you'd be so ashamed because everyone would look at you like the drooling moron you are.
Educate yourself https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192
-
You genocide defending fucks make me sick to my stomach.
if this is what does you in, you won't have a very good time on this little thing here called the internet, again, you keep saying shit i don't say. Stop putting words in my mouth.
While we're here, let's play a game. one of my personal favorites
“More legally and specifically” as if “ethnicity” isn’t well defined in international law. gtfo noob.
alright then big man, link me to the resources that define these things.
Does the state share cultural and historical background with the rest of the NATION-STATE they belong to? Yes. They do. They share a cultural and historical background.
most of palestine is partially arab, therefore, palestine is arab in ethnicity. There are a few religious minorities, but that's typical, though i'm not familiar with most middle eastern states so i wouldn't know if any of those are illegal elsewhere.
Also if this is such a hard concept for you to grasp, i will simply point you to asian, european, slavic, african, all of these are arguably ethnicities, though broadly defined, as there are usually more specific subsets for these. Palestinian is arguably a subset of these more broadly defined groups (though i left out the middle east)
The reason that the holocaust was considered genocide was because it was literally targeting jews, for no reason other than cleansing them. (also it had a kill count in the millions) If genocide is considered to be killing people of an ethnic group, than would you classify the US bombing of japan during ww2 to be an ethnic cleansing? because as far as i can tell, that would not be what that is considered, even remotely. Even though we literally bombed hundreds of thousands of japanese people over the course of the war. Presumably genocide has to be defined by a percentage of the total population, given a motivation to "cleanse" said population, the boulder shooting for example would that count as a genocide? What about the florida church shooting?
in fact, according to the genocide convention it's an extremely broad definition, including almost nothing specifically, other than the fact that it must be "... any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:" it doesn't specify military operations, and i am almost sure there are exceptions to this clause in the definition of military operations, because this is law we're talking about. In fact, this is also so incredibly broad, that the only way it could reasonably be defined, is in a court of law, specifically an international one, only then would we be able to determine what the answer is here.
So if you lived a hundred years ago, you would say that the Nazis aren’t on “your land” and thus “literally not your problem to answer”?
you forget that this is basically what the US did up until germany threatened attack on the US. The nazis were also operating differently, unlike israel, who is actively engaged in war, germany sort of just, walked up to people, waved, said hello, and then invaded them and overthrew their governments within about a week or two. (highly verbatim, don't take this literally, since you probably know fuck all about ww2 lol)
Nazi germany was also literally a fascist dictatorship, israel is quite literally a democratic country. These are quite literally two incomparable situations.
We live in an global interconnected world and you bet your goddamn stinky arse that it’s also your problem, no matter how indirectly. The war in Ukraine isn’t your land, thus “literally not your problem”, right?
the war in ukraine literally isn't my problem, i have no control over it, i have no authority over anything related to it, the best i can do is vote. That's it. Does it affect me? Yes, so do tornados, and hurricanes, and floods, and fires, are those my problem? No, i literally can't do anything about them. I just have to live with them.
And that’s a very simple example (for what I assume is a very simple person), but people could list literally thousands of ways how this is your problem as well.
yeah and the OPEC founding caused the energy crisis of the 70's. I'm almost certain i could list more ways that the ukraine russia war effects the global economy, i've been around the topic extensively and i am rather familiar with the effects of trade on a globalized economy. My point here is that i did not create OPEC, i literally have no control over what russia decides to do, it doesn't fucking matter what i think.
Do you live under a fucking rock? https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192
did you just link the ongoing court case? I'm not up to speed on it as i don't turbo nerd follow every global political event unfortunately, i have to spend time playing factorio and shit, i'm a person after all. So i'm not sure if this has had a legal conclusion (though i would have almost certainly heard about it) This is literally the equivalent of me suing you for "raping me" that doesn't mean that you raped me, or that i lied, it just means that it has to go through court, it has to be tried, and it has to be ruled on, to some degree. To my knowledge, none of that has happened yet considering what most of those links appear to be are "motions filing for the convention of genocide"
The motherfucking INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT has said there are “reasonable grounds” for a genocide, and their standard of proof is a bit higher than some random asshole online who admits they don’t know anything about anything that’s outside of America.
and i don't disagree? My problem here is that there is no "proven genocide" it's "reasonable grounds for genocide" those are two very different things. And yes, the standard of proof IS higher than my dumbass self saying shit on the internet, you'll notice i have literally NEVER said that this is or isn't a genocide, i've just said that i'm not sure what this would be classified as, because this is a rather unusual proceeding in modern politics.
also here's a little fun fact if you're linking israeli officials that go against netanyahu. Have you ever considered that they may be doing it as an act of political posturing to gain support from opponents of netanyahu? If i were a political figure in israel that was opposed to him, i would absolutely be doing the same thing.
"plausible violations of the Genocide Convention in Gaza"
plausible does not mean confirmed, it just means likely possible. Not that it even happened, but that there's a likely chance that it could've happened Plausible is barely any more sound than 'maybe" or "possible" or "technically a possibility"
saying that what is very clearly an intentional genocide isn’t one and that no-one should do anyone about it.
wow... you are, uh, very bad at reading comprehension, like really bad. Are you chatGPT by chance? Llama model? What flavor of generative AI are we speaking here?
To cover this one statement by statement here:
it is not "very clearly an intentional genocide" it's a war, between an organziation that has literally (according to your standards) committed an act of terrorism against israel "At least forty-four nations have publicly expressed their unequivocal condemnation of Hamas and explicitly decried its tactics as terrorism."
"isn't one" Show me one message where i have explicitly said "israel is not committing genocide against palestine" Across my ENTIRE account history, please, show me one.
"no-one should do anyone about it" this one isn't quite true, it's more a mischaracterization than anything. What i'm saying is that we you and me, have almost nothing that we can do, other than say "hey i don't like this, don't do that shit." but that's about the extent of it, our elected officials can do more, and doing this "genocide denial" shit, doesn't fucking help. Because at the end of the day nobody fucking cares whether it's genocide or not they want the war to stop
Do you have no fucking morals?
i do have morals, they're just rather minimal, and weirdly enough, don't include the very specific designation of "ISRAEL BAD PALESTINE GOOD" anywhere in there, it does have shit like "war crimes bad" "war not good" "crime bad" "don't murder" though.
Were you just brainwashed so horribly on your Birthright?
homie you are the one putting words into my mouth here. Please, if you're going to accuse a degenerate furry of being "brainwashed" at least be clever about it.
If this were real life, you wouldn’t even dare to say aloud that “why would it even be considered a genocide”, because you’d be so ashamed because everyone would look at you like the drooling moron you are.
this literally is real life, and i'm right here, and you're right there, unless you're chatgpt. Why would i be ashamed? This is a very standard practice in the field of philosophy, especially sociology. Clinical analysis of these types of situations is the only thing that provides meaningful results. Also cool adhom, should i call you removed now? Is that how this works? I would rather not though, because that's extremely rude.
Educate yourself https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192
again, i think you need to actually read what it says, because it's pretty explicit about what it says, and what it says is that "it is possible that genocide has been committed in gaza by israel." If it said anything else, there would be an arrest warrant out for netanyahu, most of the upper political government, as well as most military leaders, and perpetrators of the "genocide" weirdly, there seems to be a distinct lack of any of this happening, and i'm not sure why, it's almost as if nobody really knows what the status of what is currently happening is.
-
Like I said, people like you make me sick to my fucking stomach.
alright then big man, link me to the resources that define these things.
So... either you're completely incapable of using Google, or you're arguing in bad faith, because you just don't even want to try and look up the definition. I can't know for certain, perhaps you're just so stupid you literally have never used Google?
https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.41/2014/mtg1/10_E_0718.pdf https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ethnicity-and-international-law/ECF719C31352BA6F65CF54A887B9E384 https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/ethnic-minority-lawyers/a-guide-to-race-and-ethnicity-terminology-and-language
Also if this is such a hard concept for you to grasp, i will simply point you to asian, european, slavic, african, all of these are arguably ethnicities, though broadly defined, as there are usually more specific subsets for these. Palestinian is arguably a subset of these more broadly defined groups (though i left out the middle east)
Your childish word-salad is making me laugh out-loud. You don't even get a "good try". Sorry boy-o.
So you deny the Genocide in Gaza?
No need to equivocate like that, your stance is clear.
You need to read it more clearly. Your grasp of language is horrible. You don't understand the differences between terms like state, ethnicity, nation, nation-state, and refuse to even read about them, the PROUDLY IGNORANT American you are. It's not my fault that you can't even grasp your native language on a level that you'd be able to have this conversation.
You don't understand what it takes for the ICJ and the ICC to admit that there is a case here. They do not admit to genocide lightly, and the trial is still open.
WHO is arguing that there ISN'T a genocide?
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/un-expert-says-israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-calls-arms-embargo-2024-03-26/ https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/11/gaza-un-experts-call-international-community-prevent-genocide-against
https://press.un.org/en/2024/ga12599.doc.htm
A majority of countries have decided that yes, it is indeed a genocide and yes, Israel is criminal scum and only a tiny minority of countries (like the US) deny the genocide.
There are THOUSANDS of experts on international law who don't hesitate a second to call it what it is; GENOCIDE
But you stand on the side of the Nazis. Fucking disgusting.
this literally is real life, and i’m right here, and you’re right there
Alright, come have an actual voice chat and webcam with me which I will record it and post it here. With your own name, of course, as this is real life we're talking about.
But you won't do that, because you're a scared little kid who has been brainwashed and is unable to question said propaganda, which is why you push it despite not really believing in it, which is why you have to argue in bad faith, which is why you pretend Lemmy is "real life"* and which is why you pretend you don't know how to Google and which is why you equivocate two pages of utter gibberish.
So, you would outright deny that there is a genocide in Gaza, is that right?
You'll equivocate a bit more while denying the genocide and avoiding showing your face, just like the sick nazi fucks perpetuating it.
-
Like I said, people like you make me sick to my fucking stomach.
reading the english language makes me nauseous, oh woe is me my head hurts now.
Your childish word-salad is making me laugh out-loud. You don’t even get a “good try”. Sorry boy-o.
damn, the words, what do they mean. A question for the future times i suppose.
So you deny the Genocide in Gaza?
I'm not saying anything in specific with regards to the israel palestine situation other than the fact that "shit's fucked" right now. Could there be a genocide? I suppose so. I would need more definite proof before coming to that determination. You keep pretending like not having a binary answer going one way or the other is literally impossible. It might be if you have the collective reasoning and critical thinking skills of a toddler, unfortunately, i have been blessed with the mental faculties, of a grown adult human. and therefore i have to contend with the realities of the world, because they are simply a thing that exist.
No need to equivocate like that, your stance is clear.
what the fuck do you mean? I have explicitly stated what my stance on this is, multiple times, it's the same everytime, if you think it's any different that's a problem with your comprehension. You have probably gaslit yourself into thinking that i have an opinion on something, that i genuinely do not have an opinion on other than "idk war bad" I would go into it with more depth but clearly that would confuse you, since you seem to lack the capability of interpreting a non binary answer.
You need to read it more clearly. Your grasp of language is horrible. You don’t understand the differences between terms like state, ethnicity, nation, nation-state
perhaps, one could argue that i was making a point about the intricacies in small things making determination of larger concepts a much harder process. Seems like you have that part ironed out, though it seems you're more set on yelling at me and calling me a "genocide defending fuckhead"
You don’t understand what it takes for the ICJ and the ICC to admit that there is a case here. They do not admit to genocide lightly, and the trial is still open.
yeah i don't, and you probably don't either, what i do understand is how the court works. Once there is a set ruled verdict on this case, it will be a settled matter, and i will not have to expend energy on it, as it will be decided in the global court of law as it should be not on the internet, by angry people who may or may not even be real.
WHO is arguing that there ISN’T a genocide?
oh i don't know, let's see here, a significant portion of the media, a good chunk of israel, a good chunk of the israeli population, probably a pretty big segment of the jewish population as well. Idk man, seems like quite a few people here to me.
A majority of countries have decided that yes, it is indeed a genocide and yes, Israel is criminal scum and only a tiny minority of countries (like the US) deny the genocide.
There is no decision here, unless we are talking about the court case, and if we're talking about the court case, then no, there is no decision because it has not run its due course yet. This is the entire point of the case. You don't build a global legal system intending to prevent things like genocide, and then ONLY use it when there is 100% provable, for certain genocide going on. Because then it would, ironically, miss genocide. The whole point of it is to be a check and balance on the various members of the international community hopefully ensuring that something like ww2 never has to happen again.
These countries might publicly report that they believe this, but this is also just that they believe it, and i would presume it's probably "we believe that israel might be perpetrating genocide" rather than the aforementioned 100% affirmative, you seem to continually and regularly use.
There are THOUSANDS of experts on international law who don’t hesitate a second to call it what it is; GENOCIDE
oh cool, so you probably have a document included the signed, consented opinion of thousands of international law experts saying verbatim "i believe that israel has 100% committed genocide" that isn't just going to be a 300 hundred page document about the potentiality that israel has committed genocide? I find it curious that you don't link anything the first time around, seems like you're here to yell at people first and provide sources later, seems rather irresponsible to me.
But you stand on the side of the Nazis. Fucking disgusting.
i literally don't, and you can't prove otherwise, and you haven't proven otherwise. Try harder kiddo.
Alright, come have an actual voice chat and webcam with me which I will record it and post it here. With your own name, of course, as this is real life we’re talking about.
you are literally asking me to doxx myself, very cool. Super cool, perchance can i have your full legal name? Also why would i? Doxx me and come say hi :)
But you won’t do that, because you’re a scared little kid who has been brainwashed and is unable to question said propaganda, which is why you push it despite not really believing in it, which is why you have to argue in bad faith, which is why you pretend Lemmy is "real life"* and which is why you pretend you don’t know how to Google and which is why you equivocate two pages of utter gibberish.
just for the record here, i'm not going to do it because i have nothing i want to say to you. Nor do i care enough about this ordeal to deal with someone on a level like this. But yeah no i guess the "nuance" propaganda has really gotten into my brain and it has really affected me now. It's affected me so deeply that i've completely broken down my entire life view, and rebuilt it from the ground up, just so i could have a view on life that wasn't defined by any existing structure or ideology in particular. I guess that propaganda has really worked it's way in huh? The years of isolation in pursuit of meaning have culminated in the end result of nothing after this long period of time. (i also do not have a webcam, so)
You're sitting here pretending that discord is real life, why are you accosting me for saying that lemmy is real life (ignoring the fact that this is a blatant mischaracterization) lemmy would be considered to be an extension of life, arguably, an extension of the socialization of life specifically. Since most people don't use lemmy much outside of socializing. But that's clearly too much of an abstract concept for you.
also i don't think you understand what the definition of equivocation is, you're the one equivocating my statements lol. Equivocal just means that something is "not clearly defined/stated" an equivocation is using that specific mechanism to work around a certain thing, most commonly a question. If you were to ask me a question, to which i was to respond with something that isn't an answer, that would be an equivocation. I however, am responding with an answer. It's very clear.
Also i like the little extra asterisk after the quoted italics section, very cute, i can see you were rather angry when typing that section out.
So, you would outright deny that there is a genocide in Gaza, is that right?
to rephrase this a little bit, since you're very clearly loading the statements here. Just because i feel a little bit generous.
"so, would you consider what israel is doing in gaza, to be equivalent to a genocide?"
my short answer would be "no, because i do not have a clear understanding of the situation to a point where i can make a reasonably informed decision on the matter."
My long answer, would be: Given the historical contexts of what is currently going on in israel/palestine at the given moment, it is extremely difficult to give a concise answer to the question, adding all of the propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation out there on the internet, from both sides (we know this part from the ukraine, russia war, it's very apparent) that there is almost no reputable source of information regarding any one topic on the matter, as it differs from person to person. Combined with the given definition of genocide being a particular action, and this being a very definite war. It's hard to delineate between where war stops, and genocide ends. When we include middle eastern culture into this it only gets less defined.
In short, i have no reasonable way, manner, or method, to make a well informed opinion of the events taking place, including my understood lack of knowledge on the topic, such that i wouldn't be disseminating some form of misinformation, or disinformation, which is not something i wish to do. Combine that with the general stance i have on providing other people free will, and not trying to influence people in any particular manner, it would not benefit me in any manner either. The best i can do is to coalesce my known information into one place, and collect my thoughts in a manner that allows me to best express my understanding of the situation, in hopes that it gives other people insight into what's going on, on some rudimentary level, while on top of that, instilling in them a healthy dose of nuance.
although i'm sure nothing i could say would satiate your desires for conflict.
avoiding showing your face
oh please, show me your face! I'm sure it's pretty. Or will you not, because you don't stand for your own morals? I will continue to not, because my morals are simply different from yours, and that's ok. That makes me no less of a person than you, just anonymous. As i prefer to be on the internet, presumably, like you currently are, and will continue to be, because you have no interest in revealing your identity to me as it could bring unforeseen consequences. Which, is fine. Though hypocritical given your previous statements. Perhaps you could even do some equivocation of your own there?
-
And how exactly did you get "I hate reading" from "I hate genocidal fucks like you"?
No need to equivocate like that, your stance is clear.
What the fuck do you mean? I have explicitly stated what my stance on this is, multiple times, it’s the same everytime, if you think it’s any different that’s a problem with your comprehension.
Weirdly you keep avoiding actually mentioning any, just going on with vague "both sides" bullshit and "not enough evidence" patheticism.
Since it clearly missed you; DO YOU THINK THERE'S A GENOCIDE GOING ON IN GAZA?
Do you think Israelis are at an equal risk of being the victims of genocide as Palestinians are?
ANSWER CLEARLY; since I'm clearly incapable of perceiving anything other. (Or you just equivocate because you know what is the right side of history but you don't actually want to go against your brainwashing of DO NOT CRITICISE ISRAEL DO NOT CRITICISE ISRAEL.)
perhaps, one could argue that i was making a point about the intricacies in small things making determination of larger concepts a much harder process
You didn't read it, got it. You skimmed and concluded "there's no sentence" and thought that's it. That's exactly my point about the way you "argue."
just for the record here, i’m not going to do it
Yes, I knew you wouldn't, because you don't have the spine to stand behind this garbage with your own name, face or even voice. Probably because it's high and crackling. You can't put your money where your mouth is, because you don't believe or even understand what you're pushing.
it is extremely difficult to give a concise answer to the question, adding all of the propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation out there on the internet, from both sides
No, it isn't, unless you're pushing Israeli propaganda.
Again. Literally the vast fucking majority of the world agree it's a genocide.
Algeria[179] Bangladesh[4] Bolivia[180] Brazil[181][182][183] Chile[184] China[185] Colombia[181][186] Comoros[187] Cuba[188] Djibouti[187] Egypt[189][190] Indonesia[191] Iran[192] Iraq[191] Ireland[193] Jordan[194] Lebanon[195] Libya[196] Malaysia[197] Maldives[198] Mexico[199] Namibia[4] Nicaragua[4][200] Pakistan[201] Palestine[4] Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic[202] Saint Vincent and the Grenadines[203] Slovenia[204][205] Spain[206][207] Syria[208] Turkey[197] Venezuela[4] Zimbabwe[209][210] African Union[211][212] Arab League[213] Organisation of Islamic Cooperation[214] Non-Aligned Movement
Some more alliances, less stately:
undefined
Al-Haq[277] Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights[277] Amnesty International[278] Boycott from Within[274][276][279] CodePink[280][272][273] De-Colonizer[281][274][276] Democratic Socialists of America[274] Human Rights Watch[27][282][4] International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network[274] International Peoples' Assembly[131] Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions[274][276][283] Israelis Against Apartheid[274][276][284][285] Jewish Voice for Peace[274] La Via Campesina[131] National Lawyers Guild[272] Nelson Mandela Foundation[286] New Zealand Labour Party[287][288] Palestinian Centre for Human Rights[277] Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions[131] Palestinian NGO Network[131] Progressive International[280][272][273] RootsAction[280][272][273] People's Forum[280][272][273] Women's International League for Peace and Freedom[289] World Beyond War[280][272][273] World March of Women[131]These are just the ones officially supporting South-Africa's ICC case. Not every country which condemns Israel.
https://press.un.org/en/2024/ga12599.doc.htm
At Emergency Special Session, General Assembly Overwhelmingly Backs Membership of Palestine to United Nations, Urges Security Council Support Bid
The Assembly adopted the resolution titled “Admission of new Members to the United Nations” (document A/ES-10/L.30/Rev.1) by a recorded vote of 143 in favour to 9 against (Argentina, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, United States)
You know why a majority is for giving Palestine official UN status and Israel and other pussy-states are against it? Because as soon as it goes through, it's much simpler to show that the legal definition of a genocide (which you tried looking up on fucking wikipedia :DDD, here have an actual document lol.
Here's the Israeli Defence Minister directly announcing that they are fighting "HUMAN ANIMALS". (Perhaps google the word "dehumanisation".) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbPdR3E4hCk (edit forgot to add this link)
In short, i have no reasonable way, manner, or method, to make a well informed opinion of the events taking place
Yeah, because you're **PURPOSEFULLY IGNORING ALL THE INTERNATIONAL LAW EXPERTS AND GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS LOUDLY CRYING GENOCIDE, GENOCIDE GENOCIDE." You're like a Flat Earther insisting he's using objective science. You're like a scientologists, denouncing psychiatry. You're like a transphobe screaming "there are only two genders." ALL the fucking experts disagree with you, but you're not man enough to admit when you're wrong, or even man enough to understand you should stop shaming yourself online.
"NO WAY OF KNOWING :///////""
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9950n003yo
https://turkiye.un.org/en/263401-gaza-number-children-killed-higher-four-years-world-conflict
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/10/un-expert-warns-new-instance-mass-ethnic-cleansing-palestinians-calls (and that's from last october)
Ah, there's nothing I can do to fix a sick puppy like you, so I don't know why I'm wasting my time on a propaganda-troll. You will never admit Israel is raping and pillaging Palestinians, and it's disgusting and it should make you really, really fucking concerned about your own psyche that you have this sickly desire to acquiesce to shit you know isn't real.
But I guess those UN offices are just "anti-semites looking to genocide Israel", huh?
For the record, I love reading. It's just that you're not producing text. You're producing gibberish you think is convincing rhetoric. It's sort of like watching a five-year old play kitchen. You have absolutely no idea of the words you use and your rhetoric is elementary.
You ignore the evidence , then you equivocate and move the goalposts.
You ignore the fact that ICJ and ICC courts take a significant amount of time. If you were right now being held for trial for allegedly having raped 800 children and there were hundreds of hours of filmed evidence of you doing it, do you think it'd mean you're innocent because you've not yet got a guilty verdict?
You're despicable. And it shows from you getting so utterly pissed when I sussed out so easily that you're probably part of this group and of Jewish American descent, went to your birthright (because you couldn't afford a holiday anytime else) and got brainwashed so bad that now you're getting literally cross-brained trying to not to admit what the scum of Israel are doing.
Why do you ignore all the evidence?
I read all your childish garbage utterings. None of them have a lick of an argument behind them. It's like piss-poor rhetoric from a malnourished Soviet official who started vodka on an empty stomach; zero literacy and stumbling all over in a panic because they know they're in trouble.
-
And how exactly did you get “I hate reading” from “I hate genocidal fucks like you”?
i'm mocking you for saying the same thing repeatedly, it's fucking cringe bro. We get it, you cannot stomach the thought that sometimes people disagree with you.
Weirdly you keep avoiding actually mentioning any, just going on with vague “both sides” bullshit and “not enough evidence” patheticism.
ironically, i do answer it, you just keep ignoring it, for some reason, i've given a very clear answer.
Do you think Israelis are at an equal risk of being the victims of genocide as Palestinians are?
oh good, a good question, i actually really like this question.
To answer your question, if we're talking from a military power standpoint, israelis have a significantly less risk of "being genocided" as opposed to "palestinians" though this is within the context of this war specifically. The reason why is because israel is a massive military state, (they own f35s btw, they're basically a US proxy with how much military power they have) Palestine on the other hand, gets weapon shipments from iran, as per usual. I believe there are also a few other imports they have, but they're the usual primary suspects, from my understanding though it's primarily iran using it as an excuse to proxy war.
Looking at a state size and population metric, it's hard to argue against the claim as well, there are simply more people in israel.
If we're arguing outside the context of the war, from the perspective of the middle east? I don't know, depends on how well relations between israel, and the rest of the middle east are i suppose. Palestine would be basically the rest of the middle east, aside from the fact that it borders israel (again, we're ignoring everything else, this is a purely geographic/demographic based analysis)
Wow! Look at that, when you ask good questions, it's almost like it's possible to receive good answers!
ANSWER CLEARLY; since I’m clearly incapable of perceiving anything other. (Or you just equivocate because you know what is the right side of history but you don’t actually want to go against your brainwashing of DO NOT CRITICISE ISRAEL DO NOT CRITICISE ISRAEL.)
since you seem to think i cannot criticize israel at all, it is clearly impossible for me to do so. Even though i have said NOTHING about israel, i will now go on to criticize israel and their wartime efforts.
Let's see, notably in the public eye, the civilian causalities have been rather high. But then again, russia has also lost 300,000 troops in combat, granted not civilian, they're mostly conscripts and draft picks. (a significant portion of which have been ethnic minorities living in russia, so if we're talking about genocide, arguably russia has been technically been doing a genocide, just very quietly) Perhaps that should make you sick to your stomach as well. Ukraine has also suffered losses, but they have also evacuated millions of people, to my knowledge. So most of which would've been people who didn't evacuate (likely by choice) or soldiers.
The public eye is rather boring though, so let's go a little bit deeper, israels control over gaza over the last period of however long it's been going on for is rather concerning. There's very little freedom living in gaza, but then again, hamas did decide to war against israel, so how much of that is really "israel bad" and how much of that is "hamas bad" is a question left up to interpretation i suppose. These kinds of thing when in war are so inconsequential it's not even worth considering though.
Israel absolutely has all kinds of propaganda, i'm not versed on what is confirmed propaganda, but i've heard a lot of stuff is, and a lot of stuff isn't though i'm almost certain that some of it is.
Public PR wise, netanyahu is terrible. Unless you're jewish probably. He seems like a goofy guy, seems to be stuck in an awkward spot where most of his government isn't supporting him, except for the far right, so he seems to be leaning on them in order to stay in power. The public in israel doesn't seem to be happy with what he's doing.
Long term, israel doesn't seem to have a plan, they seem to either war constantly, or not. They don't seem to have any sort of long term solution at all. Which is obviously, not helpful at all. They really seem content to just, keep warring. When they do stop warring, they seem to cause problems. Often times shit happens that really shouldn't (arguably hamas is one)
You didn’t read it, got it. You skimmed and concluded “there’s no sentence” and thought that’s it. That’s exactly my point about the way you “argue.”
nah i just don't remember what i typed because it's been like three fucking days and i'm not scrolling up to make a coherent point about some shit i'm clearly philosophically babbling about.
No, it isn’t, unless you’re pushing Israeli propaganda.
yes it is? It's literally war? Go find ANY open source intelligence community working on military stuff, anywhere, and please tell me how confident they are in what they find, and what they predict. You'll find that they aren't confident at all, and in fact just propose ideas. It's really quite boring, but i find it rather interesting.
Again. Literally the vast fucking majority of the world agree it’s a genocide.
again, i think this is a slight mischaracterization. This is a list of countries around the world who support south africas legal inquiry to whether or not this is considered to be genocide. Meaning that they would like for a just answer to the question at hand.
"The president expressed his support for South Africa's initiative to call on the International Court of Justice to order Israel to immediately cease all acts and measures that may constitute genocide"
Hey look at that! it's a quote directly from the segment you quote from on wikipedia! It says EXACTLY what i said it would probably say, isn't that weird? It's almost like i know some things.
it’s much simpler to show that the legal definition of a genocide (which you tried looking up on fucking wikipedia :DDD
woah, look at that, an actual legal definition, you could've just linked that in the first post, or comment, i don't remember how this thread started anymore and we wouldn't be here!
Regardless i still have some issue with the definition as stated, because it has no (at least none that i can find) stipulations for anything regarding an actual war, because it turns out, most wars would arguably be defined as genocide under that definition. The USSR against Afhgan war? Genocide. WW1? Genocide. Numerous genocides infact! Japanese sino war? Also probably genocide! Japanese russo war? Also probably genocide! The mexican american war? Also, still probably genocide.
anyway, enough contextual meandering, that's not the point, i'm just making a point here.
Yeah, because you’re **PURPOSEFULLY IGNORING ALL THE INTERNATIONAL LAW EXPERTS AND GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS LOUDLY CRYING GENOCIDE, GENOCIDE GENOCIDE."
little fun fact for you, human rights orgs are primarily opposed to this, because it's a fucking war. Nobody likes war. Also just because someone is an expert doesn't mean you should listen to them, and or fully believe them. here's a little tidbit of information for you. Most of these experts particularly the law experts, are probably rather infamiliar with local cultural customs and differences between the east and the west, which is almost certainly an influencing factor for this war. A lot of them are likely getting lots of air time. (which also means money) and the media loves money! We know this.
Also, they're loudly crying genocide. Nobody wants to fucking listen to anybody doing that. It's literally the boy who cried wolf. If it's actually a genocide, the currently ongoing court case slated to determine this question, will fucking tell us. As for now, how do we talk about this? Simple, don't call it a genocide, because we don't fucking know. You wanna talk about war crimes? That's great, i'll listen, there's something actually tangible there. You wanna talk about human rights? That's another big thing, that's a tangible thing.
Stating that this is genocide is like me stating that the world is going to end october 22 2042. It doesn't matter to you whether i'm factually right about it, maybe i'm fucking god for all you know. There's nothing of tangible substance there. You can't do anything with that. Therefore, you don't care.
Here’s the Israeli Defence Minister directly announcing that they are fighting “HUMAN ANIMALS”. (Perhaps google the word “dehumanisation”.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbPdR3E4hCk (edit forgot to add this link)
hey look, a good argument against israel, sure is weird how when you bring up tangible things, stuff starts to become a lot more reasonable doesn't it?
You’re like a Flat Earther insisting he’s using objective science. You’re like a scientologists, denouncing psychiatry. You’re like a transphobe screaming “there are only two genders.” ALL the fucking experts disagree with you, but you’re not man enough to admit when you’re wrong, or even man enough to understand you should stop shaming yourself online.
i could say the exact same thing to you, and it would be equally as valid. This is a bad argument. I won't entertain it.
“NO WAY OF KNOWING :///////”"
you link things that do not claim there is an active genocide (in the headline at least) and the one that does, is lying.
Ah, there’s nothing I can do to fix a sick puppy like you
i appreciate that you picked up the furry lore. :)
You will never admit Israel is raping and pillaging Palestinians
they might be, idk, russia might have been doing the same thing in ukraine, wars fucked bro. You see that video from wagner of the POW being sledehammered?
oops, character limit, comment in reply to this one coming up soon!
-
it's literally war?
Again, your lack of education on the subject is quite entertaining. No, it isn't war. Is the nation of Palestine at war with the nation of Israel? No. Israel claims to be at war with a vaguely defined terrorist organisation. There's quite a lot of literature about the war on "terror" and how it enables authoritarian military action. Of course you haven't read any of that.
War has a definition.
War is a phenomenon of organized collective violence that affects either the relations between two or more societies or the power relations within a society. War is governed by the law of armed conflict, also called “international humanitarian law.”
https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/article/3/war/
Hmm... and what does that "international humanitarian law" say about this conflict? Should we ask the experts, perhaps? Unless you think you're so much more knowledgeable in international law than literally every single expert on international law?
Since you seem to be partial to Wikipedia (probably because of it's simplicity): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes
But also, from an actual source:
The Prosecutor seeks arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yoav Gallant, the Israeli Minister of Defense, on the basis that they committed the war crime of ‘intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare’ under article 8(2)(b)(xxv) of the ICC Statute. The Prosecutor also seeks to charge the two suspects with various other war crimes and crimes against humanity associated with the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare under articles 7 and 8 of the ICC Statute. These include the war crimes of ‘[w]ilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health’ or cruel treatment, wilful killing or murder, and intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population. The proposed charges also include the crimes against humanity of murder, extermination, other inhumane acts and persecution with respect to deaths and injuries resulting from or associated with the systematic deprivation of objects indispensable to the survival of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. The Panel notes the Prosecutor’s statement that other alleged crimes, including in connection with the large-scale bombing campaign in Gaza, are actively being investigated.
Report of the Panel of Experts in International Law
nah i just don’t remember what i typed
"No my gf lives in Canada you wouldn't know her, but she's definitely real"
"The information you gave from the United Nations, the UN Human Right Office, they mean absolutely nothing, or they straight up lie."
And you say you could equally well say to me that my facts don't make sense? Mmm-hhmm, yeah. I keep showing actual sources from the United Nations and other reputable institutions and experts on international law. You keep having a tantrum and kicking your feet, screaming "fake news fake news." You might delude yourself into thinking we're both on the same footing in the debate, but you are the only one who's even slightly buying that.
Keep sealioning, kiddo, it's not gonna make your delusions real. You still refuse to answer very simple yes or no questions: is Israel committing warcrimes? Is there a genocide being committed? You pretend to answer, but you only equivocate. And your equivocation isn't even on the level of Trump, and that man is demented as fuck.
-
Again, your lack of education on the subject is quite entertaining. No, it isn’t war. Is the nation of Palestine at war with the nation of Israel? No. Israel claims to be at war with a vaguely defined terrorist organisation. There’s quite a lot of literature about the war on “terror” and how it enables authoritarian military action. Of course you haven’t read any of that.
ah curious, let's see. For full transparency, since i'm better at quoting from you, here is an excerpt from the original 1988 hamas charter
"Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement. Abusing any part of Palestine is abuse directed against part of religion. Nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its religion. Its members have been fed on that. For the sake of hoisting the banner of Allah over their homeland they fight. "Allah will be prominent, but most people do not know."
Now and then the call goes out for the convening of an international conference to look for ways of solving the (Palestinian) question. Some accept, others reject the idea, for this or other reason, with one stipulation or more for consent to convening the conference and participating in it. Knowing the parties constituting the conference, their past and present attitudes towards Moslem problems, the Islamic Resistance Movement does not consider these conferences capable of realising the demands, restoring the rights or doing justice to the oppressed. These conferences are only ways of setting the infidels in the land of the Moslems as arbitraters. When did the infidels do justice to the believers?
undefined
"But the Jews will not be pleased with thee, neither the Christians, until thou follow their religion; say, The direction of Allah is the true direction. And verily if thou follow their desires, after the knowledge which hath been given thee, thou shalt find no patron or protector against Allah." (The Cow - verse 120).
There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors. The Palestinian people know better than to consent to having their future, rights and fate toyed with. As in said in the honourable Hadith:
undefined
"The people of Syria are Allah's lash in His land. He wreaks His vengeance through them against whomsoever He wishes among His slaves It is unthinkable that those who are double-faced among them should prosper over the faithful. They will certainly die out of grief and desperation."" https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hamas.asp and your ever so coveted link of course.
But i'm sure you'll just say "well um akshually, this is old. So let's have a look at the "new charter" as referred to by hamas themselves.
link of course: https://israeled.org/resources/documents/hamas-a-document-of-general-principles-policies/ (ah but of course, this is an israeli source, how could i trust it? Well, jstor has a copy, but it's fucking paywalled and im not paying for that shit)
"Palestine is the land of the Arab Palestinian people, from it they originate, to it they adhere and belong, and about it they reach out and communicate."
just a little tidbit on palestine being arab, get fucked even hamas says so.
"Palestine is the cause of a people who have been let down by a world that fails to secure their rights and restore to them what has been usurped from them, a people whose land continues to suffer one of the worst types of occupation in this world.
Palestine is a land that was seized by a racist, anti-human and colonial Zionist project that was founded on a false promise (the Balfour Declaration), no recognition of a usurping entity and on imposing a fait accompli by force.
Palestine symbolizes the resistance that shall continue until liberation is accomplished, until the return is fulfilled and until a fully sovereign state is established with Jerusalem as its capital."
oh boy this sounds familiar.
" Palestine, which extends from the River Jordan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west and from Ras Al-Naqurah in the north to Umm Al-Rashrash in the south, is an integral territorial unit. It is the land and the home of the Palestinian people. The expulsion and banishment of the Palestinian people from their land and the establishment of the Zionist entity therein do not annul the right of the Palestinian people to their entire land and do not entrench any rights therein for the usurping Zionist entity. Palestine is an Arab Islamic land. It is a blessed sacred land that has a special place in the heart of every Arab and every Muslim."
hmmm.
"The Palestinian people are one people, made up of all Palestinians, inside and outside of Palestine, irrespective of their religion, culture or political affiliation."
Don't mind them casually dismissing your conception of ethnicity in this case.
"Hamas also believes that Palestine has always been and will always be a model of coexistence, tolerance and civilizational innovation."
they do also throw this one in there, to be fair.
Oh ADHD though time, did i mention the israeli settlements in westbank/gaza (however that works) because if not, why the fuck are they there? Yet another anti-israeli point for you to wrap your head around.
"The following are considered null and void: the Balfour Declaration, the British Mandate Document, the UN Palestine Partition Resolution, and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them. The establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and goes against their will and the will of the Ummah; it is also in violation of human rights that are guaranteed by international conventions, foremost among them is the right to self-determination."
wonder how they're going to go about the dissolution of israel...
"Resisting the occupation with all means and methods is a legitimate right guaranteed by divine laws and by international norms and laws. At the heart of these lies armed resistance, which is regarded as the strategic choice for protecting the principles and the rights of the Palestinian people."
"how is this war?"
yeah idk man, they literally state by all means. I would presume war is included in that.
"Hamas rejects any attempt to undermine the resistance and its arms. It also affirms the right of our people to develop the means and mechanisms of resistance. Managing resistance, in terms of escalation or de-escalation, or in terms of diversifying the means and methods, is an integral part of the process of managing the conflict and should not be at the expense of the principle of resistance."
oops more war speak.
"From a legal and humanitarian perspective, the liberation of Palestine is a legitimate activity, it is an act of self-defence, and it is the expression of the natural right of all peoples to self-determination."
ah curious, self defense, surely this could not be construed to mean war could it?
accidentally posted, oopsiess, anyway.
Unless you think you’re so much more knowledgeable in international law than literally every single expert on international law?
man you really keep reaching, please show me somewhere i've explicitly stated that.
Since you seem to be partial to Wikipedia (probably because of it’s simplicity):
there's a few reasons, it's generally pretty accurate on the general public opinion of conflicts, and often has lots of high density information on the given topic, and unlike most of the internet, isn't a complete clusterfuck that is hell to navigate.
It's also generally universally accepted to be "moderately reliable" which is highly useful.
and since we're linking wikipedia as a source here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict
oh look at that, it lists it as a conflict, which is basically one step under a war.
“No my gf lives in Canada you wouldn’t know her, but she’s definitely real”
my brother in christ, scroll up you lazy motherfucker and see what i wrote, i haven't edited that shit because i'm not a removed ass motherfucker. And then yell at me on my contradictions or whatever the fuck you want to yell at me about. You love reading don't you? I thought you enjoyed this?
And you say you could equally well say to me that my facts don’t make sense? Mmm-hhmm, yeah. I keep showing actual sources from the United Nations and other reputable institutions and experts on international law.
cool story but like, it's irrelevant, try posting something actually relevant next time and maybe it'll matter lmao.
“fake news fake news.”
i have not but ok.
You might delude yourself into thinking we’re both on the same footing in the debate, but you are the only one who’s even slightly buying that.
and curiously, you keep yelling at me. It's almost as if you are not actually any better than me (because otherwise you would speaking with world leaders about this or something) or perhaps a scholar on the topic and busy studying, or you would just post an actually informative comment and leave it at that, because nothing more need be said, but nope, 12 comment chain instead.
You still refuse to answer very simple yes or no questions: is Israel committing warcrimes?
Oh look, another question you haven't asked yet which btw, yes israel is comitting war crimes, and so has hamas. It's almost like answering actual questions is, rather easy.
Is there a genocide being committed?
again, i don't know, and seeing as there is currently a court case on it, i will wait for that verdict. My opinion simply is not as valuable as the world of legal scholars and experts, but curiously, you seem to think your opinion is somehow more objectively right than those, even though they haven't yet deliberated on it.
You pretend to answer
respond to my actual answers pussy.
-
-
continuation of last comment :)
For the record, I love reading. It’s just that you’re not producing text. You’re producing gibberish you think is convincing rhetoric. It’s sort of like watching a five-year old play kitchen. You have absolutely no idea of the words you use and your rhetoric is elementary.
i enjoy reading also, it's often just technical material or something sociological in nature. I should say the same thing about you, you've done nothing but reiterate the same points for the first five or however many comments you made, i simply responded in kind, you'll notice i responded to actually engaging questions in this one!
my brother in christ you do nothing more than post links to shit other people have said and reiterate what they say while being mad, you are literally the equivalent of a piece of silicon processing USB signals.
You ignore the evidence
brother, the evidence you are posting is people going "yeah we think this might be genocide, and we would like for it not happen please" Like i'm sorry but if this were documentation about a nuclear reactor i'd be reading a hand manual for a fucking blender right now.
You ignore the fact that ICJ and ICC courts take a significant amount of time.
yeah, it's a court, of course they do, why do you think i'm waiting until the finalize their statement on this situation? Lmao.
If you were right now being held for trial for allegedly having raped 800 children and there were hundreds of hours of filmed evidence of you doing it, do you think it’d mean you’re innocent because you’ve not yet got a guilty verdict?
hmm let's see, and if i were david mcbride, rotting in australia prison right now, for "committing warcrimes" when i merely exposed actual war crimes, and how they were covered up, by charging people who DIDN'T COMMIT THOSE WARCRIMES. How would i feel about the situation? Idk probably devasted, but like, i think this is probably the least of our concerns. Julian assange was only recently freed, and he didn't even do shit.
Also, legally speaking, it's undecided until the verdict, unless pleas deal technically, but the same standard applies so whatever.
The phrase "innocent until proven guilty" is more about how we should treat people going through the court, you know, salem witch trial type shit.
You’re despicable. And it shows from you getting so utterly pissed when I sussed out so easily that you’re probably part of this group and of Jewish American descent, went to your birthright (because you couldn’t afford a holiday anytime else) and got brainwashed so bad that now you’re getting literally cross-brained trying to not to admit what the scum of Israel are doing.
damn, you really hung yourself out to dry on this one huh. Unfortunately i just so happened to respond with actual responses this time. RIP.
Why do you ignore all the evidence?
the shit you're posting is bad homie. It's not good evidence. It's the metaphorical equivalent of me scrawling on a napkin that there is 12 million dollars in cash in a forest somewhere in ohio, at these coordinates, and then handing it to you.
I read all your childish garbage utterings. None of them have a lick of an argument behind them. It’s like piss-poor rhetoric from a malnourished Soviet official who started vodka on an empty stomach; zero literacy and stumbling all over in a panic because they know they’re in trouble.
this ones clever, i like this one.
-
"Fake news fake news, everything is an opinion, facts don't exist! Israel is just defending itself! Genocide doesn't exist! Palestinians are animals, you can't genocide animals!"
How did you enjoy your birthright year?
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/damning-evidence-of-war-crimes-as-israeli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
Genocide hasn't been determined, as again, ICC procedures take time. Why are you ignoring this? Why are you claiming there is no evidence, when there is enough evidence for the ICC to find "reasonable grounds" for prosecuting and seeks arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant? https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/240520-panel-report-eng.pdf
- The Prosecutor seeks arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yoav Gallant, the Israeli Minister of Defense, on the basis that they committed the war crime of ‘intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare’ under article 8(2)(b)(xxv) of the ICC Statute. The Prosecutor also seeks to charge the two suspects with various other war crimes and crimes against humanity associated with the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare under articles 7 and 8 of the ICC Statute. These include the war crimes of ‘[w]ilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health’ or cruel treatment, wilful killing or murder, and intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population. The proposed charges also include the crimes against humanity of murder, extermination, other inhumane acts and persecution with respect to deaths and injuries resulting from or associated with the systematic deprivation of objects indispensable to the survival of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. The Panel notes the Prosecutor’s statement that other alleged crimes, including in connection with the large-scale bombing campaign in Gaza, are actively being investigated.
- The Prosecutor seeks to charge Netanyahu and Gallant on the basis that they made an essential contribution to a common plan to use starvation and other acts of violence against the Gazan civilian population as a means to eliminate Hamas and secure the return of hostages as well as to inflict collective punishment on the civilian population of Gaza who they perceived as a threat to Israel. It is also alleged that they had effective authority and control over their subordinates and knew of their subordinates’ crimes but did not take necessary action to prevent or repress these crimes, leading to their criminal responsibility as superiors.
- The war crime of ‘intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare’ requires ‘depriving [civilians] of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions’. The crime is not limited solely to the deprivation of food, but includes other objects indispensable for the survival of civilians such as water, fuel and medicine.
- The Panel notes three preliminary points relevant to its analysis. First, as a result of a number of factors, including the imposition by Israel of restrictions on the movement of people and goods from and to Gaza in the aftermath of its 2005 disengagement, Gazans were highly dependent on Israel for the provision of and access to objects indispensable for the survival of the population even before 7 October.7
- Second, although Israeli officials have a right to ensure that aid is not diverted to the benefit of the enemy and to stipulate lawful technical arrangements for its transfer, they cannot impose arbitrary restrictions -- such as restrictions that violate Israel’s obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and 7 international human rights law, or that contravene the principles of necessity and proportionality -- when exercising these rights.
- Third, parties to an armed conflict must not deliberately impede the delivery of humanitarian relief for civilians, including humanitarian relief provided by third parties. And when a territory is under the belligerent occupation of one party to the conflict, there is also an enhanced active obligation for the occupying power to ensure adequate humanitarian aid for civilians, including by providing such aid itself insofar as this is necessary.8 In the Panel’s view, while it can reasonably be argued that Israel was the occupying power in Gaza even before 7 October 2023, Israel certainly became the occupying power in all of or at least in substantial parts of Gaza after its ground operations in the territory began.9
- With this in mind, and based on a review of material presented by the Prosecutor, the Panel assesses that there are reasonable grounds to believe that Netanyahu and Gallant formed a common plan, together with others, to jointly perpetrate the crime of using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. The Panel has concluded that the acts through which this war crime was committed include a siege on the Gaza Strip and the closure of border crossings; arbitrary restrictions on entry and distribution of essential supplies; cutting off supplies of electricity and water, and severely restricting food, medicine and fuel supplies. This deprivation of objects indispensable to civilians’ survival took place in the context of attacks on facilities that produce food and clean water, attacks against civilians attempting to obtain relief supplies and attacks directed against humanitarian workers and convoys delivering relief supplies, despite the deconfliction and coordination by humanitarian agencies with Israel Defence Forces. These acts took place with full knowledge of the extent of Gazans’ reliance on Israel for essential supplies, and the adverse and inevitable consequences of such acts in terms of human suffering and deaths for the civilian population.
- The Prosecutor has also sought charges against Netanyahu and Gallant for the war crimes of wilful killing or murder and intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population, as well as the crimes against humanity of extermination or murder and persecution for deaths resulting from the use of starvation and related acts of violence including attacks on civilians gathering to obtain food and on humanitarian workers.
- In the Panel’s view, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspects committed these crimes. The Panel also considers that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the crimes were committed in the context of a widespread and systematic attack against the civilian population of Gaza, pursuant to State policy.
- The Panel’s assessment is that there are reasonable grounds to believe that Netanyahu and Gallant are responsible for the killing of civilians who died as a result of starvation, either because the suspects meant these deaths to happen or because they were aware that deaths would occur in the ordinary course of events as a result of their methods of warfare. According to material submitted by the Prosecutor, a large number of Palestinian civilians have already died in these circumstances. In relation to extermination, the number of deaths resulting from starvation is sufficient on its own to support the charge, according to standards set out in international jurisprudence.10 And this number is, unfortunately, only likely to rise. There are also reasonable grounds to believe that the starvation campaign and associated acts of violence involved the severe deprivation of victims’ fundamental rights by reason of their identity as Palestinians. This can be qualified as the crime against humanity of persecution.
- The Prosecutor has also sought to charge Netanyahu and Gallant with the crime against humanity of other inhumane acts and the war crime of wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health, or cruel treatment, with respect to the non-lethal suffering inflicted through starvation of the civilian population of Gaza. The Panel assesses that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspects committed these crimes against many thousands of individuals in Gaza.
- Based on the material it has reviewed, the Panel assesses that there are reasonable grounds to believe that Netanyahu and Gallant made essential contributions to the common plan to use starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and commit other acts of violence against the civilian population. This is evidenced by their own statements and the statements of other Israeli officials. It is also evidenced by the systematic nature of the crime, and the involvement of the suspects at the apex of the Israeli governmental apparatus, with effective authority and control over their subordinates and leadership positions in the War Cabinet and Security Cabinet, in which all key decisions on the conduct of the war -- including blocking and limiting humanitarian aid -- have been made. The Panel is also of the view that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspects can be held responsible as superiors given their knowledge of the crimes and the fact that they took no steps to prevent or repress their subordinates who committed them.
But no, there's "no evidence", right? You're not just being a willfully ignorant brainwashed git who's ignoring all the literal evidence and having a tantrum, right? But you won't even read those chapters, and even if you did, your programming won't allow you to accept them. It's despicable. Get a fucking grip on your own head.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
253 comments