Trump Demands Biden Remove Ad of Him Insulting Dead Troops

Autocorrect..fixed..ty

Just run clips of him saying it, then clips of what he just said.

Hell, I've even got an idea for the third commercial:

https://youtu.be/Ag4P2xfmuZQ?si=UkSYTIDp0tE_GnuL&t=66

He's not. He's just an asshole. He can read social cues, he just doesn't care. That's why it can be tiring to deal with people with autism. They're not assholes, but they act similarly.

The convicted felon more likely has some kind of Narcissism.

Antisocial personality disorder is its own thing. It's not related to autism.

World War II was not which is the cemetary which sponsored these quotes.

Where are you getting 93%?

I think that's a question of perspective. We, judging from hindisght and with access to more Information, can tell that. But the people signing up out of a misguided desire to serve probably didn't. Their motivation - regardless of result - was probably to do the right thing, which is a sentiment that Trump evidently doesn't just not understand, but doesn't even seem aware of. "What's in it for them?" betrays a fundamental ignorance of even the concept that his ilk leverage to get people fighting their wars.

I think I'd like to see the numbers to back up your statements about the war in question, WW2. Or, sit back in your armchair because it's still Monday morning somewhere.

You are cherry-picking and going off rails.

But to humor you, how far back do you want to go?

Because the U.S. was founded on atrocities committed against the people who already lived in North America.

And the U.S. funded operations to topple legitimate governments in Central America, a time in which a lot of good people died because of it.

So, don't paint the U.S. as "the good guys who should listen to Trump."

But again, this is entirely a red-herring.

The truth of the matter is, Trump is a piece of shit who doesn't respect the people who sacrifice their lives for his safety.

What kind of fucking weakass reasoning is this? “Genocidal maniacs are the moral equivalent of those who would give their lives to stop them”. The fuck?

This take just baffles me.. you can disapprove of a war, and still respect people willing to put their life on the line for something they believe is right. Even in war, opposing sides have a long history of showing their enemy a certain amount of personal respect, even though they clearly disagree about something to the point of killing each other over it.

Your take is just condescending and unempathetic. You can respect someone for sacrificing themselves without agreeing with them about what they're sacrificing themselves for. Regardless, it shouldn't be hard to see how someone fighting to depose an infamously brutal dictator (Iraq) or a fundamentalist regime that stones women for wanting a divorce (Afghanistan) can believe that they are doing something good.

The Taliban took over Afghanistan as soon as the Americans left.

Did you know why that happened? Because the Afghan military did nothing. They didn't fight. They retreated.

Imagine if a foreign force invaded the U.S. and the army did nothing and the foreign forces took over the government and controlled your life. Do tell, would you feel safe in those circumstances? Do you know why that doesn't happen? Because of the people you and your piece of shit dear leader are disparaging.

So, fuck you.

And fuck off, troll.

Trump doesn't understand the question because he doesn't understand doing things for the betterment of anyone but himself.

For most of history, you didn't ask "what's in it for me" when the king/prime minister/ The Church/ or President came asking (country irrelevant). That's a relatively new luxury due to perspective of the digital age and disagreements with (the US) Government due to transparency.

For most of history "what's in it for you" was actually getting fed and clothed better than the average peasant. Serving the king was what was in it because you didn't have to sleep in pig shit and milk the cows every morning. You'd actually get fed for mealtimes instead of playing the barter game all summer and fall just to have enough food to store in salt barrels for winter. And even better, if you tickled enough enemy hearts with your pointy stick there WAS some land and money for you, provided you survived.

Some countries through history also revere their veterans (with actual respect and benefits) so military service itself was the honor. While I understand it's a dramatization -the beginning of Disney's Mulan is a great display of it. Her father is it is '60s or '70s and has already served once and has a bad leg. The emperor sends out a call for war and the guards show up in town. When they call his name he sets aside his cane and picks up the summons because that's what you did. It is what was expected of him and he did it without complaint.

Why am I unsurprised that the red fascist finds "Why should I oppose the Nazis?" to be a reasonable question

That will backfire if his son gets convicted.

McCain wasn't running in 2016.

Or if the popular vote mattered. She did beat trump by 2.1%… just not in the right states/areas to get the win.

This is one way to simp for trump I guess

Even better, how much better would things be if the republikkklowns weren't racist, hateful clowns?

I don't know I think that's kind of a shitty thing to generalize about. Not sure where your located, but atleast here in the US there are plenty of folks who join the military at a young age to get themselves out of bad situations and try to correct the course of their life. Obviously there are a lot of people who join because of some dangerous nationalistic or racist ideals, but that structure and purpose can help some folks.

Buddy, you do calculus under fire and report back to me how well you do. By the way, if you take too long you die. If you get the wrong answer, your friend dies.

From experience, you're not wrong. Let's be honest, being a service member doesn't separate them from their faults as humans. You take an undereducated kid from Mississippi and make him a Soldier, they're still that undereducated kid with no critical reasoning skills.

The military actually rejected Trump pretty hard. Enough conservatives in the military refused to vote for him in 2020 that it went blue for the first time since at least the Dixie Flip in the sixties. They aren't the group you should be worried about.

Show them Lindsay Graham saying D-Day was a failure. Next we need to set one of those idiots up to say something bad about a medal of honor winner. Shouldn't be too hard. "Hey would you stand in front of an angry mob like Randy Shugart or Gary Gordon?"

Narcissists are like this even without dementia.

Dont use em you lose em

I wish I could find the quote, but Rudy said almost exactly that about him and Trump.

That's the joke

It's so fuckin' funny how his apologists will ignore a mile-high stack of his personal deficits to point to a solitary instance of someone in his administration making a humane decision and attributing that to the most selfish prick who has ever ascended to the presidency.

Just ROFL.

Ah yes, of course, doing something right obviously means none of the wrong happened.

So…. dumpster fires can still provide warmth, what’s your point?

Just block, don't argue. A person who would post this while ignoring everything he's said in public, and then force you to debate them on whether he ever said anything in public? That's not good faith. Block. This is not a person you want to talk to.

Hmmm... A department of Justice press release written in 2021 praising a current administration effort. Sounds like something that must be 100% factual and not written for any other reason than pure truthiness.

Dental plan!

Check. So he confirmed it, without realizing himself. That means he double confirmed it imo.

He still wouldn't lose any supporters.

legally carry a gun

Watch states try to find ways to allow him within their borders.

Ugh...again?

Cheeseberders.

Sorry I was being a bit facetious, for the Streisand Effect.

And I've been meta-whooshed or something! 🙂

You're right. Don't be hard on yourself.

Good point. I was referring to leaders that visit warzones to support allies and so on. He would never do that.

Okay, he was and is a coward who browned a pair of pants the second anyone brought up the mere possibility he might be drafted.

And to be clear the people who refused to go, who burned their draft cards at protests, or even just stayed home until the police showed up aren't in this picture. Trump proactively got a doctor to lie so he wouldn't have to worry about it.

Think about someone watching all 3 Back to the Futures and coming away from them thinking Biff Tannen was the real hero in each story.

Trump voters.

They absolutely are voting against their interest but these are the people who only pay attention to politics 2 months every four years. There are people who will vote for Trump because of the stimulus payments that he delayed just so he can have his signature on it. Even though Biden got families even more assistance. When people are struggling they blame the president.

I'm afraid that gen z may be more red then we expect simply because they can't afford to live on their own. Biden needs to put stronger restrictions on utility companies and landlords but there are even Democrats who won't allow that.

Endlessly eat, shit, fuck, fight, and consume for 5,000 years without any regard for anything but ourselves.

To be fair, it seems that many of Jim Jones' supporters woke up when they were at the end of a gun being commanded to commit suicide.

It took that.

Those guys probably had it easy though. They didn't even have drone strikes or surface to air missiles in that war. They didn't even have AC so these wimps never had to deal with hours of a boring trial in a freezing cold court room like today's heroes have had to do.

Ahh. My mistake. I thought it was about visiting Normandy.