Pope will attend G7 meeting to discuss AI
Pope will attend G7 meeting to discuss AI
It is the first time a pontiff will take part in the inner-workings of the G7 Summit. #EuropeNews

Greg Clarke @lemmy.ca
Religion has competition now, AI is also profiting from hallucinations that lots of people believe as fact.
59 2 Replyamino @fediverse.omaramin.me
@lemmyreader sounds like the start of a joke
33 0 ReplyBearOfaTime @lemm.ee Indeed.
Stay in your lane, "Pope". (quotes because this guy doesn't follow the rules of his own religion)
12 0 Replylemmyreader @lemmy.ml OP @amino@fediverse.omaramin.me I fear it is not a joke.
1 0 Reply
b000rg @midwest.social Good idea, let's put the guy who covers up for pedophiles into the discussion on ethical AI.
20 1 Replyeran_morad @lemmy.world To discuss what, exactly? AI simulations of underaged kids performing sex acts on old perverts?
16 1 ReplyJillyB @beehaw.org He saw that pic of the Pope with drip and it spooked him. This is a joke but that pic actually spooked me. It was the first AI pic I saw that I thought was a real photo.
7 0 Replylemmyreader @lemmy.ml OP What ?
7 0 ReplyNuclearDolphin @lemmy.ml I knew it was fake, but I choose to believe it's real.
1 0 Reply
HowMany @lemmy.ml Imaginary gods. Imaginary computer problems. What's next? The church's take on monetary issues?
7 0 ReplyMuchPineapples @lemmy.world
Probably crypto, that's basically just imaginary money, it's right up their alley.
1 0 Reply
beefbot @lemmy.blahaj.zone Yeah… the Pope is going to argue for more child AI porn so his precious widdle church can pay out less money in lawsuit damages …
BECAUSE OF ALL THE CHILDREN THAT CATHOLIC PRIESTS FUCK
5 1 Replyfunkless_eck @sh.itjust.works I wanna ding his little hat like a hotel reception bell
2 0 Replydavel [he/him] @lemmy.ml
PipedLinkBot @feddit.rocks
BOTHere is an alternative Piped link(s):
Work hard, increase production, prevent accidents, and be happy.
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
2 0 Reply