World News @lemmy.world Abovethefold @lemmy.ml 10mo ago

China must stop aiding Russia if it seeks good relations with West, NATO says

ptv-news.com.pk /china-must-stop-aiding-russia-if-it-seeks-good-relations-with-west-nato-says/

42 comments

Why limit one self to only one side, when you can play both?
- You're not supposed to tell us you're playing both sides!
  
  "Gonna do something about it? No? Like the taste of cheap definitely-not-made-by-slave-labor goods too much? That's what we thought."
Well I don't think it does, so that's an easy decision for them. They want to be just friendly enough that we keep buying their stuff and educating their youth.
- Yeah, we buy all our stuff from them, no way we'd actually impose meaningful sanctions.
That's not the reason for the trade war and embargoes.
why would they want that?
- They'd like to keep exporting their goods
  
  they would, but have the entire rest of the world if the west proves too antagonistic to their interests, they are also maneuvering their economy to their own markets. its convenient but not smart to be relying too hard on their opponents in a cold war.
China knows the Republicans are going to gut NATO,

China doesn't care,

China is committed to breaking the West's dominion, which is why it's making Russia into its vassal-state, totally-dependent-on-China, but with accountability/responsibility not having any direct-line into China, in the 1st place..

Once Trump's finished destroying the US, then .. then the real action will begin, militarily.

Give that about 1 dozen, or less, years, to occur.

ContinuousHammerfall's when the NATO-allied countries have been gutted, bankrupted, torn-apart through "populist dictatorship", etc, and suddenly the triple-alliance throws EVERYthing they've got against us, to break our capability...

Between now & then should be 2 more stages:

economic-collapse, which Trump uses to gain & secure dictatorship,

& the butchering of NATO & the West, economically, which should last .. roughly 7 or 8 years, or so.

Once those're done, then the WW3 tantrum/pogrom can begin.
- 1 dozen
  
  You can just say 12 if you like.
NATO is insignificant compared with Asia
- It's a shame you are being downvoted because you are quite correct. Nato mat be rich but it only represents around 15% of the global population.
  
  Massive populations do not equal political power
  
  Ya know if the fucking British hadnt conquered all of India and most of the world maybe your point qould be sailent. If anything its a lot easier to take down regions with large populations, namely by destroying food supplies and food imports.
  
  Exactly. Well it was expected, it’s the hype
  
  someone tell Nigeria they become a global superpower by 2050 then
Maybe the US and NATO must stop aiding Ukraine if they seeks good relations with China?
- We'll stop aiding Ukraine when the invaders leave, thanks.
- I guess the US should have just let Imperial Japan take China since apparently now all you need to do is want to grab territory real bad and that is enough justification.
  
  It always been or how do you think the US got more than its half from Mexico? Duh?
- Didn’t have the balls to use your real account?
- Maybe China should aid Ukraine. And Palestine and Global South countries being invaded. They could free Tibet, and not attack Taiwan, Philippines, Vietnam etc while they're at it.
- We really shouldnt be trading with China IMO, better to start cutting off that gangrenous limb as soon as possible.

42 comments