Light-based “LiFi” is stunningly fast, notably fragile—and now standardized
Light-based “LiFi” is stunningly fast, notably fragile—and now standardized
224GB/s, killer security, no radio interference—but you can't block the beam.
-
Light is almost certainly the fastest thing around. So it makes sense that "light-based wireless communications," or LiFi, could blow the theoretical doors off existing radio-wave wireless standards, to the tune of a maximum 224GB per second. [Edit, 2:40 p.m.: It does not make sense, and those doors would remain on each rhetorical vehicle. As pointed out by commenters, radio waves, in a vacuum, would reasonably be expected to travel at the same speed as light. Ars, but moreso the author personally, regrets the error. Original post continues.]
JFC is this really where you want to get your technology data from? Authors that clearly have no grasp of even the basest fundamentals in the physics involved? Really?
-
It's a news site, don't expect them to have science degree and them adding an edit note after they were corrected shows more integrity than 95% of other news sites.
-
shows more integrity than 95% of other news sites
Nah, there are many news sites that post corrections. This one was just so blatantly egregious that they had to put a stop to it before their entire corporation became a laughing stock. This isn't just a 'news site'. It is a Technology News Site. They had one job and they f'd it up. They shouldn't even be hiring writers without a science degree let alone one that flunked highschool science.
-
-
Light is almost certainly the fastest thing around.
why is that written as if it's some sort of challenge
-
Because my ability to disappoint may be faster.
-
-
The worst part of it is that the author also included this quote from the creators of the technology.
“Operating in the optical spectrum, rather than the limited amount of licensed radio wavelengths”
Like it’s right there and they still didn’t clue in.
-
Agreed! I mean the article is interesting but also somewhat click-baitish. I get where you're coming from.
-
Yeah, first thing I noticed as well. Hilarious how the guy has no idea what he is talking about
-
-
Isn't this similar to the tech used in fiber optics cables? Or am I way off
-
But it is for wifi communication apparently. Unfortunately short wave lengths are absorbed more easily than longer wave lengths as the current radio/microwave solutions. That is the main physical limitations to overcome
-
That is the main physical limitations to overcome
Yeah, they just need to do more research and in few years we'll break the laws of physics.
-
-
No, they basically replaced a WIFI Router antenna with a TV IR Remote (with all the issues they have) and said 'teh new hotness!'. Fibre optics uses light too, but, the wire is designed to unimpede the signal.
-
-
There is potential here, despite the early Wi-Fi-via-flashlight awkwardness. While you can't turn a LiFi point entirely off, the signal has integrity at 10 percent room illumination (60 lux), and LiFiCo's FAQ suggests future use of the invisible parts of the light spectrum.
Why didn't they start with IR? IR natural sources? Because artificial sources are your TV remove and security cameras.
So the bulb works at low illuminations but what about light interferences? If you have other light sources, windows?
-
but... the radio waves used in wifi are... already the same phenomenon as light