Skip Navigation
161 comments

  • "We have investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing"

  • doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt doubt

  • The reason is that it has not issued any findings yet. It is going to in a few months.

    This is clever wordplay, nothing more.

    Edit: fuck me, it's as if no one gives a shit about the truth anymore. It's all kneejerk reactions.

    This is a non-story. Governments don't just willy nilly declare that somebody has or has not committed a war crime. It goes through an entire process. That process has not completed yet (in the US anyway). There are no findings yet. Therefore until the findings are released, the US has not found that Israel has done anything.

    • So in your opinion the US will bring the genociders to court a few months after there's no one left to kill and that's normal

      • You must be very new to the world. You really think a nuclear power will ever be held fully accountable for the bad things that they do?

        Perhaps you and the bridge guy need to have a conversation. I hear that it's in a gorgeous location near Brooklyn.

    • You seem to be a very savvy individual. Would you be interested in purchasing a bridge?

    • So in your opinion the US will bring the genociders to court a few months after there's no one left to kill and that's normal

  • Meanwhile Joe Bellend has given what, over R600 billion ZAR to Isisrael to destroy R500 billion ZAR of infrastructure, rendered all public services inoperable or at best terminal, a homicide rate of 3.6%+ and in the northern half, the equivalent of Nelson Mandela Bay wiped from the map with a food crisis bordering that of Auschwitz (no this is not an exaggeration). Most if not all consular services have also been destroyed, leaving numbers of "external refugees" to seek aid from the UN, whose functions are also in terminal crisis.

    All this with massive praise from the cracker-sphere, whose rhetoric becomes more bloodthirsty by the day, with the stance of "every man, woman, child and infant between Gaza and Gauteng is a terrorist" also starting to become prevalent. Except Ireland; Ireland is the only actually good western country.

    The Jihad against the "African Christian Democratic Party" and the "South African Friends of Israel" will continue until conditions improve.

  • That is what we call a lie by stating a correct statement.

    Why? It is only a correct statement because Israel has and had already violated International Law before the recent Gaza war.

    A truthful statement would be, "Israel continues to break international law in the current Gaza War as it has done for years and per over 30 UN Resolutions."

    The power of words, friends.

  • As much as I hate it, from my understanding he's right (expect for genocide). The UN doesn't recognize Palestine as a country. Ergo internal conflict

    Genocide is one of the only ways a country can break international laws without an international conflict

    • The UN does not recognize a Palestinian government the UN charter explicitly described both the states of Palestine and Isreal

    • Good point well made.

      It is also a fair note. That neither Palestine or Israel has any real claim. The state that owned the land. The otterman empire. No longer existed when the land was allocated.

      And while the UK allocation of peoples homes was crappy. The fact that the Palestinian peoples leaders refuse to accept any compromise that allows the existence of Israel. Is also the reason the current mess exists.

      All sides are pretty fucked up here.

      • It is also a fair note. That neither Palestine or Israel has any real claim. The state that owned the land. The otterman empire. No longer existed when the land was allocated.

        What the actual fuck are you talking about. Like seriously, what does it matter that the ottoman empire ruled the land, the Palestinians (including a number of orthodox Jews) lived there. That's their fucking claim to it

        And while the UK allocation of peoples homes was crappy. The fact that the Palestinian peoples leaders refuse to accept any compromise that allows the existence of Israel. Is also the reason the current mess exists.

        Do you want to interrogate this further, why was it crappy, could it be because the UK had a vested interest in creating a colonial project? And why should the Palestinians compromise, colonizers are coming in, removing them from their homes and killing them indescriminately. How can you even compromise with Israel when they continue to illegally steal land on the west bank and golan heights (and of they had their way Sinai too)

        All sides are pretty fucked up here.

        Go fuck yourself

161 comments