China to ICJ: Palestine has ‘inalienable right’ to armed resistance
China to ICJ: Palestine has ‘inalienable right’ to armed resistance
China tells ICJ: Palestinian ‘use of force to resist oppression is an inalienable right’
-
Isn't it weird that I can't find any western media outlets reporting this? Super weird right, I just can't figure out why.
-
Look over there Trump just said something stupid!
-
Democracy Now has a good segment on it
-
I wouldn't say any, but I did find two UK-based.
I'm just wondering if this is really a priority to report on its own.
-
It's the second most powerful and influential nation in the world saying the Palestinian armed resistance is completely valid.
Yes it's a priority report.
-
-
-
cannot be equated with terrorism
The only terrorists here are the "israeli" militants.
-
love how that guy who climbed the fence and got shot by his own guys on the walk back wasn't considered a terrorist by the media despite 1) being a lone wolf and 2) not operating as part of an authorised military action. I suppose that latter point is because all Israeli's take part in an authorised military action as an occupying force every second of every day.
-
-
A notorious, convicted terrorist said Palestine should resist by any means necessary.
That was Nelson Mandela
-
The ANC didn't liberate South Africa with a cute hunger strike in prison.
-
-
Finally someone with some international clout says the obvious
-
the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry
-
never mind the 70 million dead following his "reforms"
-
Wonder what happened in the 1950s that caused this massive jump in life expectancy in China 🤔
-
-
-
BREAKING: HAMAS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
We appreciate the position expressed by the People's Republic of China, during the public hearings held by the International Court of Justice, on the legal consequences of the occupation policies in the Palestinian Territory, and its affirmation of the legality of the occupied peoples' pursuit of self-determination, by various means, including armed resistance, and the necessity not to confuse terrorism with And the armed struggle practiced by the Palestinian people against the Zionist occupation.
We also value the positions of the countries participating in the sessions, which confirmed the widespread violations of international law practiced by the terrorist occupation entity against the Palestinian people and their occupied land, including massacres and genocide in the Gaza Strip, violations, killing, and expansion of settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem, and work to bring about demographic changes in the Palestinian land. It aims to Judaize her and tamper with her identity.
The terrorist occupation government’s boycott of the court sessions confirms once again its disregard for international institutions, and its policy of turning its back on international resolutions and commitments, which requires a clear position from the international community to end the rogue Zionist occupation, and to stop all its violations and crimes against our Palestinian people.
-
This seems like a huge deal
-
I love that the generic lib response to this is to engage in Whataboutism regarding Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan. If you see someone doing this, remember to ask them how many countries recognize Palestine as a state versus any of those other places.
-
Really weird that libs continue to hang into any sentiment regarding Tibet when the Dalai Lama literally just tried to get a child to suck on his tongue in public just last year.
-
Also its beyond meaningless when you consider that at most idk 3% of the population of Xinjiang and 1% in Tibet is considering themselves to be occupied by China and are remotely likely to participate or aid in an armed struggle against the CPC, even at the best possible conditions
Like sure, Tibetians have a right to engage in an armed anti-colonial struggle or kickstart an indeginous liberation movement ok. You probably couldnt even fill an NBA stadium with those willing so what does that leave their lib free Tibet dreams. The CIA was trying to recruit and instigate an anti-chinese sessesionist movement last century and they gave up because they couldnt find enough willing Tibetians to get the project off the ground. And they had a budget of dozens and dozens of millions to pay off poor ass Tibetians and they still couldnt find any fertile sessesionist sentiment. And thats on record
-
And thats on record
Got a good link handy?
-
-
-
I thought China was on team Israel. Or maybe I'm confused because they're helping Russia, and Russia is on team Israel? International politics is weird sometimes.
-
Russia joined Iran last season when Iran started helping them in Ukraine, so they're def. Team Hamas.
-
For decades China's policy has been team territorial integrity (ie borders were set in 1948, and people shouldn't talk about them). Previously this meant supporting the 1967 borders. Their current position is still consistent with this (Israel still occupies the west bank), and has the added bonus of improving relations in the region which China has already invested a good deal in (see belt and road initiative)
Honestly this is one of the more straightforward cases of geopolitics, shit like the Nigerian Civil war however...
-
-
I was wondering why so many comments with any criticism against China were being downvoted.
Then I noticed which instance this was posted on.
And then all those comments were removed by mods. Which only proved their points.
-
Welcome to Lemmy. It's not quite as full of false western propaganda about their geopolitical rivals as Reddit is.
Well, maybe except LW. Saw someone with a zionazi flag in their username there once.
-
This place is filled with crazy people. You will go mad if you start arguing with them.
-
