Backdoors that let cops decrypt messages violate human rights, EU court says
Backdoors that let cops decrypt messages violate human rights, EU court says
Cops have alternative means to access encrypted messages, court says.
-
"While indiscriminate backdoors might be cheaper for the State than alternative investigative measures, they were expensive for society at large on account of the security risks they produced," EISI told the ECHR.
It's great when someone with some sway actually gets it.
-
EU institutions are pretty great, but sooner or later they're going to lose the fight against the technofascist nightmare that's constantly getting pushed on us
-
-
I feel like Europe is the only place actually making an effort to protect personal privacy these days.
-
That's because Europe has actual experience with having their privacy invaded and it wasn't just to show you relevant ads. During the war my grandparents burned letters and books after reading them. And they had nothing to hide either - and all of the ones they burned were perfectly innocent and legal... but even those can be taken out of context and used against you during a police investigation.
The UN formally declared privacy as a human right a few years after the war ended. Specifically in response to what happened during the war.
A lot of the data used by police to commit horrific crimes was collected before the war, for example they'd go into a cemetery home and find a list of people who attended a funeral six years ago, then arrest everyone who was there. You can't wait for a government to start doing things like that - you have to stop the data from being collected in the first place.
Imagine how much worse it could be today, with so much more data collected and automated tools to analyse the data. Imagine if you lived in Russian occupied Ukraine right now - what data can Russia find about you? Do you have a brother serving in Ukraine's army? Maybe your brother would defect if you were taken hostage...
-
Well, it defers a lot from country to country.
For example, populations in the Scandinavian countries have high trust in their governments and let them collect a lot of private data. They have personal identification numbers that contain lots of personal information that many institutions (e.g. banks) have access to unless you ask for privacy protection. All of this also makes interaction with institutions very streamlined and easy, but it comes at the cost of less privacy.
In Norway and Sweden, for example, anyone can access personal income data about anyone living in the country. Full transparency, more or less.
On the other hand, a country like Germany does not issue personal identification numbers because the population is highly skeptical of data collection and registration, a remnant from the wars. Germany is much more bureaucratic and its government less efficient, but Germans prefer the arm's length approach to government data collection and almost no data is publicly accessible.
-
And they had nothing to hide either - and all of the ones they burned were perfectly innocent and legal... but even those can be taken out of context and used against you during a police investigation.
If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.
Cardinal Richelieu
-
-
-
Such a big win. What a fantastic week.
-
Finally, good news. I can't believe we need to go to court just to be allowed to have encrypted conversations. It's MY conversation and MY data.
-
-
This is incredibly funny for people who followed this. Everybody and their grandma told the European Commission that there was no way that breaking end-to-end encryption was compatible with the law. Yet they constantly pushed for it anyway and now look at this mess.
I am almost certain that the European Commission will claim that there are still ways to break end-to-end encryption, only to defeated in court yet again. Like they tried with data preservation for law enforcement purposes. They just can't stop themselves.
-
The commissioner responsible for the chat control was thoroughly corrupt by a company which created the scanning system. She was also either unbelievably dense or very, VERY dedicated to her role of a pearl-clutching, think-of-the-children granny. To the point of arguing with IT specialists on TV.
-
It is difficult to get someone to understand something when their salary depends on them not understanding it.
-
It is difficult to get someone to understand something when their chain of non-executive board membersgips, gold-plated "consulting" contracts in the private sector and speech gigs depends on them not understanding it.
FIFY
-
-
-
Ah my never ending love for EU . Is there a way to donate to the EU ?
-
I'm a EU Citizen, you can send me the Money 🥸
-
Never idolise. Courts simply apply the laws, and good laws were likely written by inspired people and approved in a good political climate. These two conditions are not static.
-
Maybe buy stuff there? A lot of vpns and other privacy companies and orgs are European.
-
Will do in the future i am currently using proton
-
-
It's ECHR, it's not affiliated with the EU.
-
Move to EU and pay taxes there. Or buy European products, they pay taxes and some of it go to the EU.
-
Moving to EU is better option if you can afford it. You'll also get healthcare and other stuff.
-
beyerdynamic headphones are made in germany, highly recommend.
-
-
They fund their political campaigns via taxes and put limits on spending and campaign seasons, just buy european-made instead if you're a fan.
-
Didn't find anything quickly, but if you want to donate towards Germany paying back its debts: IBAN DE17 8600 0000 0086 0010 30, put "Schuldentilgung" in the purpose field.
-
Don't. They already get way to much taxes and while these are the shining examples of what the EU should be and are beacon of hope...there are other utterly ridiculous laws and stupid regulations we have to deal with. Don't get me wrong, I'm proud to be European and so on, but it's not the bright haven some people make it to be...
-
-
Maybe one day, the land of personal freedom and Liberty can have a small amount of the personal freedom and Liberty often declared by the “globalist big government” EU.
-
EU: "This violates human rights"
US: "Human rights? What are those? Are they in the constitution?"
Yeah, I wish the US could get some of those mysterious rights
-
US: “Human rights? What are those? Are they in the constitution?”
There actually are strong privacy rights written into the constitution. Unfortunately they don't fit well with modern data collection creating loopholes big enough to drive a truck through.
And nothing is being done to close those loopholes. In fact the opposite... end to end encryption, for example, would close most of the loopholes. Legislators are using "think of the children!" arguments to try to stop companies from upgrading services to use E2EE.
-
-
-
Glad to see that it was Russians who went to court for human rights.
-
People from Russia and other ex-USSR states sue their governments in ECHR all the time. Sometimes those governments even pay the fines.
I mean, glad that you're glad.
-
*Happy Navalny noises*
-
Reported dead 2024-02-16 11:22utc, exactly the moment you posted your comment.
huh
-
-
-
The ECHR is not an EU court, it's a Council of Europe court, different organisation.
Edit: To make things more confusing, the EU is in negotiations about joining the Council of Europe.
-
I tok great pleasure in making my Brexiter dad look a tit by asking what he disliked about the EU. "Well I'm sick of their human rights court telling us what to do! So I'm voting we leave the EU!"
Me: "But we'd still be covered by the ECHR. Are you thinking of the ECJ?"
I don't speak to him anymore cos he's a cunt*.
*Not politics - he's just a cunt who doesn't approve of my 'lifestyle choices' (childless, gay and mentally ill).
-
lifestyle choices
lol, you should have made better choices with the ? thing you can control of those.
/s
-
-
-
EU, I belive in you!
-
Good to get this sort of ruling on the books.