Skip Navigation

Dude, where’s my self-driving car? The many, many missed deadlines for a fully autonomous vehicular future.

28 comments
  • Maybe instead of trying to train an AI powered car to deal with the insane chaos that is the road system, what if we designed something to remove that chaos? Maybe like a path that's just for these self driving cars. There's a network of paths to get you to your final destination.

    But if we did that, there'd still be our current problems of running out of fuel, or battery power. Which could be solved by electrifying those paths.

    But it'd be very difficult to have each of those individual cars switch between paths. Maybe it would be easier if instead of the cars switching paths, the people switched paths. Maybe we just make really long cars, and numerous people can get in them, and then switch cars as needed. People would need to know where to switch between these long cars. So we'd want to set schedules of when they're running to where, and then have an app or something that just told you where to get on and off.

    And if they're really long, maybe we could kickstart this before we have self-driving abilities anyway. We could just have one person in the front driving it.

    And maybe to reduce the need for rubber, instead of regular wheels on a road, they could just be metal wheels on metal tracks.

    Just throwing some ideas out there.

    • I saw the train conclusion coming from "a network of paths to reach your destination."

      I do think that rail is a great solution to a lot of modern transportation needs.

    • Thanks but not thanks, most people on the public transport are disgusting and weird... Although I can live with that, they would need to have 24/7 schedules and insecurity is a big downside too.

      Disclaimer, I actually don't know if trains work 24/7 as there is not a single one where I live (not for passengers at least) and even if there was insecurity still an issue, one of the disadvantages of living in a 3rd world country.

  • This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In 2015, the then-lead of Google’s self-driving car project Chris Urmson said one of his goals in developing a fully driverless vehicle was to make sure that his 11-year-old son would never need a driver’s license.

    In 2016, then-Lyft president John Zimmer claimed that “a majority” of the trips taking place on its ride-sharing network would be in fully driverless cars “within five years.” That same year, Business Insider said that 10 million autonomous vehicles would be on the road by 2020.

    But confined within geofenced service areas, held back by their own technological shortcomings, opposed by labor unions and supporters of more reliable modes of transportation, and restricted from driving on certain roads or in certain weather conditions.

    The amount of money flowing into the autonomous vehicle space also had the knock-on effect of convincing regulators to take a lax approach when it comes to self-driving cars.

    It’s released a number of studies and statistical analyses in recent years that it says proves its vehicles get in fewer crashes, cause less damage, and improve overall safety on the roads.

    Broken promises and failed predictions are what’s fueling the growing skepticism about self-driving cars in the public which, as the years plod by, gets more and more turned off by the idea of relinquishing control of their vehicles to a robot.


    The original article contains 1,485 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • I'm watching the show "Upload". I'm five episodes in and so far two people have already been killed by self-driving cars. Is this really the future everyone is looking forward to?

    • No, it's the future corporations are looking forward to: "You'll own nothing and be happy."

      The entire point of self-driving cars was to remove the hassle of selling directly to consumers and instead sell fleets to other corporations, intended for them to be constantly circling cities looking for people who need rides. Think Taxis but a million times worse and more congestion because it means every car that exists will always be somewhere on the road.

      Corporations have increasingly looked away from direct-to-consumer business because consumers are fickle and have less money than corporate coffers. American corporations have slowly become one big mess of just buying and selling to one another and leaving out the average consumer, instead only "renting" or "licensing" products to consumers.

      They don't care if human lives are lost in the process as long as they can crow about how much "safer" it is to trust the "perfect" machines unlike "imperfect" humans. All they really want is to be able to sell the same car, over and over again. They want the benefits of repossession without the hassle. They want a permanent income stream via their vehicles.

28 comments