NoisyFlake @lemm.ee wtf, is this just obscured javascript?
16 0 ReplyNailbar @sopuli.xyz
It looks like it's decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary.
But that's just a wild guess. I don't know what actual decompiled code looks like.
Edit: scratch that, it's just obfuscated code to make it harder to copy.
22 0 ReplySurpriseWaterfall @sopuli.xyz I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.
10 0 Replyhemmes @vlemmy.net
I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references.
1 0 Reply
bAZtARd @feddit.de An LLM could probably solve this much quicker than a human.
14 0 ReplySkyeStarfall @lemmy.blahaj.zone Finally, the ultimate weapon
A tool to parse horrible code
8 0 Reply
Himawari @lemmy.4d2.org
needs more jpeg
12 0 Replyhglman @lemmy.ml Then the machines could pass the test.
4 0 Reply
penguintrinity @discuss.tchncs.de Litterally me, before ChatGPT was a thing
4 0 Replyspeaker_hat @lemmy.one This is a nightmare material
2 0 Replyjeff 👨💻 @programming.dev
lgtm skip
2 0 Replysgtnasty @lemmy.ml
A nightmare of mine, prob all JS code too
1 0 Reply