You're viewing a single thread.
Hal-5700X @lemmy.world
Florida simulator.
I hope this is going to be good. But I'm not going to hold my breath. Because we are talking about Take-Two and Rockstar here.
31 3 ReplyThis is fine🔥🐶☕🔥 @lemmy.world
Help a woman who needs an abortion
⭐⭐⭐
40 4 ReplyOctopusKurwa @lemm.ee Tell kids about gay people
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
44 3 ReplySchadrach @lemmy.sdf.org Eh, since that law applies to classroom instruction, they'd have to save that one for a Bully sequel.
7 3 Reply
beefcat @lemmy.world
When has Rockstar themselves put out a bad game?
9 1 ReplyHal-5700X @lemmy.world
Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy – The Definitive Edition was bad.
EDIT Manhunt 2 was bad. When comparing it to the first game.
1 1 Replybeefcat @lemmy.world
i don’t really count remasters that were outsourced, that is 2k and grove street games’ sin
1 0 ReplyHal-5700X @lemmy.world
Rockstar did okay it.
1 0 Reply
Blackmist @feddit.uk
Take-Two are be pretty scummy (especially the sports game division), but Rockstar don't miss.
Expect evolution not revolution, but we're going back to Vice City, so count me in.
8 0 ReplyEcho Dot @feddit.uk I'm just concerned that they're going to go all in on GTA online 2.
They either need to make sure they put a huge amount of effort into the single player or they need to completely rework online play.
5 1 ReplyBlackmist @feddit.uk
They didn't for Red Dead 2. I don't see why they would for this.
I've haven't touched the multiplayer player content in any of their games, and never felt short changed by what I got.
6 0 Reply
mudstickmcgee @sh.itjust.works I was thinking the same, but then again taking a long time to put games out isn't the same as putting out broken games. I mean rdr, rdr2, and gtav are stellar games that launched without any glaring faults iirc. Taking time is fine as long as we get a complete product.
8 1 Replydangblingus @lemmy.dbzer0.com Ahh yes the "cautious gamer that doesn't think GTA is going to be good" archetype.
8 5 Reply