Skip Navigation

If many extraterrestrial civilizations were nearby but trying to keep quiet, how would you suggest drawing them out?

What do you think would finally be their, "Enough, we gotta say something!" situation?

Edit:
Put another way, what might serve as a cosmic icebreaker?

65 comments
  • Well I'm pretty sure as soon as those 179 episodes of The Apprentice that we broadcast in all directions for 11 years reaches an alien civilization it's going to provoke an attack that destroys the entire solar system.

  • This is one answer to the fermi paradox that makes no sense to me. If we did live in a dark forest universe where everyone was hiding from some oppressive existential threat, how would any of the civilisations learn about it?

    They would need to be in contact with one another to discover that other civilisations were being wiped out, but for that to happen, the wiping out civilisation would have to be able to find them as well. If they destroyed civ A, they'd definitely be able to find references to civ B in their ruins, somewhere. I see no mechanism by which a civilisation could observe this enemy in action without being detected.

    Unless someone has come up with an answer to this issue, in which case I'd like to see it.

    Also, if you can detect them, just telling them that you've detected them should change their strategy, because if a basic civilsation like ours can do it then they're not actually that safe by hiding. The dark forest seems like a really fragile arrangement.

    • The oppressive existential threat you reference doesn't need to exist for the universe to be a dark forest universe. It's enough for every sufficiently advanced civilization to realize that such a threat could exist and remain quiet and hidden just in case.

      • Right but that's fragile. All it takes is one group to break the ice and suddenly they're all talking.

        Also, is the theory that we could live in a dark forest because every single species is insular enough to be afraid of such a threat? That means they all have to believe in the threat and yet also no species is aggressive enough to become the threat. But none of them thinks, "Wait, either we're alone or everyone is hiding. If everyone is hiding, then the threat can't exist, so we may as well say something."

        Again, it's fragile. I find it completely unconvincing.

        The Prime Directive concept is way more believable to me, as is the idea that life is just sparse.

    • Well if you’re an advanced alien race, imagine hearing this on your airwaves

      “What a joyous day, our messages have been received we’ve made first contact with an unidentified vessel in our solar system “

      A few days later

      “oh god why? They’re killing everyone it’s a slaughter out there”

      And radio silence.

      And imagine every time you hear something it ends the same way.

      • Right but then that relies on not existing in a dark forest. That is, you can detect signs of alien life, but then those signs tell you horrible things.

        The situation we have is that we see nothing.

        I guess the answer is that some civilisations reach a point where they broadcast themselves and get destroyed, whilst other civilisations reach a point where they receive those broadcasts and don't reply before hearing the other civilisation get destroyed. So somehow they were listening at the exact right moment to discover that others are getting killed without responding, and that happened enough times that there is a whole universe full of quiet civilisations.

        I still don't see the A to B. I cannot imagine any species curious enough to detect alien life and insular enough to not respond. If we got those signs we would reply immediately, almost definitely.

  • I don't think that there is likely such a thing that would produce a direct response. If you wanted to not be noticed, why would you change your behavior based on what something else transmits?

  • It depends on why they're being quiet. In this scenario I think it'd be likely that they're being quiet for some reason that's literally incomprehensible to human-level minds, since they're likely millions or billions of years more advanced than we are. So it's impossible to predict what, if anything, might provoke them to break that silence.

    I guess sending a probe there and having it physically poke them might get some kind of reaction, at least.

    • In this scenario I think it’d be likely that they’re being quiet for some reason that’s literally incomprehensible to human-level minds, since they’re likely millions or billions of years more advanced than we are.

      Why's that? It's not an imposition on my part, especially given that unlike the usual scenarios where the reason one might imagine them to be more advanced is that they aren't nearby and are capable of reaching us from afar somehow.

      Scenario I've posed is pretty basic, say some extraterrestrial civilizations were nearby (say, we're both able to travel & communicate in a more timely fashion than waiting decades for each trip/exchange), but they're not talking to us because ??? and so...How might ya get'em to meet & talk?

  • This reminds me of the six possibilities for extra terrestrial life, one of which is everyone is listening and no one is broadcasting.

  • Humans have shown time and time again in their history that they are expansionist, imperialistic assholes. For aliens to be spooked, we only need to show that tendency on a cosmic scale. If we start sending out probes or even manned missions to far away places that are barely likely to support life, we will instantly label ourselves as greedy conquerors. As soon as a colony of ours starts sending out new missions to create even more colonies, that's when all civilizations, even the less advanced, realize that we're the first stage of a cosmic cancer that must be nipped in the bud at all costs.

65 comments