GitHub: Can no longer search code without being logged in.
GitHub: Can no longer search code without being logged in.
Select Topic Area Product Feedback Body This is revolting and an anathema to the open source movement. A movement, I might add, Microsoft is abusing here. We're told that this is for security... Bu...
Response from Martin Woodward, GitHub's VP of Developer Relations:
Sorry for the inconvenience @koepnick - while searching across all repos has required being logged in for a long time, when we enhanced the search capabilities earlier in the 2023 we had to extend this to repos as well (see https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-07-code-search-now-requires-login/).
This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.
-
Microsoft is terrible. Remember they also require you to use a Microsoft account for Minecraft now. Fuck this company so much
-
And they're also deleting/deleted all classic Minecraft accounts from before that. They invented an incredibly weird and needlessly obtuse process to extend the migration deadline by 3 months (true final deadline is now mid December 2023), but that's seemingly it. Everyone not paying too much attention to their email just gets $30 worth of game deleted because of a completely arbitrary decision.
-
Anyone without access to their old email also loses their account. I don't remember which email address I used with my account back in the day (it's at least ten years old), and since I bought my key from a reseller, I don't have a receipt. Microsofts response was basically "not our problem, guess you'll have to pay us again ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"
-
I just let my mincraft license lapse instead of migrating. Fuck em I'll pirate it from now on.
-
Have you tried Minetest? It's pretty good, and not Java based so a lot more lightweight.
-
-
Wasn't this a pre-microsoft change?
-
Microsoft purchased GitHub in 2018. This change happened this year.
-
-
-
This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.
So, Azure's bot protection is crap. Good to know.
-
Google can accommodate billions of searches globally on pages it doesn't control
Microsoft can't index a tiny fraction of that number, even for it's own users.
What a black eye for Microsoft engineering.
-
TBF going by load times, GitHub search was perpetually on the brink of collapse since well before the Microsoft acquisition. I daren't imagine what the indexes look like.
-
Its* own users.
-
-
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
-
I migrated a few code repositories from Github to GitLab literally the same day it was announced that Microsoft was acquiring Github.
The only regret I have is not evaluating a few other options like Codeberg or whatever. But GitLab's much better than Github.
-
Gitlab requiring a phone number verified account to report bugs kinda turned me off of that platform. Never used Codeberg but heard good things.
-
I don't have a (usable) phone number.
I've reported bugs.
I've contributed code.
How did I skate?
-
Codeberg is awesome, it's just like github but open source and self-hostable (forgejo)
-
-
Self hosted gitlab
-
-
This has been implemented since like 2016, this is not news lol.
-
Searching across repos was disabled for anonymous visitors in 2016.
Searching within a repo was disabled for anonymous visitors in 2023.
-
-
Can someone tell me why this is unreasonable?
-
I think it kind of flies in the face of what Open Source Software should be. They're walling off code behind accounts in the Microsoft ecosystem.
-
I think it’s kind of a slippery slope; but I don’t think the search itself being login walled is apocalyptic. As long as anonymous users can clone the repositories and browse the code, I can kind of understand why they don’t want to pay to run an elastic search cluster for bots’ benefit. Presumably in-repo search could be done locally by scrapers’ hardware.
But if it turns into “login to view this repository” then GitHub will have turned evil.
-
They're not walling off any code. They're restricting use of their server-side search resources. Other repository hosting services don't have code search at all.
-
-
On its own, it's not. But it's going to be one step on the path to shit-town.
-
-
GitLab, OneDev, Gitea, etc > shithub
-
I'm pretty sure this only applies to non-indexed repos right?
indexing is a very expensive process and usually takes 5-10 minutes for repos with 10k+ lines, and letting non-registered users start it is not the best idea in the first place -
This has been around for a while. It may be so they can track and throttle LLMs hovering up public code repos.
Either way, it's a meh. Not sure why anyone would want to clutch their pearls over this. For those who need it, self-hosted gitlab is available.
-
I'm not sure LLMs will need to use the search facility when they could clone the repo.
-
-
Extinguish
-
I'm not sure how this impacts 99.99% of all users...
-
Skewed stats much? Most people in the world dont have a github account. So it impacts 100% of non-user visitors
-