Skip Navigation
117 comments
  • What I hate about this is that they say things like "Try the best to protect users' privacy" etc then do shits like this

    • Well, they need to know your device rotation to serve you the perfect ads! /s
      Seriously, I wouldn't mind them knowing a thing or two about me, when I'm using their services. But tracking everything, just because they can, is just obnoxious. If you would translate this to the real world, you would definitely get arrested when you would stand on the corner of the street, noting down everything you see, every dimension/detail of every person walking by. You would be labeled "creep". But if Facebook does it, governments go like: You can build your new data center right here, don't mind the measly peasants that currently live in the village nearby

  • I mean... many of those are reasonable? I don't see how checking the available device memory, screen resolution, screen rotation, etc are bad since the app could use them to improve the experience. Lower RAM = don't preload as many posts, lower screen resolution = load smaller images, etc. all of which need to send flags to the server (a smaller number of posts to load, the max dimensions of images to return, etc)

    • This is obviously not the case when your client could just directly request things within it's resource limits.

      Seriously, why would you give Meta the benefit of the doubt? These are just more datapoints to profile and analyze users.

      • These are just more datapoints to profile and analyze users.

        I'm just being realistic. Seeing it in DuckDuckGo just means the app has requested that data - they don't actually know exactly how it's used. Just seeing that the data is loaded by the app doesn't mean anything. So far, nobody has actually been able to prove that any of this data is used for profiling users. Analyzing network traffic isn't too difficult so there'd likely be proof by now if it was actually happening (like Wireshark captures).

117 comments