Skip Navigation

(Controversial) Should lemmy.world close registrations at a certain user count?

To support decentralization and spread, should lemmy.world close registration at some point to prevent a performance overload due to too many users? Of course, if registration is disabled, there could be a hint placed somewhere near that from other instances you can interact with content on lemmy.world just like you had registered on it. There could be a link to join-lemmys instance overview.

71 comments
  • I don't think it's necessarily worth it to close, as others have pointed out it's a great real-world stress test for the software.

    I DO think it's very much worth having some info on the signup page to let people know

    • they're welcome to join but the server is currently overloaded and experiencing performance issues
    • they don't need to sign up there to access the content

    and of course

    • where to go instead

    Then everyone is informed and can make up their own mind instead of blindly signing up and assuming this is just what Lemmy is like.

    • Maybe Guides / Information could be shown on the lemmy web frontend by default to lower the entry barrier?

      • Having something there would definitely be wise I think, given how many people are apparently just being sent links direct to a specific instance to sign up (and therefore skipping join-lemmy entirely). But it would need to be very short, to the point, and sum things up in a way non-techy folks can immediately understand. In my experience so far, a lot of people here struggle to explain the basic concept without writing a whole esseay about it, and nobody is gonna read a wall of text on the signup page.

  • I do think there should be a hard limit to the number of total users in an instance. Otherwise as you said the content will get centralised in a specific instance. But that limit should be much higher than what lemmy.world now has. Also closing new registration at this time would be detrimental to the overall ecosystem. This is just my personal opinion.

    • Having the user count far exceed what the servers can handle is also detrimental to the ecosystem.

      People aren't patient. And the current instability we're seeing will just make people give up on Lemmy after a brief attempt to settle in.

      • You raise a valid point. But finding new communities is much harder in smaller instances. So there is a chance the user will not find content they are interested in.

  • I think it should redirect users to other instances. But ultimately, we need account migration like mastodon.

  • I think strategic, times windows where sign ups are paused, in order to help distribute users, might be necessary. I don't think that's optimal for user experience, but I feel like if volume of sign ups stays where it is, that it's probably needed.

  • Maybe it would be a good idea to put up a request for people to register elsewhere, but honestly, where? Randos naturally gravitate to large servers so if the largest one closes, it gets confusing unless there's one that is ready as a direct replacement.

    • People figured out everyone doesn’t need to use the same exact X to have access to the same things X provides many times throughout civilization. Maybe the join page needs to communicate it better, but also people need to try to figure it out.

  • nope, that would make the experience way worse with federation not working well with communities. like for example I've made a community over on lemmy.world and it has a couple of members and a few posts in it, but I can't see it from any other lemmy instances I've tried (unless it doesn't work if you're not logged in). you can kinda make kbin see it but to make posts appear you have to search for them and if you search for them before you search for the community, they appear in a random magazine and then when the magazine for that community is created the posts that were put in random stay there and never return... so yeah...

71 comments