Your Fitbit is useless – unless you consent to unlawful data sharing
Your Fitbit is useless – unless you consent to unlawful data sharing
noyb filed three complaints against Fitbit. The health and fitness company forces new app users to consent to data transfers
-
Just here to push https://gadgetbridge.org/
Get a smartwatch, replace the stock companion app with Gadgetbridge.
Watch talks to Gadgetbridge, Gadgetbridge talks to watch. All over Bluetooth.
Gadgetbridge has no internet access, up or down. It cannot send out any of your data. It remains sandboxed on your phone.
You can totally uninstall the stock companion app.
-
I notice FitBit isn't supported though.
Although that's understandable. The wife had one and it wouldn't talk to the official app reliably either.
-
Yeah these manufacturers make it harder to connect to, i already have to get the decryption key from the SQL database of the MiBand app to use my MiBand with Gadgetbridge. I guess FitBit saves it somewhat safe, that's why it's unsupported
-
-
I like the idea of this. At present time it doesn't look like any Fitbit-branded devices are supported, unless I'm missing something.
-
I really wanted to use gadget bridge. But they only support obscure watches and some Chinese knock offs.
Amazing concept, but I guess its really hard to reverse engineer some of the protocols these major watch/fitness trackers use.
-
-
Any fitness watch with internet access, by definition, is spyware, yes or yes. Personal and health data are too succulent for large companies not to turn them into profits. There are fitness apps that save data locally, if you want to monitor your health status during your workouts, there is no need for a Cloudservice for this purpose, the data from a workout is not so much that it cannot be saved on a cheap SD card, with much a transfer via Bluetooth to the PC or Mobile, if you want to review this data.
-
I use an Apple Watch. It regularly (about every 2 weeks) to review who and what data I’m sharing with studies. I can easily opt out again, and the system is opt in only.
-
No different than the situation with iPhones and Android phones, really. Apple has made their money once you buy the device, and views your personal data as a liability. Google is an ad company that happens to make hardware, and views your data as necessary monetisation potential.
-
-
Just in time for the Pixel Watch 2 release ✅
-
Which is made by the same company (Google owns Fitbit), so?
-
That was the point my dude.
-
-
-
Godamnit ! Again I missed out on the data sharing opportunity. My uncle got an apple watch and said that I am missing out on all the cool features. I replied , I dont want anything that connects to internet. He laughed.
-
I was forced into using a Fitbit last year, and I instantly went back to my Samsung Galaxy watch when I got the chance. Samsung Health is annoying on iOS, but at least you don't need to send all your data to Samsung in order to use it
-
Well . . . yeah.
Kids, folks, trusted benefactors - everything's taking your data. Tell it no or don’t buy it.
TheWorld: This thing is amazing! Buy it and give it your data! Me: wtf TheWorld: #1 This thing grosses eleventy billion dollars first quarter! Internet: guyz thing stealz data omg (Repeat)