Skip Navigation

Why, as a male, when emotionally do I only feel accepted by women but not by men?

Edit2: It's a subjective perception I'm talking about. Are you offended? Why?

What's the matter, why can't men deal with me being sensitive and emotional? Is it because they struggle with me reminding them of having, too, emotions?

Edit: Do men think I'm weak when I show emotions? If so, why?? Why do women see it as a sign of strength when men are vulnerable, but men don't seem to get it? Are they/are we dumb??

89 comments
  • Man a lot of people are chalking this up to just the individuals being assholes, but there's absolutely a societal expectation to men being stoic, and that's hard to break for a lot of people, even with their closest friends. Men are taught to be driven, active, leaders. It's what we've been conditioned to by society for thousands of years. There's a growing shift towards men embracing what can be seen as "femininity" in aspects of life, particularly emotionally, but speaking from experience here, it's still hard to open up to my guy friends. And I have good guy friends who absolutely would listen and support me. Hell, they have.

    Toxic masculinity has been brought up here, and kinda shot down, but if you dig deep, that's what a lot of it is. Note that doesn't make these people BAD PEOPLE, they're as much victims of it as you are. There's no correlation between 'strength' and showing emotion. No one, man or woman, is going to look at someone going through it and say 'ah they she'd a tear! Weakling!' Hell, if anything, it takes a lot of strength to be emotionally honest. But that feeling is present as a low-level background noise everywhere. Men don't cry. Get over it you're a man. She dumped you? She wasn't that good anyway bro. Nah man, that shit HURTS. This is what toxic masculinity is. Not toxic MEN but toxic STANDARDS, which are perpetuated by both sides.

  • Obviously, in any discussion about groups as diverse as men/women, it's important to recognize that these are sweeping generalizations and that individuals can vary wildly.

    It's not being "sensitive" or "emotional" that most dudes have trouble with.

    Most women probably don't consider it a sign of strength, either. Not the sensitivity or emotionality.

    In my experience, most men are focused on something that is happening. A sport or activity, a task, whatever. Your sharing is most likely out of rapport and just isn't how they want to interact.

    I have close male friendships that are very emotionally open, and others where it just doesn't feel right.

    In my experience, women are different. Male/female relationships are already complicated and getting into preferences and other dynamics is pointless. It could be anything.

    Assuming you're attractive/confident/wealthy/etc, there would be many women who would comfort you just to keep you in their orbit.

    Assuming you aren't, there are many women who would comfort you out of a sense of maternal care and empathy.

    Assuming you're usually friendly, funny, safe, etc, women broadly seem to be kinder and more interested in interacting in that emotional space.

    Does any of it matter? Probably not. Before insulting all men you know, it might be better to consider that you might just not like to have typical male friends. Just because people don't like doing what you do, it doesn't make them dumb.

  • I don't think it's a man/woman thing. I have been friends with men who were very supportive during such times, and women who saw it as weakness. I've also met a lot of women who are turned off by romantic gestures and sentimental feelings coming from men. And of course, I've encountered many that were the reverse of these.

    So I honestly don't think gender is a factor here. I think it varies a lot from person to person regardless of gender. It also highly depends on your relationship with that person. Don't expect a lot of support or empathy from your most casual friends. Some friends will run away from you at the first sign of anything remotely 'clingy'.

    • It also highly depends on your relationship with that person. Don't expect a lot of support or empathy from your most casual friends. Some friends will run away from you at the first sign of anything remotely 'clingy'.

      This is almost certainly part of it. Reality is, most people will only have one or two friendships that are developed enough to be even close to totally vulnerable with. Most people have between 3 to 5 close friends, without much regard for gender.

      In the age of social media, friendships seem diluted to me. The vast majority of people you meet, if you come out and dump the mess of your life on them… they’re gonna back away.

      It isn’t that they’re unempathetic, either. Maintaining that kind of intimate friendship requires a lot of effort and intentionality; people are going to take a step back because they just don’t have the energy to deal with it and the relationship lacks the frame work of trust and mutual understanding to do more than “gee that sucks. Uhm. Good luck with that.”

      That said, it is entirely possible that the culture one finds oneself in has dictated all the things that are being said elsewhere here. For a common example, religious congregations that hew to conservative/traditional relationships.

      • In the age of social media, friendships seem diluted to me.

        I agree. People have always been selfish and self-absorbed to varying degrees. But social media acts as an amplifier of that, from what I've seen.

        It isn’t that they’re unempathetic, either.

        Thanks for pointing this out (and your other good points). It's not reasonable to expect just any random person you know to be a shoulder to cry on.

        Unfortunately, I think our modern "pace of life" here in 2023 has diminished the number and quality of those deeper friendships. I think back to my parents in the 70s and 80s, and how they had close friends that they would spend a lot of time talking on the phone with, visiting with in person on a frequent basis, writing letters and postcards to, etc. Much of that would seem completely absurd to a young person today. People are terrified of talking on the phone, and have forgotten how to do anything but conduct robot-like business on the phone (and they resent doing even that).

  • In my experience, this isn't a gendered distinction - but rather just down to the individual person.

    Some of my closest friends that are both men and women alike are friends I consider "letting my guard down" around. The same applies in the opposite direction, where I have friends (but generally more on the distant friend / acquaintance side) men and women alike that I have to be a bit more guarded around.

    And while I can't comment on this specifically because I of course don't know you and as such have no frame of reference, from what I've experienced in the past and seen others go through, is that a lot of times it's how you bring it up. If it seems more forceful, it's going to have a higher chance to not land well with people (of any gender).

  • A lot of my male relationships, we bond while we do things. My female relationships we can just hang out. Don't know why that is.

  • Yes, I think so. It’s been my experience that when you show a vulnerability or do something that causes people to confront a hidden little part of themselves, people who can’t deal with their repressed emotions around that thing tend to get resentful and sometimes react in really immature ways. Internally, they might think things like “You’re CRYING? But I don’t feel like I get to cry! I never get a chance to show my emotions! Why should YOU?” And then externally, what comes out of their mouth is wild shit like “pull yourself together” or “man up”. This also happens with other modes of self expression but I think in terms of emotion and masculinity it is particularly awful. Women are more likely to have experienced the harmful effects of strict gender roles, and generally want to make sure men feel supported in the face of that, because it (patriarchy) hurts us all.

    Women are also often socialized to know how to react and how to help when people get upset, which can lead to some bleakly unfair family situations, but in contrast to men who might not have that skill set or that lifetime of practice with those types of social situations, they’re going to respond very differently. It is absolutely a skill to be able to cope with others’ feelings, and that skill is not taught to children evenly.

  • I think one take might be that the cause might be based out of a fear of being perceived as being gay. I mean you have generations of men who faced everything from hanging, to chemical castration to prison sentences for being gay. Policing expression of things like any sign of physical signs of affection or "womanly" displays of emotional connection put men in physical danger. That generational trauma of emotional amputation for preservation of life doesn't go away in a day.

    Internally a lot of guys still have their guards up because that was the model of behaviour their fathers and male community members have because their Dads were like that so even if the underlying cause isn't known the behaviour seems more "normal". It's what the people you saw as grown ups did and what they trained you to emulate to be like them. Under those circumstances everything else becomes the deviation because it feels counter to what you were taught or are mirroring. Fighting that feeling of oddness requires an act of conscious will. A lot of people still look at being gay or femme is a failure state. A weakness of moral character... because it is a rejection of internalized homophobia and misogyny and rejecting the notion that these things are deviant is seen as an endorsement. Compulsory straightness was and is a pretty facist system and all facist systems require a "failure state" to demonize. You don't want to be the target of violence so you enact the violence asked of you to prove you aren't one of the failures.

    These systems self perpetuate by default.

  • Could you give more specific examples? I don't deny your experience, it's a bit difficult to try and understand without additional context. Without it, I and other commenters are probably shooting in the dark. The explanations we give might be too general to be useful or satisfactory, or too specific wherein they miss the mark completely for you.

  • Men will see a potential in gaining something by being adversaries. Even if it's a worse outcome by any stretch of the imagination they mightn't be able to overcome evolved and taught practices of harm.

    Many men have to be disarmed before they can get out of predator mode. And high functioning narcissists, psychopaths, ... - dark triad types will only pretend to come out.

    It's the difference between your average agreeable person and a highly driven academic. You're probably going to notice shades of ego with the university educated person. The higher the school status the more likely pretensiousness comes into play during interactions. Everything starts to toxify into a contest of intellect and qualifications.

    Men have similar prevailing toxicity. So, creating a road block over excessive emotional output is an attempt at a 'gotcha'. They're attempting to demarcate/mark their territory at the expense of the emotional person.

89 comments