Whats a band/artist who's music all sounds the same?
Whats a band/artist who's music all sounds the same?
Whats a band/artist who's music all sounds the same?
AC/DC and CCR come to mind. Doesn’t bother me though. It’s the audio equivalent to eating a bag of Doritos. The flavor doesn’t change, but every now and then there’s one with a little more powder on it.
and just like Doritos, every once in a while you gorge on a bunch of doritos until you get totally sick of them and swear you don't like them any more. A month goes by and you start snacking on them again because you hopelessly like them.
I am both amazed and disappointed it’s taken this long for me to learn how to sing AC/DC. It was Marge all along.
Hard disagree about CCR.
every band that i don’t like
This is the answer.
AC/DC for sure. Every song has the same vibe. It's a good vibe, but once you've heard one song, you've heard them all.
...is it going to be controversial if I also say The Beatles? Maybe not ALL of their music, but most.
I appreciate Angus Young's self-awareness.
"I'm sick and tired of people saying that we put out 11 albums that sound exactly the same. In fact, we’ve put out 12 albums that sound exactly the same."
haha strong "no one beats Vitas Gerulaitis 17 times in a row” vibes
It is very controversial to say that of the Beatles. Once they stopped doing live shows they reinvented themselves.
Pre 1964 Beatles I will give you. After, say, Revolver? I don’t see how you could compare Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds to Tomorrow Never Knows to Martha My Dear to Back in the USSR to Sun King, etc etc etc
Often you can tell it’s the same band, but these are meaningfully different sonic experiences.
Say what you will about AC/DC, nobody else can convey the idea of sweaty testicles in musical form as effectively as they do.
AC/DC music is nothing more than 4 chords and a beat.
And you know, sometimes that's all you need.
And we like it like that.
The Beatles did evolve over time. Their early stuff all sounds the same and their late stuff all sounds the same, but there's a big difference between their boy band phase and their stoner phase.
I guess I'm just associating them with their "boy band" phase then. Most of my Beatles listening was probably from the collection of hits on the 1 album back in the late 90s or early 2000s, whenever that came out.
AC/DC especially has the same drum rythm for all songs.
I feel like there was at least some variety during the Bon Scott era but yeah everything from Back in Black on is the same.
Fyi Bon Scot suggested Brian Johnson replace him if he died early.
Check out Geordie if you want to see what he was doing before joining AC/DC.... Is different.
Whole lotta Rosie is on my husband's workout playlist and it is a jam. So good.
Live off the If You Want Blood album is the best version! Hype
Oh yeah that's definitely a top ac/dc song
The Beatles is like 4 bands wearing a trenchcoat, so I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. I wouldn't even say any individual album is samey from at least sgt peppers on
Nickelback
Multiple bands are just more Nickleback
Breaking Benjamin
they went disco for a little bit
Imagine Dragons. I don't know a lot of their songs but when I hear them I can guess it's them with pretty good accuracy.
I'd say Thunder sounds somewhat different from their other music, and I don't enjoy it at all.
That song is abhorrent. I can’t believe people listen to that shit and don’t turn it off.
sabaton. I still love it though
Sabaton is on my go-to playlist whenever I play Valheim.
The Ramones.
If it’s been a while, I’ll listen to 5 tracks and be like “Yes, The Ramones!!!”
Then after a couple of tracks more I suddenly really need to put on something else.
God The Ramones are such a weak band. I've never understood people's fanaticism.
They were reactionary, trying to destroy the pompousness of 70s stadium and prog rock. Fast and simple the way rock and roll began.
That's how I feel about Michael Jackson. Except he wasn't a band. He was just 1 person who whispered like a shy little girl & flailed around onstage like a noodle and he kept grabbing his crotch and nobody asked him to grab his crotch. I've never understood people's fanaticism.
I saw them live twice and they were great shows.
Maybe they're sedated?
Tool
Oof. That's a tough one. Every song on an album sounds pretty similar, but I feel like each album has a very distinct style from the others.
I get told this a lot. Sure, the range of guitar effects is limited if not non-existant, but fortunately they create a sound I like so... I'm glad they all sound the same? I guess.
I think though with Tool the changes are a lot more subtle than people expect, which makes them bad background music. The timing changes, and beats appearing and disappearing every second bar are not so noticeable unless you're really listening to it.
Having been surprised to see Tool twice in this thread, I think you hit the nail on the head.
Between Maynard's voice, and the basslines OP mentioned, they definitely have a distinctive sound, and I could see how it could blur together as background / casual listening music. Especially if you listen to mostly mixes ot playlists.
Personally, I almost exclusively listen to music by album, and I think thats where Tool's songs really become more distinct from each other.
(Beginning song with bass) bun da dun dun dun dun x20
I love Tool but you're right. Yeah they're pulling all sorts of unexplored timing signatures out of their ass, so each song is technically unique in that respect, but the vibe is fairly consistently dark and meditative. There's some exceptions though, I think The Pot really stands out from the rest of their stuff.
Surprised no one's mentioned U2
First that came to mind. Can’t stand them. Just boring.
As much as I dislike them, their music has evolved. Their 80s stuff sounds different than their 90s stuff. However, after 'Achung baby', they have not made any interesting music whatsoever. To be honest, 'Achtung baby' did not stand the test of time for me either.
The Doors
"The same" always means "these aspects I'm noticing" and not these other aspects I'm not noticing. And when there are aspects I'm not used to they tend to stand out and eclipse the aspects i'm used to and take for granted. Whole genres that i never listen to "sound the same."
Wesley Willis
Don't change perfection
I still get The Vultures Ate My Dead Ass Up stuck in my head.
"look at this photograph"
Can't even be bothered to name them, they suck so fucking hard
You fuck. Now I have this fucking shit song stuck in my head!
Sorry about my rage ...
Forgive me
Creed
Offspring.
And that's why we like it.
Idk, I feel like their first few albums sounded pretty different to the ones that came later.
100% Breaking Benjamin. Every album sounds just like the last one.
Having said that, I was a big fan of them and still enjoy their music.
Most EDM in 2010’s. That’s the obvious answer.
Jack Johnson. If you hear one of his songs in public just say “oh, Banana Pancakes” and move on with your life. Not a soul on earth will be able to correct you
I feel like it kinda works for him. It's very mellow acoustic folkish music you could just have going on in the background.
For sure, I wouldn’t say it’s unpleasant.
Andrew WK had some good tunes, but they all sound the same.
Ozfest 2001 was one of the first concerts I went to, right as AWK started his brief rise. Absolute blast to see live, the music was still fresh at that point. And the guy is just a goofball, total respect for him and his act. But you're also 100% correct. You know what you're getting with them. Early 2000s, they were on every bill, they played constantly.
Linkin Park.
Look, I like them, so I'm not exactly knocking them, but a long time ago I was working an overnight inventory shift, and my manager at the time put on a Linkin Park album, and I predict how every song was going to go because they all seemed like the same song.
This was true up until Minutes to Midnight came out. They're a lot more versatile these days. I really like their new singer.
She's alright, but she needs a few more albums with her voice on them, she doesn't sound that great singing Chester's songs. At least at the Vancouver show. Still very enjoyable but her own songs are where she shines. That's probably not surprising to anyone though
Really surprised no one's mentioned Everclear, but that might just be because no one thinks about Everclear that much
Volbeat Disturbed
I think that is true for the vast majority of bands. What some band manage to do is reinvent their sound with different albums and often that is not well received by the fans.
Yeah, I think it's very difficult for bands to reinvent themselves, and the majority who try lose fans because of it. The two bands who always spring to kind for me are Radiohead and Brand New, whose discographies are a bit of a roller coaster genre-wise, the former much more so.
Coldplay springs to mind. The Coldplay who released Moon Music last year is an entirely different band to the one who released Parachutes in 2000. I know of few other bands who've gone through such an enormous transformation. And while the newer stuff may not resonate with me the way the early stuff did, it's fair to say that it's worked for them.
That’s most bands, isn’t it? That’s why we have favorites, because we like how they sound. I mean, I suppose there’s people who like a particular band because of their technical skill in general, but for most people isn’t it the particular sound they have that draws us in?
To some degree you are correct, however there is a massive difference between a band like AC/DC which had jokingly been said they have have the same album for 40 years, and say Metallica.
Metallica helped define what Thrash Metal is. But listening to Load/Reload vs Ride the Lightning is a huge difference in sound.
And you take it forward another 10 years from Reload the sound has changed all over again.
Very different from AC/DC but then again most bands/artists don't have 50 year careers as the biggest name in their musical setting
I'm stll pissed off about Load, tbh
Status Quo ( the clue is in the name)
AND YET, Pictures of Matchstick Men is a psych masterpiece.
Aerosmith.
I love them but Boston.
Bon Jovi. Apparently they're not a one hit wonder.
U2? Never listened to them besides sometimes on the radio. But seems kinda samey
Their radio singles are same sounding, but they have some very different sounding songs that don't get played.
I was just listening to them for the first time in a long while last week. There's a noticeably difference pre and post elevation album.
Cocomelon.
To some degree, Goatremoved. Love the band, and this isn't necessarily a bad thing. I can never remember song titles of theirs, because they are all a bit OTT tbh.
Haha, agree on that one. I'mma be a lil spicy and say Tankard if we're to stay in the thrash metal genre lol.
Yeah I can't deny that.
Tiger Army can release 10,000 songs that sound exactly like In The Orchard and I'll gladly buy em all 😆
I like most of those bands. Never heard of Tiger Army, but now I’m curious.
After Bad Guy, i couldn't tell the difference between Billie Eillish songs.
That's absolutely wild, her music is all over the place. None of the singles on her new album sounded anything alike lol
I may not have heard any of her latest stuff.
I'm not a huge Eilish fan, but "when the party's over" is excellent and very different from everything else I've heard from her.
Metallica
Oh yes. They have certainly lost their touch.
Also Rammstein or Til Lindemann's solo work (which is just Rammstein with less effort).
Another one is Limp Bizkit. The music has not evolved, even with the new singer.
Bring in the downvotes.
Lol, there is no new singer
Rammstein's first three albums were full of bangers. But, I have no idea what they've been doing in the past twenty years or so.
As a teenage metalhead of the 90s, little has distressed me more than literally everything Metallica have released since St Anger.
I really, really dug Load and ReLoad. They were different to what had come before, but they still had a hard rock edge to them that I loved. Then Jason quit, and The Corporation Of James And Lars hired the formely mighty Rob Trujillo and set about their plan to record the same indistinguishable wall of noise over and over again until people stopped bothering to even pirate their music.
Deftones (sorry)
I disagree on that one. If you listen to Adrenaline and then skip forward to Private music there's barely any resemblance left.
I will agree though that their overall vibe has remained consistent, but I think that speaks to their vision of the band instead of a lack of creativity.
It’s funny, I listened to Adrenaline first, decided it wasn’t for me and forgot about Deftones for a couple years. Finally listened to Saturday Night Wrist and loved it and literally every other Deftones album after that.
The differences in albums has been more subtle, but I thought what they did with Pink Cellphone and the instrumental only Konami Code were unique to their music.
Gore is very stylistically different
You have to make a distinction between bands that have a (more or less) coherent sound and style, and blatant repetition. Anyway, if anyone tries to tell me that Volbeat isn't just rereleasing the same song for the whole time they existed, I have to assume that one of us must be demented.
Chuck Berry
Also his cousin, Marvin Berry.
The songs themselves sound a little differnt but if you asked me to identify an evanescence song only by the singer, I'd be unable to differentiate any of them. I know this isn't true but sometimes it sounds to me like shes just singing the same note the whole song.
I love evanescence, but tbh their indie stuff is a LOT better than their new stuff, with the exception of fallen. Fallen was peak evanescence. Al their new stuff is mid if that
Reading the comments, it sounds like it’s a bad thing for a band to stick to their sound. I actually think that’s good. After all, I started listening to a band because of their sound. When they suddenly reinvent themselves, they usually lose me.
Positive example: Interpol. In my opinion, the band got better over time but kept the exact same sound.
Negative example: Radiohead. At some point, Thom Yorke just started letting cats walk across synthesizers.
Translated by a machine. Spelling errors are subject to the copyright of “Google Gemini”.
I guess you stopped listening to Radiohead after Kid A? Really, really bad take.
Mamaleek change up the sound on every album, and still have their defining mood and are different from everyone else. If I want the different Mamaleek sounds, I listen to the different albums.
About the same with King Crimson, I think, but with longer series of albums.
Vivaldi
Bad Religion
YOOOOOOOO sorry but this is my all time favorite band and Ive gotta stick up for them. They have an unmistakable signature sound, yes, but not every song sounds the same like AC/DC par examplé as other people have rightly cited.
If you'd kindly take 2 mins to listen to a bit of the following songs I pulled off the top of my head and are still willing to say all their songs sound the same then I dont know what to say:
Here's the standard kinda song you're probably thinking about, You off of No Control:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v1PgiBpTtao
Then put on Struck a Nerve from Recipe for Hate:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vY-EXZkXWYA
Then Television from Stranger than Fiction:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-8hlEAJZdM
Then Turn Your Back on Me from Dissent of Man:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0Pqt38l_qTk
Then Faces of Grief from Age of Unreason:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xpO7S29SgxQ
Thanks. For extra credit, they also had an album they kind of would everyone to forget about that was leaning into a kind of proggy sound, closer to The Who than their own sound if you want something thats way off in the wilderness:
Fuckin receipts brought up in here
I think I know what it is now. It's the vocal melodies. It might be certain intervals and scales that he reuses over and over again.
Thanks for the suggestions. The songs you posted kind of back my claim. Don't get me wrong, I like individual songs like 21st Century Digital Boy, Punkrock Song or No Control. But when it comes to listening to a whole album it's too much of the same for me.
But "Into the Unknown" is crazy. I didn't know they had an album that sounded completely different and each song is different. They seem to hide it well, it's not on Qobuz, Deezer nor Spotify. I found a podcast about it, listening to it now.
Oh dang! I also came in here to say Bad Religion, and I would have been wrong. Thank you for bringing sources.
10cc and maroon5.
Both equally boring as well
Nickelback Taylor Swift
Metallica.
I remember one night working a job replacing checkout lanes at Savemart one of the other dudes doing the job setup the PA system to play nothing but Metallica songs and at our first break I asked if he could stop playing the same song on repeat and then showed me he had 6 whole CDs in the thing and it was on shuffle.
So then I asked to add other bands to the mix.
But I mean... There's like 12 different parts to "Unforgiven." Which is basically just 1 song.
Metallica's fandom has fractured every single album release after Ride the Lightning. My best friend in high school and I almost threw hands over the Black album and it's because that was the one we agreed on
You are so wrong
Slayer
Powerwolf, and that's a compliment. They're consistent; you boot up an album from them, and you know you're about to listen to 40 minutes of horny werewolf crusaders.
Green Day took a short hiatus from their usual sound for American Idiot and 21st Century Breakdown, but otherwise has been releasing the same sound as their original works since after 2009, just now overly produced.
Alan Walker
The dude has just seen one tune go viral and decided "why not make ALL of my music exactly like this?"
Basshunter albums from the 2000s
Ink Spots, but in a comfy way. I guess it was kind of their intentional gimmick, so this might not be a good answer.
I used to love The Black Keys, but all their latest albums just sound so samey