60 Minutes Removes Trump’s Threat to ‘Walk Away’ from Interview During Corruption Questioning
Trump threatened to leave his interview with 60 Minutes' Norah O'Donnell, which was not only omitted from broadcast, but also the extended version release.
O’DONNELL: So not concerned about the appearance of corruption with this?
TRUMP: I can’t say, because — I can’t say — I’m not concerned. I don’t — I’d rather not have you ask the question.
Corrupt piece of shit.
Has he ever been able to answer a difficult critical question? Like EVER?
CBS is also a POS in this. They should have aired it.
They were bought and paid for. No shit they won't air it
Each time he's asked an even remotely difficult question he just calls the reporter names and refuses to answer.
Why wouldn't he continue to do what works?
Nupe, and if it's a woman, he also gets to insult her intelligence in addition to her fake news employer. He's such a coward and laughing stock.
Sounds like the Democrats should sue CBS for cutting Trump's kiddie tantrum.
seriously I still can't phantom that guy is America's president whaaatttttt theeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee error404 In America it doesnt matter who or what u are u can still become president, pedo nazi? YOU CAN BECOME PRESIDENT TWICE!!!! And yall call yourself a democracy xD corrupt to the bone. Go strike or smthing
Didn't they get sued (by trump) and settle over doing this with the Harris interview? Can't the precedent be used against them for doing it again to win another lawsuit against them very easily? Or couldn't they use that precedent against trump to force the full interview as well?
I don't know much about US law but this seems very legally sketchy to me. I guess kissing ass takes over the law in these cases.
In social contract theory, we are moving from the rule of law to the arbitrary rule of a noxious beast.
This is how newsome should spend his money, suing CBS because of the cut interview.
No, because the settlement was a bribe, not a decision that CBS made because they were concerned about losing the lawsuit. The owners were trying to complete a merger that required governmental approval and decided that paying that settlement would be better than getting the merger blocked.
In what way is that quid pro quo illegal?
Trump is the law now.
I don’t know for sure, but I imagine settling out of court, specifically avoids setting a precedent. Which in this case means if they want to run it, they’d not have the precedent to protect them, but also have to choose settling, or paying to fight an overtly partisan court system right up to the supreme court.
They’ve capitulated enough for us to know that was never going to be N option.
No network is going to do more to draw the attention of the administration, than allow late night hosts to make jokes about him, and even that isn’t going to last much longer I expect.
IANAL but my elementary understanding is that, no, a settlement results in no ruling from the court, and therefore no precedent is set.
And then a conservative company bought Paramount. They can't call him out anymore.
Isn't CBS owned by Larry Ellison, run by Bari Weiss?
It should be boycotted.
MSM is a total joke at this point.
60 Minutes has become pussy lapdogs.
Those Nazis are murdering innocent Americans without due process. How can that be? Why isn’t anyone standing up, helping, resisting, even throwing paint or helping people escape? Dress up in MAGA clothing to cover urself up lmao meanwhile slash their tires while they're not looking. And those so-called “peaceful” protests? Your own president literally said he “shits on you” it’s all over that video and still people think peaceful protests will fix anything? America honestly makes me physically sick right now. Wake up. Go on strike, build strike funds, take real action. And please, keep that Nazi nonsense far away from Europe.
Can yall not ask taylor swift to set up something or billie eilish like... force them all to care