Skip Navigation

Should we switch the default privacy community from !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com to !privacy@programming.dev ?

Hello everyone,

I raised the point recently already, but to make it short

I tried to reach out to the active poster, who posted to the lemmy.dbzer0 community in the past before switching back to programming.dev, and I guess they disagree with some of the stances of dbzer0 (probably the pro AI one)

Programming.dev has a few hiccups from time to time, but for a few months it has been stable

What do people think?

39 comments
  • You know what, sure. Just take the reins, I'm not able to do so. :)

    I think I was a bit reactionary since I'm a dbzer0 admin and her reasoning is flawed, but I guess if it works, it's fine. Have a good day!

    • Thanks!

      Well, now I have to convince @cm0002@lemmy.world to switch too, that might be another task altogether x)

      • Np. Honestly I'm a bit relieved since I haven't been feeling with my communities at all :( pretty burnt out for months straight lol

        Hopefully y'all find success in the new comm

      • Lol I'll go wherever the flow is going, though iirc the MAU deficit was more than half between the 2, so that might be an uphill battle

        But yea, if you feel this is the best move, I'll redirect

        Though, I will say, I find this beef with AI-gen'd stuff rather silly, people should shit on proprietary profit-driven AI companies and support open source AI

  • Not an active poster, but when I do post in privacy community it's !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com simply because programming.dev is loose with defederation. While I don't agree with certain instances political ideology something like privacy communities reach being limited because of it makes no sense.

    I'll echo what others have said though that this will get resolved with multi-community support which was funded by NLnet grant. While consolidating now might seem like a good idea to help community growth, I think it's more damaging longer term than waiting for technical solution.

39 comments