Some of y'all are not ready to hear this...

That's the point, I've noticed a lot of the loudest, most active posters on Lemmy ultimately want one thing, which is progressives not to vote. Weird how that's what the conservatives have relied on for every presidential victory they've achieved in the past half century or more.

Votes are earned not freely given. Your vote is your voice. Definitely vote at the local and state levels where your voice can be the loudest.
- don't worry bout dat
- And if you only want to give half a vote, give it to Trump and JD.
  (Because not voting is very similar to half a vote for the other guy.)
  
  (Because not voting is very similar to half a vote for the other guy.)
  Not voting wasn't a vote for Trump. Did not voting for Trump mean a vote for Harris?
  
  It was.
  
  Did not voting for Trump mean a vote for Harris?
  It would mean you wouldn't have minded a Harris victory. The comment even explicitly said "half a vote" to reflect this.
  This commentary is frequently also accompanied with blaming Harris voters for things that Trump is doing...
- First off, it's four years, get your math right. Secondly, we only bomb browns, we just sell the bombs to anyone wanting to bomb whites. "Foreigner" and "non-foreigner" really have nothing to do with it. I think mainly we just feel really secluded over here and we don't want to be left out of all the cool Europe and Asia and Africa happenings, this is just the only way we can express ourselves.

What is the point of this meme?

These memes communicate to Democrats and their supporters that we're sick and tired of their mask-off conservative rule when they promise us the world and do nothing once elected. You want praise? You want votes? Then do something.

Since, you know, not voting for them apparently isn't enough to inspire meaningful change. Just once in my life I want to see Democrats fight harder for the working class and poor as they do against socialists and third parties.

You want praise? You want votes? Then do something.
Time for you to educate yourself. Look up Dem's economic stats compared to Republicans. Look up the Dem's voting history.
They aren't doing EVERYTHING, but they do a lot more than the other viable option.
If you want them to do more, then stop wasting your time doing what you're doing and start focusing on getting people to primary Dems who aren't doing what we want, because that's how you get Democrat party reform.
This meme is utter trash and only serves to fracture liberals and prevent the reform I just described.
Just once I want liberals to come together and primary bad Dems to send a message instead of fucking whining and not voting or voting 3rd party so fascists can take over.
- Just once I want liberals to come together and primary bad Dems
  They did.
  That bad candidate was Joe Biden.
  The Democratic Party just ignored it. Democratic primaries are a worthless exercise.
  
  Joe Biden was not primaried.
  
  Yes he was.
  Read the link I embedded there. Also, there was Marianne Williamson.
  Not that it would have mattered, as Democrats rig their primaries anyway.

That's exactly it. This is the meme and attitude of tankies that are chomping at the bit for violence and doing everything they can to help push the country to the Right. This is because of their faith-based belief that it will magically create class consciousness and a revolution to overthrow the global bourgeoisie. They don't give two shits about the LGBTQ+, POC, medically vulnerable, etc people that they have to sacrifice in the process.

You are correct. The OP has an agenda and that agenda is to fracture liberals.

The answer is not to give up. The answer is not to vote for a worthless 3rd party with zero chance of winning. The answer is to reform the Democrat party and history has shown us, repeatedly, that it is completely possible. And it literally just happened with the Republican party in the last 2 decades.

Tankies. Do not engage.

Smart. Having one's echo chamber and worldview contested can be terribly inconvenient.

You should not attempt to reform something which is not reformable. Instead start something new.

In general, you should not reform. Revolution is the way forward.

You should not attempt to reform something which is not reformable.
Pick up a fucking history book.
Political party reform is entirely possible and has happened repeatedly in American history. Conservative voters just did it to the Republican party.
Scrapping an established party with national sway for a 3rd party with NO clout and NO representatives in the House or Senate is fucking stupid. Especially when we have a national party in power currently attempting to dismantle our federal government to replace with an authoritarian one.
Revolution is the way forward.
Then do it. Big talk on the internet. If you think modern Americans are going to start a revolution, think again.
Easy to say from your parents basement.
- Instead of projection, try self-reflection.
  
  We need to capture the dems and turn them into a socialist party, just like the fascists captured the reps and turned them into a anti-worker. I spent way too long in the army to have the illusion that the american people are capable of changing anything through other means. It will not happen.
  Not to be ignorant but I highly doubt you have the training, funding, or even the intestinal fortitude to do any of the things a revolution would entail. I also think that if you did find the courage it wouldn't matter because when they drop a non-explosive shredder warhead through your window it's all over. You have no idea what your asking people to do when there is a better way.
  
  This reform is simply not possible. You cannot use the same methods as the far right and expect the same result but for a different ideology. They work differently, they're based on different systems and beliefs.
  And you seriously underestimate the power of revolutionary warfare. Technological advances in military warfare have made things harder, but not impossible. In 93 Russians were in the streets fighting the Russian military to overthrow Yeltsin. They had the courage, even without the military training. On Vietnam a nation and it's people successfully defended their freedom against a technologically superior army. And I don't think I need to list how many coups and revolutions have appeared over the past 100 years. You can't think it's impossible looking at history.
  I am no billionaire able to fund a milita, nor am I a general. But when the time arises or rather if it arises while I live, I do have the zeal to kill and die for what I believe in.
  
  No, as I said I was in the military for almost a decade. I promise you I'm way more versed in the art of turning people into fertilizer than you ever will be. 1993 was 30 some years ago. The techg for killing people has improved drastically. You have no idea how many ways the US has to kill you. I saw things in 2005 that would still blow your mind.
  
  Technological advances do not change societal upheaval.
  Revolutions don't fight the military in symmetrical warfare.
  Militaries can defect, they can be sabotaged, their bases besieged, their supply lines disrupted, their forces stretched too thin, etc.
  In ideal circumstances no revolution would have to fight one united military. Parts would defect or declare neutrality. Those who fight have finite supply and finances. What will a soldier do when he runs out of bullets and more importantly rations?
  But in the absolute worst case, it will either lead to a more bloody victory or the military would have to literally depopulate the country with lethal force to establish their rule.
  Also the 90s are not so far from your 2005. The majority of the military equipment Russia uses today in Ukraine is the same as during the Black October in 93.
  
  Look, I literally don't care what you think. I spent a quarter of my life working for the army. You clearly don't have a very strong grasp on what your asking people to do.
  "In ideal circumstances no revolution would have to fight one united military. Parts would defect or declare neutrality. Those who fight have finite supply and finances. What will a soldier do when he runs out of bullets and more importantly rations?" -- This one is the real kicker. We bring ice cream trailers and fast food restaraunts to combat zones and you think the military is going to run out of basic rations. L-O-fucking-L
  Also what do Russia and Ukraine have to do with us fighting your hypothetical revolution?
  
  If you do not care, why share your shit opinion anyway?
  You seem to have no idea what actual war or revolutions are like if you think you'll have ice cream trucks drive up to you after bombing a city into the ground. Plundering a foreign country and getting food from home and fighting a civil war that disrupts if not outright destroys the economic base of the country that supplies your army are completely different things. I'm sure your Navy seal ass with over 300 confirmed kills would know that.
  Also what do Russia and Ukraine have to do with us fighting your hypothetical revolution?
  Because those see quite literally 90% the same military equipment. During the uprising and during the war now. If you can't see how that matters, then I don't know what to tell you.
  But I'm sure Mr. Crayon eater here knows better than the military leaders of actually successful revolutions of the past.
  
  Fist of all I was a medic. Secondly your dumb ass literally can't grasp how outclassed you tankies are. Your fucking removed if you think your "revolution" has a chance.
  I specifically don't care about YOUR opinion because its wrong. Maybe try a suicide vest. That worked out so well for the iraqis.
  
  What steps have you taken to start the New American Revolution, champ?

China produces ~65% of global smartphones. At worst US companies simply re-brand products from overseas OEMs, at best they're using Chinese produced semiconductors and components to create original products.
The rest of the consumer electronics market is pretty similar. If you believe modern China is communist then they are "doom-scrolling on their communist-produced smartphones" through a communist produced network infrastructure which you are, most likely, reading through a communist-produced screen.
I would argue however that modern China largely split the difference between the USSR, which you are McCarthy-ing about, and the modern Russian Federation, which explicitly reformed into a liberal democracy with a capitalist market economy.
- Let me simplify: iPhones are built and designed by, what you consider, Communists.
  Android is capitalism appropriating the largely anarchist project of Linux. Which if capitalists had their way would've been strangled in its cradle.
  
  Aaaaand, you have no arguments to the contrary...
  
  Per my previous comment, reality disagrees with you.