Banned for arguing that harm reduction is not morally optional; this made me a 'turbolib', despite breaking none of the comm's actual rules
Liberalism is when you believe in voting against fascism to lessen the burdens on engaging in actual leftist action, I guess.
Extremely dire turbolib statement here, RIP
You're viewing a single thread.
YDI.
Don't go into subs that you don't agree with, just to argue or try to prove someone wrong, and then get mad when you get kicked out for it.
Read the room, friend.
Wanna bet if you did the same, .world would want you banned again?
I'm not sure what you mean. I never posted stuff to .world to just stir up trouble. When I was still on .world, it was before the election. And Lemmy was a much different place right before the election; as in even more extreme and pro-censorship.
I was hated on .world c/politics (and most of Lemmy) because I advocated for third party, and was vocal that I was gonna vote third party. I was a proud supporter of the socialist party, and that's the way I voted.
My posts are still there, and can be seen by anyone. The reason I got banned is because I double-posted (accidentally) an article from newsweek that said that Trump was rising in the polls. The post that got me banned is still there. Anyone can see it.
Lemmy was pissed at anyone who posted anything about Trump rising in the polls. .worlders all said it wasn't true, Newsweek was russian propaganda (!), I was a russian accepting money to post, I'd disappear after the election, etc. Boom! Then ban hammer.
Well, turns out that Trump WAS rising in the polls. He DID win the election. And I DID vote socialist party. And I'm STILL on Lemmy.
So I was correct about every single thing I posted on .world. And I stand by all my posts, and I'm glad they are still there. And now Lemmy isn't as opposed to third parties, now that they see all the nonsense that happened with duopoly's.
Also, I STILL support socialist party, and still post socialist links. And .world (and most of Lemmy) still hates me. lmao
Oh I know, you were in good faith and got banned. PJ is dishonest and enters spaces where he's intentionally stirring up shit and then whines when he gets banned.
Ahhh, ok, sorry for my overly long explanation then. I wasn't sure what you were implying. And yes, I agree, PJ likes to stir up drama.
Thank you, friend!
Nah it is good you wrote it out, we need this kind of simple vulnerability to combat the downright terrifying delusions people spout in the form of easy reactionary narratives that flatten reality into someone to point a finger at.