dd: disk destroyer
dd: disk destroyer
dd: disk destroyer
You're viewing a single thread.
Commands like dd
are the best. Good ole greybeard-era spells with arcane syntax and the power to casually wipe out the whole universe (from their perspective ofc) if used haphazardly or not in respectful manner.
What do you mean? Explicitly having to set if=
and of=
is way harder to screw up than mixing up the order of arguments for e.g. cp
.
I could swear the argument order to "ln" swaps every now and then!
Unless you forget what if and of mean. With cp
it's simply "cp what where". Never had problems remembering that.
is it really hard to remember infile and outfile?
No, but you're just typing if and of, not infile and outfile, and the letters are right next to each other on a qwerty kbd. One can haphazardly misuse a lot of commands, it's just that some commands may lead to nastier outcomes than others.
I never had any problems with cp
either. But the post makes it seem like dd
is somehow more error prone, which makes no sense to me
Well, usually dd is not used as often as cp, so there's a bigger chance of messing up the parameters, unless you're careful and rtfm first.
Computer equivalent of vacuum decay in our universe...