More wisdom from Supply Side Jesus

yeah remember when Jesus said "if I were to feed you, it would disincentivize you from finding a job and just enable your laziness. Use your god-given talents to feed yourself you moocher" and then gave all the fish and bread to the rich?

No.
Use your god-given talents to feed yourself you moocher" and then gave all the fish and bread to the rich?
That's literally what the Parable of the Talents is about. Matthew 25:14-30 if you are having trouble finding it.
- Wow this Jesus guy is starting to sound like kind of a dick
  In all seriousness, respect for showing up with the receipts. I don’t put much stock in the book myself, but I learned a bit more about it today.
- It's almost like I worded the end exactly like that because I know that's LiTeRaLlY what it says you utter cabbage. I was just parodying your Supply Side Jesus concept further; it's not like that was the central message that Jesus had, except in conservative readings of course
  
  Supply Side Jesus isn't MY concept, in fact, it was Al Franken (yes, the senator) who came up with it.
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies_and_the_Lying_Liars_Who_Tell_Them
  https://www.beliefnet.com/news/2003/09/the-gospel-of-supply-side-jesus.aspx
  Now Franken of course is a Jew, so it's easy to see why he might have a bone to pick with Christianity.
  
  Supply Side Jesus isn’t MY concept, in fact, it was Al Franken (yes, the senator) who came up with it.
  No shit? And yes, that was sarcasm – just so you don't take that literally as well.
  Now Franken of course is a Jew, so it’s easy to see why he might have a bone to pick with Christianity.
  That's certainly a take.
  
  That's certainly a take.
  I mean, I hope I'm not saying anything too controversial here, but I think it's pretty well understood that one of the major theological differences between Christians and Jews is how they feel about Jesus.
- Matthew 25:14-30
  Are you seriously taking something that is called a "parable" literally? Do you need help in understanding what a parable is? The whole thing is not even about money, but about god (the master) and his stewards who shall work on spreading the gospel while Jesus is gone. Those who spread the word of god shall be rewarded and those who are resentful of god will be punished. It has nothing to do with that capitalist shit people like you interpret into it.
  
  It has not to do with resentment at all
  It is about carrying their responsibilities to his kingdom with diligence
  The talents, a thing of Great value then, represent the mandate to go about preaching and making disciples
  Each of the receivers were expected to carry out their duties using the talents diligently, that is, doing said preaching/ disciples work
  That one who worked against his master interest by hiding that talent, showed bad faith and a bad spirit and is to be a warning on the need to remain diligent in multiplying that talent, basically exhorting them to do "business" with it to increase it (that is, to keep on preaching and making disciples)
  It's not about resentment
  
  Okay, but that's exactly what's happening in the OP's picture, isn't it?
  I mean, without any context we are left to assume what "lack of results" means but if all he did was eat and made no effort to spread the gospel, then he's basically the wicked servant in that parable, no?

That's why 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck! All they have to do is invest the pennies they have left over! Crazy how a group of people that motherfucking huge aren't just pulling themselves up by their bootstraps!

I think the moral of that story is that you should at least make a bare minimum effort in order to justify your existence. The Parable of the Wedding feast has a very similar lean: there, a guy gets thrown out of the wedding (after having been invited for free because the original guests wouldn't come) because he wouldn't even dress up for it.
The point is, there ARE examples of Jesus cutting people off because they're not worth his continued investment in them.
- Correct me if I'm wrong, but your point sounds like, "[The god of my religion] does not find your existence is worth enough to help, therefore, the United States Government is not obligated to change a system where 60% of it's citizens are not financially stable."
  
  Correct me if I'm wrong, but your point sounds like "the God of YOUR religion better not be telling the God of MY religion what to do."
  
  Yes, you are wrong. When it comes to the USA, NO religion should dictate governmental decisions. Whether it is yours or somebody else's.
  
  Right, which implies that the God of your religion is the state, because that’s who you want to give supreme authority to.
  
  ... No? Are you an idiot? Nothing should have supreme authority
  
  How will disputes be settled then?
- What?
  I just want to point out that in the wedding illustration, that guy who gets thrown out it's not because he didn't put an effort dressing
  He was thrown out because he he could not have got inside the building without the wedding garment
  So he shouldn't be there
  That's why they thrown him out
  Because he was not recognized as being one of the invited AND chosen in any of the 3 rounds of invites that went out , the dude had to go.
  The whole deal is basically telling people at the time that each rejected invitation made you part of his enemies, and even then if you tried to pass as if you had been invited and chosen, you'd be found out
  
  Okay but it still roughly fits the situation in the OP, doesn't it? He got thrown out because he wasn't producing the expected result (i.e. being a proper wedding guest).
  
  ~~All guests were given the garment for free.~~
  ~~So maybe he thought his own garment was better than the one provided by the host, which it wasn't.~~
  
  All guests were given the garment for free.
  Where does it say that?
  
  You're right, I must have misremembered that. I totally thought that it was explicitly stated in this parable.
  
  I appreciate your honesty.
  
  I honestly appreciate your appreciation to the other guy's honesty
  
  Nah, it's because he wasn't even supposed to be there. He was not chosen
  
  Okay, then perhaps the guy in the OPs meme wasn't chosen either
  
  Probably, I don't understand the meme at all
  
  The meme is attempting to caricature Conservative’s idea of Jesus by alleging that the biblical Jesus would never put profit over people. But as the parables I mentioned show, that is in fact inaccurate and thus promotes a liberal caricature of Jesus who feeds people endlessly without ever asking for anything in return.

I did, and though we can expect those with a talent to be profitable, what about those with a tenth of one?

Let's put that parable in modern terms. One day a hedge fund manager decided to leave the country for a while to his other home overseas. He went and told His workers to go and be profitable with the money. And so he gave one a million dollars , another 100, 000, and another $50,000.

The one with a million dollars, invested his money and time into making a new business. He managed to turn that $1 million into $2.3 million. The one with 100,000 managed to make $170,000 with shrewd investing. But the man with $50,000 sat on it and didn't do anything. He put it in a savings account and left it there.

The hedge fund manager came back, and saw how successful the other managers were. And he asked the one with 10k "Why didn't you do anything with what I gave you?

The one with the 50 k said "I didn't want to lose any of the money."

The manager rebuked him though because he could have at least taken 1 year bonds and beat interest.

It's a parable about using what God gave you. God gives us gifts to bring in profits. Not in money, as that's not what God really needs, but in faith. You could live for a while with 50k even. But there are people who live paycheck to paycheck who don't have that 1 talent of silver in the first place. They're paid 800 dollars bi-weekly. Rent is 800 dollars. Good luck living with 800 left for everything else. And you still call them lazy

What does Jesus say about people with money? Two things stick out to me. The first one are the Rich donors to the the synagogue, and the poor woman who gives a quarter of her wealth to it. Jesus remarks that the woman gave more than those Rich donors ever will. The other is about a rich man who seeks to enter the kingdom of God and ask Jesus how to do this. Jesus tells him that he must give all his money to the poor. The man was disappointed because he had a lot of wealth.

What boggles my mind as a Christian is that we idolize Rich people and shame poor people. When in fact The most pious people I know, are poor

Prosperity Gospel is a scourge and a poor excuse to claim that God is on the side of the rich.

Thanks for your response, but I don’t think I was promoting prosperity gospel? I understand that this parable is a favorite of theirs, but as you correct pointed out, there’s more to Jesus than that, and the point of the parable is by no means to rag on poor people, but on people who make poor decisions.
My understanding is that if someone has little talent but still makes the most of it, that person is still more welcome in the Kingdom of Heaven than someone who has a lot but makes little use of it. In other words, if it was the servant who received the most money who ended up burying it and making no profit, it would have been him who would be cast out instead. See also the Parable of the Wedding Feast, where everyone receives exactly the same (an invitation to the king’s wedding), but one person shows up without the proper clothes on.
- but on people who make poor decisions.
  What types of poor decisions? Decisions in faith? Family? Finance? Fitness? From the top level comment of the comment thread I read it as finance as that's the thing related to food in the original post. I read this story as our stewardship of things God gives us. (Everything from the work of our hands to our minds to our relationships to wealth) He who is given much should use them and not keep them hidden away for later
  little talent
  Talent refers to money in the literal sense (Or more accurately a weight for metals which could be traded as money) It is a large amount of money.
  The parable of the wedding feast is about people neglecting their faith and still expecting to be a part of the Kingdom of God. It's not about how much money they have, but instead if they actually practice their faith. If you know the scriptures, but say you'll be righteous later, then you're that person who isn't clothed for the feast. We are called to keep our faith and grow faith in others with the gifts that God gives us.
  Supply Side Jesus on the other hand tells us that it's not worth investing our time and resources into people who are poor, and that instead the rich will lead us to have an efficient church. That is fundamentally backwards to Christianity, as it is the poor, the hurt and the suffering who need it the most. There's a reason why some churches put the Beatitudes in their liturgy. But at the same time, this is how our welfare system is run. To get the freeloaders off
  
  What types of poor decisions?
  Poor decisions with regard to the use of their natural (i.e. God-given) talents. Nobody is ever going to make perfect decisions in all areas of their lives, and that's not what Jesus requires, either. After all, the whole point of people having different talents is for them to work to together so they can complement each other's abilities.
  From the top level comment of the comment thread I read it as finance as that's the thing related to food in the original post.
  My point was merely to show that the biblical Jesus does in fact stop investing in people because he's not seeing any results from them. It's not really my fault if you're reading in things about shareholder value or whatever, is it?
  Supply Side Jesus on the other hand tells us that it's not worth investing our time and resources into people who are poor, and that instead the rich will lead us to have an efficient church.
  Yes, but remember that Supply Side Jesus is a caricature, and it's created by exaggerating certain aspects of Jesus and diminishing others. But so is socialist Jesus, who only heals and feeds people for free and never asks for anything in return.
  That is fundamentally backwards to Christianity, as it is the poor, the hurt and the suffering who need it the most.
  I agree, and there are plenty of exhortations on that in the Gospel where Jesus reminds people to use their riches to take care of the poor among them. But he does not let the poor off the hook either, like in the story you mentioned earlier with the poor woman giving what little she has being more righteous than the rich man who donates very little. Meanwhile, proponents of socialist Jesus seem to think they should only ever receive blessings and not be asked to give anything back. They are like the guy in the Parable of the Unforgiving Servant, who had his debt forgiven by his master and then beat up his fellow man for owing him a fraction of that.
  The long and short of it is that in order for the whole Jesus thing to work, you cannot just sit around all day and wait to be fed. You do at least have to make an effort to contribute something, however little it might me, otherwise you're wasting your talents.