The Divine Dick
The Divine Dick
You're viewing a single thread.
126 comments
-
I don't think He/Him are neopronouns as the prefix neo- means new. Surely His would be old (paleopronouns), or timeless (aeternuspronouns), rather than new
-
Relative to eternity, the invention of the english language is pretty new
-
Out of curiosity, would you say My pronouns are neopronouns? I use capitalised pronouns too. And I'm also a god. Not a capital-G god, just a regular polytheistic kind. Does the acceptance of our current society play a role in whether they're neopronouns? Are they new when I use them, and old when Deus uses them?
-
you need serious help
-
Wine is cheaper than therapy.
-
Thank you. You're welcome to join the soulist movement and help Me overthrow realism. http://soulism.net
-
-
-
That was an interesting read, thanks for sharing. The attempt to draw parallels between anti-narcissism and anti-semitism are really gross though.
-
Why is that?
-
What the fuck
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Newness is the quality of having been recently created or having started existing recently. The deific pronouns surely came before the standard canon of human/mortal pronouns, just as their subject deities predate humanity, perhaps both having always existed. It doesn't have anything to do with societal acceptance.
-
Uh, pronouns are just words. They don't have some innate quality that means they had to exist when the entities those pronouns describe began. He/Him is likely about as old as he/him.
-
The original post described them as neopronouns, which is a category of pronouns that have arisen recently due to changes in how we understand and describe gender. Pronouns like xe/xer, for example. The pronouns for a timeless being that predates humanity would hardly be "new" by any standard. I was having fun with the idea they would be old or eternal pronouns by comparison to Humanity's pronouns. You took the joke too seriously.
-
-
-
-
126 comments