Burning Up

And you can bake things at 420

You could bake something at 420 Celsius too, assuming your okay with charcoal as the end product
- Or Pizza!
ok you actually convinced me, Fahrenheit is better (except I can't spell it properly without autocorrect)
- I can't spell it properly without autocorrect
  This is genuinely the most inconvenient thing about Fahrenheit
you can also bake things at 420C if you're not a coward about this (like proper thin pizza) (maybe it's a bit too high but you get the idea)
- Well... If it's only for a few seconds...
You can make the temperature dial of an oven have matching degrees of rotation and degrees Celcius.
Turn the dial to point straight down to bake at 180°
Turn it 3/4 of the way to cook a pizza at 270°

a 69°C cup coffee on winter is nice

A cup of lukewarm coffee please.
Edit: my wrong, I thought it was 69°F !
All my excuses
- According to James Hoffmann, the ideal temperature to enjoy coffee is between 50°C and 60°C, he may know a thing or two about coffee, and you may think the coffee you drink is hotter that it really is.

Also it's a 0-100 scale of how hot it is outside, and it requires no prior understanding to use it as such.

The freezing point of water is very important to weather, and requires prior knowledge of the arbitrary number 32.
- Is it? Only pure water will actually freeze at 0c. Rain, puddles, lakes, etc aren't all that pure... And we're talking about ambient air temps here. The air can be below freezing and it can still rain. And you can get snow/hail above freezing...
  Knowing the freezing point is just one factor. Knowing it's generally around 30F is pretty much always close enough (not that remembering 32 is actually very difficult)
  Edit: also water only freezes at 0c if it's at sea level... I really don't think 0°=freezing is the huge advantage that celcius stans think it is.
- yeah, and let me know how accurate our weather models and prediction systems are. Can you calculate accurately how much the temperature in a specific part of the atmosphere will drop to a large updraft?
  What's that? This is literally an entire career field of study and development? Oh that's weird.
  Also the only real time this is relevant, is when things that have this weird property called thermal mass get below freezing, it's snowing in 30f weather? That's not sticking, the ground is too warm. or the sun will literally just melt it even if it is cold enough. Water? You mean that weird thing called like, a lake or river? Those get below freezing, without actively freezing, lakes won't even drop that much in terms of temperature, aside from the surface level. The surface may freeze, but even that is pretty variable.
  Also yes, it's the arbitrary number of 32, so is literally every number though. We have 2 numbers to remember, you also have 2 numbers to remember, god forbid you have like, a password, or a passcode, or like, a numbers based lock somewhere. Humans have never been known to be good at memorizing short strings of data.
  like idk how to tell you this, but, it's not that big of a deal?
- Okay so fahrenheit has a well-defined high and low, but an arbitrary freezing point of one certain chemical. All other chemical freezing points are arbitrary.
  Celsius has an arbitrary high and low, but a well-defined freezing point of that same chemical. All other freezing points are arbitrary.
  If your motivation is to minimize the amount of arbitrary values you have to memorize, fahrenheit is the clear winner.
  
  The zero C is freezing and 100 C is boiling, so not really arbitrary.
  But it's pretty hard to define a scale that has intuitive, round numbers for everything we might care about.
  
  You're correct. In a lab setting, 0C and 100C are not arbitrary.
  In the weather forecast, they are.
  Which ties into your final point, it's hard to define a scale that is best for everything, which is exactly what I've been saying this whole time. Fahrenheit is better for some things, Celsius for others.
  The only reason people in this thread are saying otherwise is because for some reason they've tied up some significant part of their self-worth into their belief that "lmao DAE fahrenheit bad amirite??1?", and they mistakenly believe that those of us that understand nuance are trying to belittle or disparage them in some way. I assure you, we are not.
  
  0C and 100C are not arbitrary.
  well i mean technically, the only reason they aren't arbitrary is because the mean something, the numbers arent significant, it's what they represent, which is the boiling/freezing point of water.
  The only reason people in this thread are saying otherwise is because for some reason they’ve tied up some significant part of their self-worth into their belief that “lmao DAE fahrenheit bad amirite??1?”, and they mistakenly believe that those of us that understand nuance are trying to belittle or disparage them in some way. I assure you, we are not.
  i'm seeing people put very little thought into the things they're saying, i just recently posted a comment covering a few of those things in this thread. For some reason europeans seem to just get absolutely brainfucked when presented with the concept of a unit system that isn't metric, it's like your literal entire lives are built upon the concept of 0 10 100 scaling, and you can't consider literally anything outside of it.
  Now maybe i'm being a little hyperbolic here, but US peeps pretty well understand that we could just "be using celsius" that's not really a wacky concept or idea here. Celsius peeps really seem to think that if they had to use fahrenheit, they would probably die from accidental over-consumption of water, somehow. And in their defense, a lot of our shit is kinda fucking weird. But again, it's really not that bad.
  at least, this has been my experience from the various threads i've been in on this topic over time.
  
  The 0 in Fahrenheit was based on nothing and the 100F was supposed to be human temperature but it is off by some degrees
  The water is not an arbitrary temperature, the weather is water dependant, at 0C the water will freeze and you get snow/ice instead of rain
  
  0°F is when the ocean freezes
  100° F was human body temperature, later revised somewhat with better measurements and a decrease of parasites . The average person in those days in London had a slightly higher body temperature than today
  
  0F is not ocean freezing, is the freezing temp of a brine mix that he chose arbitrarily (some think that he chose that temp because it was close to the coldest his town had ever been and he used it to calibrate the scales of his thermometers)
  FYI, the ocean freezes at around 28F
  
  Oceans freezing also depends on currents, and mixing of the water from the surface. 28° will freeze water in a room.
  This is why often the ocean is not frozen at much lower temperatures.
  I’m not at all cognizant of how 0 was decided
  
  It’s not like the weather depends on the boiling point of formaldehyde…
If that was true outsiders should be able to use Fahrenheit without much explanation. I've never got a clue what the °F values mean, I always have to use a converter. It's really not as intuitive as people who grew up with it seem to believe.
- If that was true outsiders should be able to use Fahrenheit without much explanation. I’ve never got a clue what the °F values mean, I always have to use a converter. It’s really not as intuitive as people who grew up with it seem to believe.
  because it's all relative, and you need to actually know how the temperatures relate to the things you're experiencing? I'm going to hazard a guess and say you're comfortable with using celsius? Oops cognitive bias. You would have to test this on someone who doesn't understand temperature yet. It just so happens that here in the US, it pretty conveniently lines up with those figures for us.
  
  If your example cannot be proven on any existing person I'd argue it's hardly relevant to our reality.
  °F most definitely isn't intuitive enough for people who aren't accustomed to it to use. If it is more intuitive at all, it's not to any meaningful degree.
  
  If your example cannot be proven on any existing person I’d argue it’s hardly relevant to our reality.
  possibly? Arguably you could still make the case that the existing range of 0-100f is more pleasant, and arguably nicer to use. But you would have to either find someone uniquely adapted to both systems, or you would have to do a lot of independent study on how humans interact with numbers and ranges of numbers. In order to find a specific answer it's going to be quite hard.
  intuition is bullshit anyway, it's highly predicated on previous experience and an existing knowledge base, so i feel like that's kind of arguing "well a race car driver drives good, so why don't normal drivers drive good" kind of territory if you arent careful.
  
  Yeah, which is why most people here in favor of Celcius argue that Fahrenheit isn't, in fact, more intuitive and therefore more suited to describe the weather. Both are arbitrary, both can be learned and used very easily, the only difference is what you're used to.
  
  yeah, but i think arguing that celsius is "more intuitive" when the one primary advantage outside of science is that it lines up with water relatively nicely compared to fahrenheit, is like, ok.
  32f and 212f and 0c and 100c aren't really all that substantially different as far as the general use case goes.
  
  arguing that celsius is "more intuitive"
  Nobody is arguing that though.
  
  which is why most people here in favor of Celcius argue that Fahrenheit isn’t, in fact, more intuitive and therefore more suited to describe the weather.
  hmm.
  
  "Fahrenheit isn't more intuitive" doesn't not mean "Celcius is more intuitive". You're mistaken if you think that's what's being argued here.
  Neither one is intuitive. Intuition isn't a useful metric here anyway. After all we could ask: Which one is more intuitive - kilometers or miles? Kilograms or pounds? Do we have to change how me measure time (base 12) to a base 10 as well, would that be more intuitive?
  Answer is no. All those units have to be learned and filled with experience anyway. Nobody can interpret temperature scales intuitively, neither Fahrenheit nor Celsius.
  Fahrenheit simply has no advantage over Celcius. And it doesn't have to. Some people are used to it, so keep using it by all means. Don't argue that it's superior and we're all good.
Exactly. Fahrenheit is just metric weather.