Big Bad Wolf Thought
Big Bad Wolf Thought
You're viewing part of a thread.
Show Context
226 comments
-
The monarchy is slightly controversial but the majority of danes like it. There are certain benefits - if we didn't have a king, we'd need a president instead who would be a much more politically divisive figure than the king is. As it is, the king is a much more uniting figure. We also don't need to have elections for the president or any of that stuff.
And no, of course he has no real power. Which is honestly good, cause a president would have more power than that. I personally prefer the situation as it is right now. The king stays because the people say so - that is also democracy.
-
That you accept the child of the wolf as your king doesn't change that your King was born into wealth because of the violence of his ancestors.
-
That's fair, but his ancestors crimes are not his to bear or be blamed for.
And again, it doesn't change that the people still want to keep the monarchy. So democracy has spoken.
-
So it's fine if I murder your family and take everything your children have so that my children can live in luxury?
In the US, mobsters kill with impunity while their family gets reality TV (Mob wives) showing off their life of luxury. The "children are innocent of their parents crimes" is unjust because the victims' children suffer.
The King is the child of a mobster. His luxury life came from violence. Your children will have to work their entire lives in part because of what the King's ancestors stole from them.
-
Obviously that is not fine but you're making a strawman of what I said before. The situation you present is not comparable.
-
The King lives in luxury because his ancestors killed your ancestors and left their children in poverty to work for him.
That's not a strawman.
I provided the background that your claim "children are innocent of their parents' crimes" isn't just.
-
The danish monarchy is so old that this is so far in the past that it literally does not matter any more. A couple of generations, sure. 1000 years of generations? Nobody cares and I don't think it's reasonable to blame anyone for crimes made by ancestors that far in the past. It's not like we blame me for my ancestors (vikings) pillaging of Englang and other horrible things they did.
-
The King was still profiting from African slave trade in the early 1800's.
-
Lots of people where profiting from slave trade 200 years ago and we don't prosecute any ancestors of those people today. I really don't know what your point is.
-
You said his parents crimes aren't his to bear and I argue that children shouldn't benefit from the crimes of their parents.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
226 comments