Skip Navigation

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
334 comments
  • You know that there are death camps in North Korea to this day right? Where as South Korea does not have any death camps.

    US went out of its way to stop the spread of the communism and destabilize socialist countries in the 20th century. I think these foreign policy decisions were a mistake. Our focus should be on a country's political structure and not its economic structure.

    Afghanistan HAD democracy under the DRA

    One party systems are not democracy. edit: spacing

    And Iraq, this MUST be the single democratic war fought by the U.S. right?

    This is a straw man. I don't agree with the war in Iraq. Read my comments if you don't believe me. Iraq gained democracy which is the only silver lining I can think of but their government has since backslid to the detriment of the Iraqi people. Hopefully they will make a course correction.

    Say that bs “oh I guess they weren’t ready for democracy” nonsense again I dare you. You don’t deserve to prance around these topics and “learn” by defending horrific atrocities and seeing what responses you get.

    Democracy cannot be forced. If people don't fight to defend it, it will be taken away. edit: grammar

    I've spent a lot of time learning about these topics because they interest me. But I'm certainly not an expert.

    • Your reply barely addresses anything lmao.

      You know that there are death camps in North Korea to this day right? Where as [sic] South Korea does not have any death camps.

      Wow! I am shocked and appalled! May I have an article to read on this startling atrocity?

      One party systems are not democracy [sic]

      Democracy is entirely empty when there is no rule by the majority (i.e. class rule, of which the U.S. is ruled by an economic minority that decides candidacy under the illusory pretext of multiparty competition). The multiparty system by itself is not a guarantee of democracy nor is it the only system of democracy. There can be competing ideas within a party (especially a mass party as the PDPA), and party rule does not negate elections to party positions and mass participation. This is much more a slogan that completely misunderstands different political realities than an actual point. Terrible response to my multitude of points on Afghanistan, although I don’t know if you’re capable of anything else. Under the PDPA, equal rights for women, land reform, and public healthcare were established (Against Empire, p. 57). The king and autocracy were overthrown, labor unions were legalized, women were allowed to read and hold government positions and began literacy programs alongside poor peasants. The U.S. undid all of this by supporting terrorists and committed atrocities in order to ensure their own interests (yay democracy!).

      This is a straw man. I don't agree with the war in Iraq. Read my comments if you don't believe me.

      When you wrote that you “think what [the U.S. government] learned from Afghanistan and Iraq is that democracy cannot be forced.” This, in my view at least, clearly implies that the U.S. government was fighting in Iraq for democracy. Feel free to give me an alternate interpretation.

      Democracy cannot be forced. If people don't fight to defend it, it will be taken away.

      This is a fine platitude, but not what I was addressing. I was specifically noting your comments I just mentioned on how these pursuits failed because “democracy cannot be forced”, i.e. the U.S. was “forcing democracy” where people were not ready for it. I categorically reject that U.S. FP is oriented towards democracy (and you’ve done nothing to prove it is), and think it is absolutely disgusting to say that this is what the U.S. needs to “learn from", that the people simply "weren't ready" for our good will and hospitality in the form of bombs and torture. It’s whitewashing nonsense.

    • I'll get around to the comment you addressed to me but:

      You know that there are death camps in North Korea to this day right?

      Death camps are camps used for killing people, usually in a semi-industrialized fashion. The DPRK has never had these. It has prison labor, but that's not the same. South Korea also has prison labor.

      Edit: Regarding your article, aside from HRW being literally purpose-built for laundering those sorts of stories and the "evidence" being an office in the UN submitting something for discussion, South Korea also has accusations against it of torturing political prisoners.

      Still no death camps in "north kora"

334 comments